Stress analysis on the free-end distal extension of an implant-supported mandibular complete denture

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 182-189

  Greco, Gustavo Diniz ^a   Jansen, Wellington Corrêa ^b   Landre Jr, Janis ^b   Seraidarian, Paulo Isaías ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Dental implantation; Dental occlusion

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; NICKEL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MANDIBLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BIOMECHANICS; CHROMIUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE, COMPLETE, LOWER; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NICKEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TITANIUM;

EID: 71049172165     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242009000200014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Feb;91(2):144-50.
2. Guichet DL, Yoshinobu D, Caputo AA. Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restoration. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 May;87(5):528-35.
3. Lin CL, Wang JC, Kuo YC. Numerical simulation on the biomechanical interactions of tooth implant-supported system under various occlusal forces with rigid/non-rigid connections. J Biomech. 2006;39(3):453-63.
4. Krammer A, Weber H, Benzing U. Implant and prosthetic treatment of the edentulous maxilla using a bar-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 Sum;7(2):251-5.
5. Ogawa T, Ogimoto T, Koyano K. Validity of the examination method of occlusal contact pattern relating to mandibular position. J Dent. 2000 Jan;28(1):23-9.
6. Eckert SE, Laney WR. Patient Evaluation and Prosthodontic Treatment planning for Osseointegrated Implants. Dental Clin North Am. 1989;3(4):185-92.
7. Bidez MW, McLoughlin SW, Chen Y, English CE. Finite element analysis of four abutment Hader bar designs. Implant Dent. 1993 Sum;2(3):171-8.
8. Bosse LP, Taylor TD. Problems Associated with Implant Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla. Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42(1):117-27.
9. Mc Cartney JW. Cantilever rests: an alternative to the unsupported distal cantilever of osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses for the endentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(5):817-9.
10. Osier JF. Biomechanical local analysis of cantilevered implant systems. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17(1):40-7.
11. Shacketon JL, Carr L, Slabbert JC, Becker PJ. Survival of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 Jan;71(1):23-6.
12. Watson RM, Davis DM, Forman GH, Coward T. Considerations in design and fabrication of maxillary implant-supported protheses. Int J Prosthodont. 1991 May-Jun;4(3):232-9.
13. Pokorny GM, Solar P. Biomechanical of Endosseous Implant. In: Watzek G. Endosseous implants: scientific and clinical aspects. Chicago: Quintessence; 1996.
14. Mc Alarney ME, Strauvopoulos D. Theoretical cantilever lengths versus clinical cases. J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Mar;83(3):332-43.
15. White SN, Caputo AA, Anderkvist T. Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1994 May;71(5):493-9.
16. Assif D, Marshak B, Horowitz A. Analysis of load transfer and stress distribution by an implant-supported fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Mar;75(3):285-91.
17. Benzing UR, Gall H, Weber H. Biomechanical Aspects of two different Implant-Prosthetic concepts for Edentulous Maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 Mar-Apr;10(2):188-98.
18. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jörneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989 Fall;4(3):241-7.
19. Lundgren D, Falk H, Laurell L. The Influence of Number and Distribution of Occlusal Cantilever Contacts on Closing and Chewing Forces in Dentition with Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses Occluding with Complete Dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989;4(4):277-83.
20. Skalak R. Aspects of Biomechanics Considerations. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (editors). Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 117-28.