Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks

Memory

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 840-846

  Blumen, Helena M ^a   Rajaram, Suparna ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative inhibition; Collaborative memory; Group strategy hypothesis; Retrieval disruption; Transfer appropriate processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; COLLABORATIVE MEMORY; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LANGUAGE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEMORY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; WORD RECOGNITION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VERBAL LEARNING; WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 71049171611     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210903266931     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas, R. L. III. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(5), 1176-1191.
2. Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and benefits of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14 (6), 497-507.
3. Bäuml, K. H., & Aslan, A. (2006). Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: The role of encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(1), 33-443.
4. Blumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16(3), 231-244.
5. Carpenter, S. K., & DeLosh, E. L. (2006). Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Memory & Cognition, 34 (2), 268-276.
6. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (2004). Extensions of the Paivio, Yuille and Madigan (1968) norms. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(3), 371-383.
7. Clark, S., Hori, A., Putnam, A., & Martin, T. P. (2000). Group collaboration in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1578-1588.
8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112 155-159.
9. Cuc, A., Koppel, J., & Hirst, W. (2007). Silence is not golden: A case for socially-shared retrieval-induced forgetting. Psychological Science, 18(9), 727-733.
10. Duchastel, P. C. (1981). Retention of prose following testing with different types of tests. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6(3), 217-226.
11. Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000). Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 (6), 1556-1567.
12. Glover, J. A. (1989). The 'testing' phenomenon: Not gone but nearly forgotten. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 392-399.
13. Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519-533.
14. Payne, D. G. (1987). Hypermnesia and reminiscence in recall: A historical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 101 (1), 5-27.
15. Roediger, H. L. III, Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (Eds.). (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
16. Takahashi, M., & Saito, S. (2004). Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition? Memory, 12(6), 722-731.
17. Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23 (5), 1160-1175.
18. Weldon, M. S., Blair, C., & Huebsch, D. (2000). Group remembering: Does social loafing underlie collaborative inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26 (6), 1568-1577.
19. Wright, D. B., & Klumpp, A. (2004). Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6), 1080-1083.