Provisional vs. complex stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions: Meta-Analysis of randomized trials

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 21, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 589-595

  Hakeem, Abdul ^a   Khan, Faisal M ^a   Bhatti, Sabha ^a   Samad, Zainab ^a,b   Effat, Mohamed A ^a   Eckman, Mark H ^a,c   Helmy, Tarek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex stenting; Coronary bifurcation lesions; Outcomes; Provisional stenting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; DEATH; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESTENOSIS; REVASCULARIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENT THROMBOSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK FACTORS; STENTS;

EID: 71049173596     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: 15572501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A. Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:1446-1455. (Pubitemid 41446178)
2. Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: Classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:274-283.
3. Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG, et al. Bifurcation lesions: Two stents versus one stent-immediate and follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:1145-1151.
4. Suwaidi JA, Berger PB, Rihal CS, et al. Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:929-936.
5. Suwaidi JA, Yeh W, Cohen HA, et al. Immediate and one-year outcome in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions in the modern era (NHLBI dynamic registry). Am J Cardiol 2001;87:1139-1144.
6. Latib A, Colombo A. Bifurcation disease: What do we know, what should we do? J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 2008;1;218-226.
7. Meier B, Gruentzig AR, King SB III, et al. Risk of side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1984;53:10-14.
8. Myler RK, Shaw RE, Stertzer SH, et al. Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: Current experience and analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:1641-1652.
9. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics -2008 Update American Heart Association available at: http://www.americanheart.org/presenter.jhtml? identifier=3000090.
10. Hildick-Smith D; BBC ONE (British Bifurcation Coronary study: Old, new and evolving) strategies trial, presented at TCT 2008, Washington, D.C.
11. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus- Eluting Stents) study. Circulation 2009;119:71-78.
12. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, et al Randomized study to evaluate sirolimuseluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004;109:1244-1249.
13. Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, et al. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional Tstenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2859-2867.
14. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006;114:1955-1961.
15. Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, Romero M, et al. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: A randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J 2004;148:857-864.
16. Higgins JPT, Green S (eds). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
17. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177-188.
18. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:1539-1558.
19. Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Klovgaard L, et al. Comparison of sirolimus eluting and bare metal stents in coronary bifurcation lesions: Subgroup analysis of the Stenting Coronary Arteries in Non-Stress/Benestent Disease Trial (SCANDSTENT). Am Heart J 2006;152:1140-1145. (Pubitemid 44872987)
20. Kelbaek H, Klovgaard L, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients treated with sirolimus eluting stents in complex coronary artery lesions. 3-year result of the scandstent (Stenting coronary arteries in non-stress/Benestent Disease) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51:2011-2016.
21. Pan M, Suarez de Lezo J, Medina A, et al. Simple and complex stent strategies for bifurcated coronary arterial stenosis involving the side branch origin. Am J Cardiol 1999;83:1320-1325.
22. Anzuini A, Briguori C, Rosanio S, et al. Immediate and long-term clinical and angiographic results from Wiktor stent treatment for true bifurcation narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1246-1250.
23. Ge L, Tsagalou E, Iakovou I, et al. In-hospital and nine-month outcome of treatment of coronary bifurcational lesions with sirolimus-eluting stent. Am J Cardiol 2005;95:757-760.
24. Pan M, Suárez de Lezo J, Medina A, et al. Drug-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: A randomized comparison between paclitaxel and sirolimus stents. Am Heart J 2007;153:15. e1-e7.
25. Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, Ge L, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA 2005;293:2126-2130.
26. Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D, et al . Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions: Immediate results and 30-day outcome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;60:145-151.
27. Ge L, Airoldi F, Iakovou I, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: Importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:613-620.
28. Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, et al. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:633-637.
29. Topol EJ, Mark DB, Lincoff AM, et al. Outcomes at 1 year and economic implications of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade in patients undergoing coronary stenting: results from a multicentre randomised trial. EPISTENT Investigators. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting. Lancet 1999;354:2019-2024.
30. Niccoli G, Ferrante G, Porto I, et al. Coronary bifurcation lesions: To stent one branch or both? A meta-analysis of patients treated with drug eluting stents. Int J Cardiol. 2008 Nov 21 [Epub ahead of print].