Readers' knowledge of popular genre

Discourse Processes

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 541-571

  Dixon, Peter ^a   Bortolussi, Marisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71049185956     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530902959570     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adorno, T., & Horkeimer, M. (1972). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception (J. Cumming, Trans.). In T. Adorno & M. Horkeimer (Eds.), Dialectic of enlightenment (pp. 94- 137). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Alberta Learning. (2000). English language arts (K-9). Retrieved July 15, 2006, from http://www. education.gov.ab.ca/k%5F12/curriculum/bySubject/english/
3. Attebery, B. (1992). Fantasy and the narrative transaction. In N. Ruddick (Ed.), State of the fantastic: Studies in the theory and practice of fantastic literature and film (Vol. 16, pp. 15-27). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
4. Bainsbridge,W. S. (1986). Dimensions of science fiction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Blish, J. (1964). The issue at hand. Chicago: Advent.
7. Brunetière, F. (1890). L'evolution des genres [The evolution of genres]. Paris: Hachette.
8. Cawelti, J. G. (1976). Adventure, mystery, and romance: Formula stories as art and popular culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Cioffi, F. (1982). Formula fiction? An anatomy of American science fiction, 1930-1940. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
10. De Bruyn, F. (1993). Genre criticism. In I. R. Makaryk (Ed.), Encyclopedia of contemporary literary theory (pp. 79-85). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
11. Dixon, P., & Bortolussi, M. (2005). Approach and selection of popular narrative genre. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 1-18.
12. Dubrow, H. (1982). Genre. London: Methuen.
13. Fiedler, L. (1986). The criticism of science fiction. In G. E. Slusser, E. S. Rabkin, & R. Scholes (Eds.), Coordinates: Placing science fiction and fantasy (pp. 1-14). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. Fincher-Kiefer, R., Post, T. A., Greene, T. R., & Voss, J. F. (1988). On the role of prior knowledge and task demands in the processing of text. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 416-428.
15. Fishelov, D. (1993). Metaphors of genre: The role of analogies in genre theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16. Fowler, A. (1982). Kinds of literature: An introduction to the theory of genres and modes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (Eds.). (1994). Genre and the new rhetoric. London: Taylor & Francis.
18. Green,M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247-266.
19. Guillén, C. (1972). Sátira y poética en Garcilaso [Satire and poetics in Garcilaso]. In G. Sobejano (Ed.), Homenaje a Casalduero: Crítica y poesía [Homage to Casalduero: Criticism and poetry]. Madrid, Spain: Rizel Pincus Sigele.
20. Hartwell, D. (1984). Age of wonders: Exploring the world of science fiction. New York: Walker.
21. Hernadi, P. (1972). Beyond genre: New directions in literary classification. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22. Hughes, H. (1993). The historical romance. London: Routledge.
23. Jameson, F. (1975). Magical narratives: Romance as genre. New Literary History, 7(1), 135-163.
24. Jauss, H. R. (1979). La jouissance esthétique [Aesthetic pleasure]. Poetics, 10, 261-274.
25. Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organiztion of conversational interaction (pp. 219-248). New York: Academic.
26. Laham, D. (1998). LSA@CU Boulder. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://lsa.colorado.edu
27. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211-241.
28. Larsen, S. F., & Laszlo, J. (1990). Cultural-historical knowledge and personal experience in appreciation of literature. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 425-440.
29. Mann, P. H. (1979). Romantic fiction and its readers. In H.-D. Fischer & S. R. Melnik (Eds.), Entertainment: A cross-cultural examination (pp. 34-42). New York: Hastings House.
30. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31. Modleski, T. (1982). Living with a vengeance: Mass-produced fantasies for women. Hamden, CT: Archen Books.
32. Nicolls, P. (1979). Definitions of SF. In P. Nicholls (Ed.), The encyclopedia of science fiction (pp. 159-161). New York: Granada.
33. Pearce, L., & Stacey, J. (Eds.). (1995). Romance revisited. New York: New York University Press.
34. Piters, A. M. P. (2000). Is dit boek wat voor mij?: Genreherkenning en voorkeursvorming op basis van het boekomslag [Is this book for me? The evaluation of genre and preference based on book covers]. Maastricht, Germany: Shaker Publishing.
35. Radway, J. A. (1984). Reading romance: Women, patriarch, and popular literature. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
36. Ryan, M. L. (1981). Introduction: On the why, what, and how of generic taxonomy. Poetics, 10, 109-126.
37. Strelka, J. P. (Ed.). (1978). Theories of literary genre. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
38. Sutherland, J. A. (2003). Fiction and the erotic cover. Critical Quarterly, 33(2), 3-18.
39. Todorov, T. (1990). Genres in discourse. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
40. Toolan, M. J. (1995). Narrative: A critical linguistic introduction. New York: Routledge.
41. Van Leeuwen, T. (1987). Generic strategies in press journalism. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 199-220.
42. Wollheim, D. A. (1971). The universe makers: Science fiction today. New York: Harper & Row.
43. Wolmark, J. (1995). The postmodern romances of feminist science fiction. In L. Pearce & J. Stacey (Eds.), Romance revisited (pp. 158-171). New York: New York University Press.
44. Zwaan, R. A. (1994). Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 920-933.