Pareto navigator for interactive nonlinear multiobjective optimization

OR Spectrum

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 211-227

  Eskelinen, Petri ^a   Miettinen, Kaisa ^b   Klamroth, Kathrin ^c   Hakanen, Jussi ^b  

^a HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision support; Interactive methods; MCDM; Multicriteria optimization; Pareto optimality

Indexed keywords

EID: 71149119760     PISSN: 01716468     EISSN: 14366304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00291-008-0151-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benayoun R, de Mongolfier J, Tergny J, Larichev O (1971) Linear programming with multiple objective functions: STEP method (STEM). Math Program 1: 366-375.
2. Chankong V, Haimes YY (1983) Multiobjective decision making: theory and methodology. Elsevier, New York.
3. Craft D (2007) Pareto Surface Navigator. http://www. mathworks. com/matlabcentral, File Id: 13875.
4. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester.
5. Hwang C-L, Masud ASM (1979) Multiple objective decision making-methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, vol 164. Springer, Berlin.
6. Jaszkiewicz A, Slowiński R (1999) The light beam search approach-an overview of methodology and applications. Eur J Oper Res 113: 300-314.
7. Kaliszewski I (2004) Out of the mist-towards decision-maker-friendly multiple criteria decision making support. Eur J Oper Res 158: 293-307.
8. Klamroth K, Miettinen K (2008) Integrating approximation and interactive decision making in multicriteria optimization. Oper Res 56(1): 222-234.
9. Klamroth K, Tind J, Wiecek MM (2002) Unbiased approximation in multicriteria optimization. Math Meth Oper Res 56: 413-437.
10. Köksalan M, Plante RD (2003) Interactive multicriteria optimization for multiple-response product and process design. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 5: 334-347.
11. Korhonen P, Wallenius J (1988) A Pareto race. Naval Res Logist 35: 615-623.
12. Lotov AV, Bushenkov VA, Kamenev GK (2004) Interactive decision maps. Approximation and visualization of Pareto frontier. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
13. Miettinen K (1999) Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer, Boston.
14. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (1995) Interactive bundle-based method for nondifferentiable multiobjective optimization: NIMBUS. Optimization 34: 231-246.
15. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (2000) Interactive multiobjective optimization system WWW-NIMBUS on the internet. Comput Oper Res 27: 709-723.
16. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (2002) On scalarizing functions in multiobjective optimization. OR Spectr 24: 193-213.
17. Miettinen K, Mäkelä MM (2006) Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization. Eur J Oper Res 170: 909-922.
18. Monz M, Küfer KH, Bortfeld TR, Thieke C (2008) Pareto navigation-algorithmic foundation of interactive multi-criteria IMRT planning. Phys Med Biol 53: 985-998.
19. Nakayama H, Sawaragi Y (1984) Satisficing trade-off method for multiobjective programming. In: Grauer M, Wierzbicki AP (eds) Interactive decision analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 113-122.
20. Ruzika S, Wiecek MM (2005) Approximation methods in multiobjective programming. J Optim Theory Appl 126: 473-501.
21. Sawaragi Y, Nakayama H, Tanino T (1985) Theory of multiobjective optimization. Academic Press, New York.
22. Steuer RE (1986) Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation and applications. Wiley, New York.
23. Vanderpooten D (1989) The interactive approach in MCDA: a technical framework and some basic concceptions. Math Comput Modell 12(10-11): 1213-1220.
24. Wierzbicki AP (1980) The use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimization. In: Fandel G, Gal T (eds) Multiple criteria decision making theory and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 468-486.
25. Wierzbicki AP (1982) A mathematical basis for satisficing decision making. Math Modell 3(25): 391-405.
26. Wierzbicki AP (1986) On the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problems. OR Spectr 8(2): 73-87.