Investigating the Effects of San Francisco’s treatment on demand initiative on a publicly-funded substance abuse treatment system: A time series analysis

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 297-304

  Sears, Clare ^a   Davis, Thomas ^b   Guydish, Joseph ^b   Gleghorn, Alice ^c  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Substance abuse treatment; Time series analysis; Treatment on demand

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROL GROUP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT; PUBLIC HEALTH; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 71049177867     PISSN: 02791072     EISSN: 21599777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2009.10400540     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. ArizonaState Legislature. 1997. ArizonaDrugMedicalization, Prevention, and Control Act of 1996. Proposition 200. Forty-third Arizona State Legislature H.B. 2518. Available at http://www.azleg.gov/.
2. Anglin, M.D.; Hser, Y.I. & Grella, C. 1997. Drug addiction and treatment careers among clients in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors II: 308-23.
3. Banerjee, A.; Dolado, J.J.; Galbraith, J.W. & Hendry, D.F. 1993. Cointegration, Error Correction, and the Econometric Analysis of Non-Stationary Data. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bernstein, J.; Bernstein, E.; Tassiopoulos, K; Heeren, T.; Levenson, S. & Hingson, R. 2005. Brief motivational intervention at a clinic visit reduces cocaine and heroin use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 77: 49-59.
5. Box, G.E.P. & Pierce, D.A. 1970. Distribution of residual correlations in autoregressive-integrated moving average time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65: 1509-26.
6. Brecht, M.; Hser, Y. & Anglin, M. 1990-91. A multimethod assessment of social intervention effects on narcotics use and property crime. International Journal of the Addictions 25 (11A): 1317-40.
7. Brockwell, P.J. & Davis, R.A. 1991. Time Series and Forecasting Methods. Second Ed. New York: Springer.
8. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2002. Local Area Unemployment Statistics, 1990-2000. Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor. Available at http://www.bls.gov/laufliome.htm.
9. Chang, C.F.; Kiser, L.J.; Bailey, J.E.; Martins, M.; Gibson, W.C.; Schaberg, K.A.; Mirvis, D.M. & Applegate, W.B. 1998. Tennessee’s failed managed care program for mental health and substance abuse services. Journal of the American Medical Association 279: 864-69.
10. Chiu, A.Y.; Perez, P.E. & Parker, R.N. 1997. Impact of banning alcohol on outpatient visits in Barrow, Alaska. Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 1775-77.
11. Cleveland, R.B.; Cleveland, W.S.; McRae, J.E. & Terpenning, I. 1990. STL: A seasonal-trend decomposition procedure based on loess. Journal of Official Statistics 6: 3-73.
12. Cunningham, J.K. & Liu, L. 2008. Impact of methamphetamine precursor chemical legislation, a suppression policy, on the demand for drug treatment. Social Science & Medicine 66: 1463-73.
13. Deck, D. D.; McFarland, B.H.; Titus, J.M.; Laws, K.E. & Gabriel, R.M. 2000. Access to substance abuse treatment services under the Oregon Health plan. Journal of the American Medical Association 284: 2093-99.
14. Dennis, ML.; Scott, C.K.; Funk, R. & Foss, M.A. 2005. The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 28 (Suppl 1): 551-62.
15. Desy, P.M. & Perhats, C. 2008. Alcohol screening, brief intervention, and referral in the emergency department: An implementation study. Journal of Emergency Nursing 34: 11-19.
16. Drug Strategies. 2000. Smart Steps: Treating Baltimore's Drug Problem. Available at http://www.drugstrategies.com/acrobat/baltimore.pdf.
17. Durbin, J. & Koopman, S.J. 2001. Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Ettner, S.L.; Huang, D.; Evans, E.; Ash, D.R.; Hardy, M.; Jourabchi, M. & Hser, Y.I. 2006. Benefit-cost in the California treatment outcome project: Does substance abuse treatment "pay for itself’? Health Services Research 41 (1): 192-213.
19. Falcato, L.; Stohler, R.; Dursteler-Mac Farland, K.M.; Eichenberger, A.; Eich, D. & Rossler, W. 2001. Closure ofan open drug scene-acase register-based analysis of the impact on the demand for methadone maintenance treatment. Addiction 96: 623-28.
20. Fletcher, B.W.; Lehman, WE.; Wexler, H.K.; Melnick, G.; Taxman, F.S. & Young, D.W. 2009. Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 101 (3): 191-201.
21. Friedmann, P.D.; D'Aunno, T.A.; Jin, L. & Alexander, J.A. 2000. Medical and psychosocial services in drug abuse treatment: Do stronger linkages promote client utilization? Health Services Research 35: 443-65.
22. Gardner, G.; Harvey, A.C. & Phillips, G.D.A. 1980. Algorithm AS 154. An algorithm for exact maximum likelihood estimation of autoregressive-moving average models by means of Kalman filtering. Applied Statistics 29: 311 -22.
23. Gerstein, D.R.; Johnson, R.A.; Harwood, H.J.; Fountain, D.; Suter, N. & Malley, K. 1994. Evaluating Recovery Services: The California Drug and Alcohol Treatment Assessment, General Report. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
24. Guydish, J.; Woods, W.J.; Davis, T.; Bostrom, A. & Frazier, Y. 2001. Does centralized intake improve drug abuse treatment outcomes? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 20: 1-9.
25. Guydish, J.; Moore, L.; Gleghorn, A.; Davis, T.; Sears, C. & Harcourt, J. 2000. Drug abuse treatment ondemand inSan Francisco: Preliminary findings. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 32: 363-70.
26. Hoffman, K.A.; Ford, J.H.; Choi, D.; Gustafson, D.H. & McCarty, D. 2008. Replication and sustainability of improved access and retention within the Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 98 (1-2): 63-69.
27. Holder, H. & Parker, R. 1992. Effect of alcoholism treatment on cirrhosis mortality: A 20-year multivariate time series analysis. British Journal of Addiction 87: 1263-74.
28. Hser, Y.I.; Teruya, C.; Brown, A.H.; Huang, D.; Evans, E. & Anglin, M.D. 2007. Impact of California’s Proposition 36 on the drug treatment system: Treatment capacity and displacement. American Journal of Public Health 97:104-09.
29. Hser, Y.I.; Teruya, C.; Evans, E.A.; Longshore, D.; Grella, C. & Farabee, D. 2003. Treating drug-abusing offenders: Initial findings from a five-county study on the impact of California’s Proposition 36 on the treatment system and patient outcomes. Evaluation Review 27: 479-505.
30. Hser, Y.l.; Hoffman, V.; Grella, C.E. & Anglin, M.D. 2001. A 33-year follow-up of narcotics addicts. Archives of General Psychiatry 58 (5): 503-08.
31. Mann, R.E.; Smart, R.G.; Stoduto, G.; Beimess, D.; Lamble, R. & Vingilis, E. 2002. The early effects of Ontario’s Administrative Driver’s Licence Suspension law on driver fatalities with a BAC 80 mg%. Canadian Journal of Public Health 93: 176-80.
32. Mattick, R.P. & Hall, W. 1996. Are detoxification programmes effective? Lancet 347: 97-100.
33. McCarty, D.; Caspi, Y.; Panas, L.; Krakow, M. & Mulligan, D.H. 2000. Detoxification centers: Who’s in the revolving door? Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research 27: 245-56.
34. McKay, J.R.; Lynch, K.G.; Shepard, D.S.; Ratichek, S.; Morrison, R.; Koppenhaver, J. & Pettinati, H.M. 2004. The effectiveness of telephone-based continuing care in the clinical management of alcohol and cocaine use disorders: 12-month outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 72 (6): 967-79.
35. McLellan, A.T.; Hagan, T.A.; Levine, M.; Gould, F.; Meyers, K.; Bencivengo, M. & Durrell, J. 1998. Supplemental social services improve outcomes in public addiction treatment. Addiction 93: 1489-99.
36. NASDAQ. 2002. NASDAQ Composite Index at Close of Day. Accessed at http://www.econstats.com
37. R Development Core Team. 2005. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 2.1.1. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www. R-project.org.
38. San Francisco Board of Supervisors. 1996. Substance Abuse Treatment on Demand Resolution Number 10-55-96, File Number 30-96-20.
39. San Francisco Department of Public Health. 1997. Substance Abuse Treatment on Demand First Steps Plan. San Francisco, California: San Francisco Department of Public Health Community Substance Abuse Services.
40. Scott, C.K.; Dennis, M.L. & Foss, M.A. 2005. Utilizing Recovery Management Checkups to shorten the cycle of relapse, treatment reentry, and recovery. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 78: 325-38.
41. Sorensen, J.; Guydish, J.; Zilavy, P.; Davis, T.; Gleghorn, A. & Jacoby, M. 2007. Access todrug abuse treatment under a Treatment on Demand policy in San Francisco. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 33: 227-36.
42. Stephens, R.C.; Scott, C. & Muck, R. (Ed.) 2003. Clinical Assessment and Substance Abuse Treatment: The Target Cities Experience. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
43. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). 2007. Resultsfromthe 2006 National Survey on Drug Use andHealth: National Findings. NSDUH Series H-32, DHHS Publication No. SMA 07-4293. Rockville, MD: Office of Applied Studies.
44. United States Census Bureau. 2000. Estimates of the Population of US Counties by Age, Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin: 1990-1999. Available at http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/1990s/C0-99-12.html.
45. University of California, San Diego. 2002. San Francisco (Mission Dolores), CA Precipitation in Millimeters, 01/1850 to 05/2001. Climate Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego. Available at http://meteora.ucsd.edu/wx_pages/climatology.html.
46. Warner, R.M. 1998. Spectral Analysis ofTime-Series Data. New York and London: Guilford Press.
47. Weisner, C.; Ray, G.T.; Mertens, J.R.; Satre, D.D. & Moore, C. 2003. Short-term alcohol and drug treatment outcomes predict long-term outcome. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 71 (3): 281-94.