A hybrid approach to upstream requirements: IBIS and cognitive mapping

Rationale Management in Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 137-154

  Rooksby, John ^a   Sommerville, Ian ^a   Pidd, Mike ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

cognitive mapping; decision making; design rationale; IBIS; requirements engineering

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COGNITIVE MAPPING; DESIGN RATIONALE; IBIS; MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS; PROBLEM STRUCTURING METHODS; STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL UNCERTAINTY; TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES;

MAPPING;

EID: 71049159119     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30998-7_6     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Bergman M, Leslie King J, Lyytinen K (2002) Large-scale requirements analysis revisited: The need for understanding the political ecology of requirements engineering.. Requir. Eng. 7:152-171
2. Boehm BW, Bose P, Horowitz, Lee MJ (1995) Software requirements negotiation and renegotiation aids: A theory W-based spiral approach. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), ACM, New York, pp. 243-253
3. Boehm BW, Egyed A, Kwan J, Port D, Shah A, Madachy RJ (1998) Using the Win Win spiral model: A case study. IEEE Comput. 31(7):33-44
4. Briggs RO, Grünbacher P (2002) EasyWinWin: Managing complexity in requirements negotiation with GSS. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2002, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA.
5. Buckingham Shum S (1996) Analysing the usability of a design rationale notation. In: Moran TP, Carroll JM (eds.) Design Rationale: Concepts, Techniques, and use, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ pp. 185-215
6. Buckingham Shum S, De Roure D, Eisenstadt M, Shadbolt N (2002) CoAK-TinG: Collaborative advanced knowledge technologies in the grid. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Advanced Collaborative Environments. Eleventh IEEE International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing. July 24-26, 2002, Edinburgh.
7. Conklin J (2003) Dialogue mapping: Reflections on an industrial strength case study. In: Kirschner P, Buckingham Shum S, Carr C (eds.) Visualizing argumentation. Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sensemaking. Springer, London Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 117-135
8. Conklin J, Selvin A, Buckingham Shum S, Sierhuis M (2001) Facilitated hypertext for collective sensemaking: 15 years on from gIBIS. In: Proceedings of ACM Hypertext 2001, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 123-124
9. Damian D, Eblerlein A, Shaw M, Gaines B (2003) An exploratory study of facilitation in distributed requirements engineering. Requir. Eng 8:23-41
10. Dix A (2005) Validity. In: Reflexive HCI: Towards a Critical Technical Practice, Workshop at CHI 2004, 26th April 2004, Vienna, Austria
11. Dutoit A, Paech B (2002) Rationale-based use case specification. Requir. Eng. 7:3-19
12. Eden C, Ackermann F (2001) SODA - The principles. In: Rosenhead J, Mingers J (eds.) Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited, Wiley, Chichester
13. Eden C, Ackermann F (1998) Making strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management. London, Sage Publications
14. Halling M, Biffl S, Grünbacher P (2003) An economic approach for improving requirements negotiation models with inspection. Requir. Eng. 8:236-247
15. Kirschner P, Buckingham Shum S, Carr C (eds) (2003) Visualizing argumentation. Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, London Berlin Heidelberg New York
16. Kotonya G, Sommerville I (2001) Requirements engineering. Processes and techniques, Wiley, Chichester.
17. Law J (2003) Making a mess of a method. Published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, UK. Available at http://www.comp. lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/law-making-a-mess-withmethod.pdf
18. Lee J, Lai KC (1991) What's in design rationale? Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 3 & 4:251-280
19. Mackenzie A, Pidd M, Rooksby J, Sommerville I, Warren I, Westcombe M (2006) Wisdom, decision support and paradigms of decision making. Eur. J. Operat. Res., 170, 1:156 171
20. MacLean A, Bellotti T, Young R, Moran T (1991) Questions, options and criteria: Elements of design space analysis. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 3 & 4:201-250
21. Monk S, Sommerville I, Pendaries JM, Durin B (1995) Supporting design rationale for system evolution. In: Schäfer W, Botella P (eds.) Proceedings of Software Engineering - ESEC'95, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp. 307-323
22. Nguyen L, Swatman PA (2003) Managing the requirements engineering process. Requir. Eng. 8:55-68
23. Nietzsche N (1889/2004) Why I Am so Wise (Trans. Hollingdale RJ). Penguin Books, London
24. Pidd M (2002) Tools for Thinking: Modelling in Management Science, 2nd ed.. Wiley, Chichester.
25. Rittel HJ, Kunz W (1970) Issues as elements of information systems. Working paper 131, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California at Berkeley.
26. Rooksby J, Westcombe M, Pidd M, Sommerville I (2003) Managing stakeholder requirements in high performance computing procurement. In: Proc. of UK e-Science All Hands Meeting, Nottingham, 2-4 September, pp. 878-884
27. Selvin A (2003) Fostering collective intelligence: Helping groups use visualized argumentation. In: Kirschner P, Buckingham Shum S, Carr C. (eds.) Visualizing Argumentation. Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making. Springer, London, pp. 137-163
28. Selvin A, Buckingham Shum S, Magellen Horth D, Palus C, Sierhuis M (2002) Knowledge art: Visual sensemaking using combined Compendium and Visual Explorer methodologies. Presented at The Art of Management and Organisation Conference, 3-6 September 2002, London.
29. Selvin A, Buckingham Shum S, Sierhuis M, Conklin J, Zimmermann B, Palus C, Drath W, Horth D, Domingue J, Motta E, Li G (2001) Compendium: Making maps into knowledge events. Presented at Knowledge Technologies 2001, March 4-7, Austin TX.
30. Viller S (1991) The group facilitator: A CSCW perspective. In: 2nd European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), Amsterdam, 25-27 September
31. Westcombe M, Pidd M (2002) Problem solving dialogue: Cognitive mapping and IBIS. Working paper MS01/02. Management School, Lancaster University, UK