Teaching writing in community colleges: A situated view of how adults learn to write in computer based writing classrooms

Community College Review

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 21-42

  Hansman, Catherine A ^a   Wilson, Arthur L ^b  

^a Adult Learning Department at Cleveland State University   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71049150968     PISSN: 00915521     EISSN: 19402325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009155219802600102     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher; 18(1), p. 3242-3242.
2. Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition. Educational Researcher; 19(6), 2-10.
3. DeBauche, S. C. (1990). The effects of word processing in teaching writing in business communication courses at Southwest Baptist University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arkansas.
4. Driscoll, M. P. (1994). Psychology of learning and instruction. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
5. Duin, A. H., & Hansen, C. (1994). Reading and writing on computer networks as social construction and social interaction. In C. L. Selfe & S. Hilligoss (Eds.), Literacy and computers: The complications of teaching and learning with technology (pp. 85-112). New York: The Modem Language Association.
6. Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: A critique and a proposal. College English, 527-542.
7. Farmer, J. (1991). Helping adults learn what they need to learn but what they can't learn adequately on their own. In Proceedings of the Projectfor the Study ofAdult Learning. Normal, IL: College of Continuing Education and Public Service, Illinois State University.
8. Flower, L, & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365-387.
9. Giddens, J. (1979). A central problem in social theory: Action structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Geertz, C. (1973). Interpretations of culture: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
11. Hatch, G. L. (1992). Reviving the rodential model for composition: Robert Zoellner's alternative to Flower and Hayes. Rhetoric Review, 10(2), 244-249.
12. Jacobson, W. (1996). Learning, culture, and learning culture. Adult Education Quarterly, 47(1), 15-28.
13. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. Merriam, S. B., (1988). Case study research in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.
15. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
16. Murray, D. (1980). Writing as a process. In T. R. Donaovan & V. W. McClelland (Eds.), Eight approaches to teaching composition (pp. 3-20). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
17. Nystrand, M. (1990). Sharing words: The effects of readers on developing writers. Written Communication, 7(1), p. 3-24.
18. Orey, M. A., & Nelson, W. A. (1994). Situated learning and the limits of applying the results of these data to theories of cognitive apprenticeships. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373 746).
19. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage Publications.
20. Petkosh, D. G. (1990). The revising behaviors of three undergraduate technical writers assisted by the word processor: A qualitative case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA.
21. Randic, J. (1991, March). Employing Freire's notion of dialogue as the 'Sealing Power' in the writing classroom: Theoretical base and a call for change. Paper presented at the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Boston. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 331 069).
22. Resnick, L.B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher 16(9), 13-20.
23. Rogoff, B., & Lave J. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Rose, M. (1980). Rigid rules, inflexible plans and stifling language. College Composition and Communications, 31(4), 389-401.
25. Rubin, D. (1988). Introduction: Four dimensions of social construction in written communication. In D. Rubin & B. R. Rafoth (Eds.), The social construction of written communication (pp. 1-33). Norwood, MA: Ablex.
26. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27. Smagorinsky, P., & Smith, M. (1992). The nature of knowledge in composition and literary understanding: The question of specificity. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 279-305.
28. Tarvers, J. K. (1993). Teaching writing: Theories and practice (4th ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
29. U.S. Department of Education. (1995). National Center for Education Statistics: Statistics in brief. (NCES 95-823). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
30. Walters, M. B. (1992). Talk-write pedagogy: Instrumental concept for compositions today. Rhetoric Review, 10(2), 239-243.
31. Wilson, A. L. (1993a). Adult learning, situated cognition, and authentic activity: Relocating adult education in the context of experience. In the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Adult Education Research Conference (pp. 335-340). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
32. Wilson, A. L. (1993b). The promise of situated cognition. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), An update on adult learning theory (pp. 71-79). New Directions forAdult and Continuing Education, No. 57. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33. Zoellner, R. (1969). Talk-write: A behavioral pedagogy for composition. College English, 30, 267-320.