Is marriage more than cohabitation? well-being differences in 30 European countries

Journal of Marriage and Family

Volumn 71, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1141-1157

  Soons, Judith P M ^a   Kalmijn, Matthijs ^b  

^a Education Council of the Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cohabitation; Cross national; Life events and transitions; Marriage; Multilevel models; Well being

Indexed keywords

EID: 71149121275     PISSN: 00222445     EISSN: 17413737     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00660.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Arts, W., Hagenaars, J., & Halman, L. (2003). The cultural diversity of European unity: Findings, explanations and reflections from the European Values Study. Leiden, Netherlands : Brill.
2. Berkman, L., Glass, T., Brisette, I., & Seeman, T. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Social Science and Medicine, 51, 843 857.
3. Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Berkeley : University of California Press.
4. Bowman, C. G. (2004). Legal treatment of cohabitation in the United States. Law and Policy, 26, 119 151.
5. Brines, J., & Joyner, K. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333 355.
6. Brown, S. L. (2000). The effect of union type on physiological well-being: Depression among cohabitors versus marrieds. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 241 255.
7. Brown, S. L. (2004). Moving from cohabitation to marriage: Effects on relationship quality. Social Science Research, 33, 1 19.
8. Brown, S. L., & Booth, A. (1996). Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 668 678.
9. Bumpass, L. L., & Lu, H.-H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29 41.
10. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848 861.
11. Clark, A. E., Diener, E., Georgellis, Y., & Lucas, R. E. (2008). Lags and leads in life satisfaction: A test of the baseline hypothesis. Economic Journal, 118, F222 F243.
12. Clarkberg, M., Stolzenberg, R. M., & Waite, L. J. (1995). Attitudes, values and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609 634.
13. Coombs, R. H. (1991). Marital status and personal well-being: A literature review. Family Relations, 40, 97 102.
14. De Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2003). Alternative routes in the remarriage market: Competing-risk analyses of union formation after divorce. Social Forces, 81, 1459 1498.
15. De Jong-Gierveld, J. (2004). Remarriage, unmarried cohabitation, living apart together: Partner relationships following bereavement or divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 236 243.
16. Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 31, 419 436.
17. Ellison, C. G. (1991). Religious involvement and subjective well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 32, 80 99.
18. Evenson, R. J., & Simon, R. W. (2005). Clarifying the relationship between parenthood and depression. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 46, 341 358.
19. Hackney, C. H., & Sanders, G. S. (2003). Religiosity and mental health: A meta-analysis of recent studies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 43 55.
20. Hagerty, M. R., & Veenhoven, R. (2003). Wealth and happiness revisited - Growing national income does go with greater happiness. Social Indicators Research, 64, 1 27.
21. Hoem, J. M., Kostova, D., Jasilioniene, A., & Muresan, C. (2008). Traces of the Second Demographic Transition in four selected countries in Central and Eastern Europe: Union formation as a demographic manifestation. WP No. 2007-026. Rostock, Germany: Max-Planck-Institute for Demographic Research.
22. Horwitz, A. V., & White, H. R. (1998). The relationship of cohabitation and mental health: A study of a young adult cohort. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 505 514.
23. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
24. International Monetary Fund. (2008). World Economic Outlook Database. Retrieved May 14, 2008, from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/02/ weodata/index.aspx
25. Jones, W. H., & Kugler, K. (1993). Interpersonal correlates of the guilt inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 246 258.
26. Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
27. Kalmijn, M. (2007). Explaining cross-national differences in marriage, cohabitation, and divorce in Europe, 1990-2000. Population Studies, 61, 243 263.
28. Kamp Dush, C. M., & Amato, P. R. (2005). Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 607 627.
29. Kiernan, K. (2000). European perspectives on union formation. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York : Aldine Gruyter.
30. Kiernan, K. (2004). Unmarried cohabitation and parenthood in Britain and Europe. Law and Policy, 26, 33 55.
31. Liefbroer, A. C., & Dourleijn, E. (2006). Unmarried cohabitation and union stability: Testing the role of diffusion using data from 16 European countries. Demography, 43, 203 222.
32. Liefbroer, A. C., & Fokkema, T. (2008). Recent trends in demographic attitudes and behaviour: Is the Second Demographic Transition moving to Southern and Eastern Europe? In J. Surkyn, J. v. Bavel, & P. Deboosere (Eds.), Demographic challenges for the 21st century. A state of art in demography (pp. 115 141). Brussels : Brussels University Press.
33. Lindenberg, S. (2001). Intrinsic motivation in a new light. Kyklos, 54, 317 342.
34. Lucas, R. E. (2005). Time does not heal all wounds: A longitudinal study of reaction and adaptation to divorce. Psychological Science, 16, 945 950.
35. Lucas, R. E., Clark, A. E., Georgellis, Y., & Diener, E. (2003). Reexamining adaptation and the setpoint model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 527 539.
36. Manting, D. (1996). The changing meaning of cohabitation and marriage. European Sociological Review, 12, 53 65. (Pubitemid 126336257)
37. Marcussen, K. (2005). Explaining difference in mental health between married and cohabiting individuals. Social Psychological Quarterly, 68, 239 257.
38. Mastekaasa, A. (1992). Marriage and psychological well-being: Some evidence on selection into marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 901 911.
39. Mastekaasa, A. (2006). Is marriage/cohabitation beneficial for young people? Some evidence on psychological distress among Norwegian college students. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 149 165.
40. Mayer, K. U. (2004). Whose lives? How history, societies and institutions define and shape life courses. Research in Human Development, 1, 161 187.
41. Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage, and trajectories in well-being and relationships [On-line working paper series]. Los Angeles : California Center for Population Research, University of California.
42. Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16, 53 76.
43. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men's career-development process. Demography, 40, 127 149.
44. Orth, U., Berking, M., & Burkhardt, S. (2009). Self-conscious emotions and depression: Rumination explains why shame but not guilt is maladaptive. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32, 1608 1619.
45. Rindfuss, R. R., & VandenHeuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Developmental Review, 16, 703 726.
46. Rosenthal, R., Rosnow, R. L., & Rubin, D. B. (2000). Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
47. Ross, C. E. (1995). Reconceptualizing marital status as a continuum of social attachment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 129 140.
48. Ross, C. E., & Willigen, M. V. (1997). Education and the subjective quality of life. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 275 297.
49. Smock, P. J., & Manning, W. D. (2004). Living together unmarried in the United States: Demographic perspectives and implications for family policy. Law and Policy, 26, 87 117.
50. Smock, P. J., Manning, W. D., & Porter, M. (2005). "Everything's there except money": How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680 696.
51. Stack, S., & Eshleman, J. R. (1998). Marital status and happiness: A 17-nation study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 527 536. (Pubitemid 128368178)
52. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Hill, D. H. (1992). Reciprocal effects of religiosity, cohabitation, and marriage. The American Journal of Sociology, 98, 628 651.
53. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Teachman, J. D. (1995). The influence of school enrollment and accumulation on cohabitation and marriage in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 60, 762 774.
54. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1009 1037.
55. Verbakel, E., & de Graaf, P. M. (2008). Resources of the partner: Support or restriction in the occupational career? Developments in the Netherlands between 1940 and 2003. European Sociological Review, 24, 81 95.
56. Waaldijk, K. (2005). More or less together: Levels of legal consequences of marriage, cohabitation and registered partnership for different-sex and same-sex partners: A comparative study of nine European countries. Working Paper No. 125. Paris: National Institute for Demographic Studies.
57. Wagner, M., & Weiss, B. (2006). On the variation of divorce risks in Europe: Findings from a meta-analysis of European longitudinal studies. European Sociological Review, 22, 483 500.
58. Waite, L. J. (2000). Trends in men's and women's well-being in marriage. In L. J. Waite (Ed.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation. New York : Aldine Gruyter.
59. Waite, L. J., & Gallagher, M. (2000). The case for marriage: Why married people are happier, healthier, and better off financially. New York : Doubleday.
60. Waite, L. J., & Joyner, K. (2001). Emotional satisfaction and physical pleasure in sexual unions: Time horizon, sexual behavior, and sexual exclusivity. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 247 264.
61. Williams, K., & Dunne-Bryant, A. (2006). Divorce and adult psychological well-being: Clarifying the role of gender and child age. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 1178 1196.
62. Williams, K., & Umberson, D. (2004). Marital status, marital transitions, and health: A gendered life course perspective. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 81 98.
63. Wilson, C. M., & Oswald, A. J. (2005). How does marriage affect physical and psychological health? A survey of the longitudinal evidence. Discussion Paper No. 1619. Bonn : Institute for the Study of Labor.
64. Woo, H., & Raley, R. K. (2005). A small extension to "Costs and rewards of children: The effects of becoming a parent on adults' lives." Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 216 221.