Simple and Efficient Minimal RDFS

Journal of Web Semantics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 220-234

  Muñoz, Sergio ^a   Pérez, Jorge ^b,c   Gutierrez, Claudio ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^c Khipu: South Andean Center for Database Research   (Chile)

Author keywords

Efficient entailment; RDF; RDFS; Semantic Web

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; CORE FUNCTIONALITY; DEDUCTION SYSTEMS; DEDUCTIVE SYSTEMS; EFFICIENT ENTAILMENT; LANGUAGE DESIGN;

LINGUISTICS; SEMANTIC WEB;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 71149104489     PISSN: 15708268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.websem.2009.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baget J.-F. RDF entailment as a graph homomorphism. Fourth International Semantic Web Conference (2005)
2. Ben-Or M. Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (1983)
3. T. Berners-Lee, Principles of design, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Principles.html, personal Notes.
4. Borgida A., Calvanese D., and Rodriguez-Muro M. Explanation in the dl-lite family of description logics. Proc. of the 7th Int. Conf. on Ontologies, DataBases, and Applications of Semantics (ODBASE 2008) (2008)
5. Carroll J.J., Bizer C., Hayes P.J., and Stickler P. Named graphs. Journal of Web Semantics 3 4 (2005) 247-267
6. Dalmau V., Kolaitis P.G., and Vardi M.Y. Constraint satisfaction, bounded treewidth, and finite-variable logics. Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2002 (2002)
7. L.M. Dan Brickley (ed.), FOAF Vocabulary Specification, http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/, 2005 (July 2005).
8. Dbpedia project, http://dbpedia.org/.
9. de Bruijn J., Franconi E., and Tessaris S. Logical reconstruction of RDF and ontology languages. Principles and Practice of Semantic Web Reasoning, Third International Workshop (2005)
10. de Bruijn J., and Heymans S. Logical foundations of (e)rdf(s): Complexity and reasoning. 6th International Semantic Web Conference (2007)
11. R.G. Edit, D. Brickley, RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema, W3C recommendation (February 2004).
12. J.J.C. Edit, G. Klyne, RDF concepts and abstract syntax, W3C recommendation (February 2004).
13. Gene ontology, http://www.geneontology.org/.
14. Gottlob G., Leone N., and Scarcello F. The complexity of acyclic conjunctive queries. Journal of ACM 48 3 (2001) 431-498
15. Grau B.C. A possible simplification of the semantic web architecture. Proceedings of the 13th international conference on World Wide Web (2004)
16. Gutiérrez C., Hurtado C.A., and Mendelzon A.O. Foundations of semantic web databases. Proceedings of the Twenty-third Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (2004)
17. P. Hayes, RDF semantics, W3C recommendation (February 2004).
18. Kifer M., Lausen G., and Wu J. Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages. Journal of ACM 42 4 (1995) 741-843
19. Linked data, http://linkeddata.org/.
20. D. Marin, A formalization of RDF (applications de la logique á la sémantique du web), Tech. rep., École Polytechnique - Universidad de Chile, dept. Computer Science, Universidad de Chile, TR/DCC-2006-8. http://www.dcc.uchile.cl/cgutierr/ftp/draltan.pdf (2004).
21. Munoz S., Pérez J., and Gutiérrez C. Minimal deductive systems for RDF. Fourth European Semantic Web Conference (2007)
22. Pan J.Z., and Horrocks I. RDFS(FA) and RDF MT: Two semantics for RDFS. Second International Semantic Web Conference (2003)
23. E. Prud'hommeaux, A. Seaborne, SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C recommendation, (January 2008).
24. ter Horst H.J. Completeness, decidability and complexity of entailment for rdf schema and a semantic extension involving the owl vocabulary. Journal of Web Semantics 3 2-3 (2005) 79-115
25. Yang G., and Kifer M. Reasoning about anonymous resources and meta statements on the semantic web. Journal on Data Semantics 1 (2003) 69-97