DRM, trusted computing and operating system architecture

Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series

Volumn 44, Issue , 2005, Pages 127-136

  Reid, Jason F ^a   Caelli, William J ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS CONTROL MODELS; COMPUTING PLATFORM; DIGITAL CONTENTS; DISCRETIONARY ACCESS CONTROL; DRM CLIENT; ENFORCEMENT MECHANISMS; MANDATORY ACCESS CONTROL; MICROSOFT; NEXT-GENERATION SECURE COMPUTING BASE; OPERATING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE; PRIVILEGED PROCESS; PROTECTION ARCHITECTURE; REFERENCE MONITORS; REMOTE ATTESTATION; TRUSTED COMPUTING; TRUSTED COMPUTING GROUPS;

ACCESS CONTROL; GRID COMPUTING;

COPYRIGHTS;

EID: 71049135827     PISSN: 14451336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, J.P. (1972). Computer Security Technology Planning Study. ESD-TR-73-51, Air Force Electronic Systems Division, Hanscom AFB, Bedford, MA.
2. Anderson, R.J. (2003). Cryptography and competition policy: issues with 'trusted computing'. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2003), July 13-16, Boston, Massachusetts, pp 3-10.
3. Arbaugh, W.A. Farber, D.J. et al. (1997). A secure and reliable boot strap architecture. In Proceedings of 1997 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pp 65-71, May 1997.
4. Badger, L. Sterne, D.F. et al. (1995). Practical domain and type enforcement for Unix. In Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, page 66, IEEE Computer Society.
5. Bell, D.E. and LaPadula, L.J (1973). Secure computer systems: Mathematical foundations and model. Technical Report M74 244, The MITRE Corp., Bedford MA.
6. Biddle, P., England, P., Peinado, M. and Willman, B. (2003). The Darknet and the future of content protection. In Digital Rights Management-Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. LNCS 2770, Springer, pp 344-365.
7. Corbato, F.J., Saltzer, J.H. and Clingen C.T. (1972). Multics - the first seven years. In Proceedings of the Spring Joint Computer Conference, pages 571-583, AFIPS Press.
8. CEN/ISSS, (2003). Digital Rights Management Report http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/ict/policy/doc/drm.pdf. Accessed 18 August 2004.
9. Ferraiolo, D. Cugini, J. and Kuhn, R. (1995). Role Based Access Control (RBAC): Features and motivations. In Proceedings of the Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, New Orleans, Louisianna, December 11-15, IEEE Computer Society Press.
10. Harrison, M., Ruzzo, W. and Ullman, J. (1976). Protection in Operating Systems. Communications of the ACM, 19(8) pp. 461-471.
11. Hauser, T. and Wenz, C. (2003): DRM Under Attack: Weaknesses in Existing Systems. In Digital Rights Management-Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects. LNCS 2770, Springer, pp 206-223.
12. Lacy, J., Snyder, J.H. and Maher, D.P. (1997). Music on the Internet and the intellectual property protection problem. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE 97), Vol 1, pp 77-83.
13. Loscocco, P.A. Smalley, S.D. et al. (1998). The inevitability of failure: The flawed assumption of security in modern computing environments. In 21st National Information Systems Security Conference, Arlington, VA., August.
14. Loscocco, P.A. Smalley, S.D. (2001). Meeting critical security objectives with Security-Enhanced Linux. In Proceedings of the 2001 Ottawa Linux Symposium.
15. Menezes, A.J. Van Oorschot, P.C. and Vanstone, S.A. (1996). Handbook of Applied Cryptography, CRC Press, ISBN 0849385237.
16. Microsoft, (2004), Next Generation Secure Computing Base-Product Information, available at: http://www.microsoft.com/resources/ngscb/productinfo.mspx, accessed 20 July 2004.
17. Peinado, M. Chen, Y. et al. (2004), NGSCB: A Trusted Open System. In Proceedings of 9th Australasian Conference on Information Security and Privacy ACISP, Sydney, Australia, July 13-15.
18. Robin, J. and Irvine, C. (2000). Analysis of the Intel Pentium' s ability to support a secure virtual machine monitor. In Proceedings of the 9th USENIX Security Symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA, August 14-17.
19. Rooney, P. (2004). Microsoft Shelves NGSCB Project as NX Moves to Centre Stage. 5 May 2004, http://www.crn.com/sections/BreakingNews/dailyarchives.asp?ArticleID=49936 accessed 7 May 2004.
20. Sailer, R. Zhang, X. et al. (2004). Design and implementation of a TCG-based integrity measurement architecture. In Proceedings of the 13th Usenix Security Symposium, San Diego, August 9-13.
21. Saltzer, J.H. and Schroeder, M.D. (1975). The protection of information in computer systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(9):1278-1308, Sept.
22. Schell, R., Tao, T. and Heckman M. (1985). Designing the GEMSOS security kernel for security and performance. In Proceedings of National Computer Security Conference, Gaithersburg.
23. Schneck, P. (1999). Access Control to Prevent Piracy of Digital Information. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(7):1239-1250.
24. Solomon, D.A., and Russinovich, M. (2000). Inside Microsoft Windows 2000. Microsoft Press, 2000. ISBN 0735610215.
25. Stefik, M. (1997). Shifting the Possible: How Trusted Systems and Digital Property Rights Challenge Us to Rethink Digital Publishing. Berkeley Technology Law Journal Vol. 12. No.1. pp 137-159.
26. Trusted Computing Group, (2003), Trusted Platform Module Main Specification, Part 1: Design Principles, Part 2: TPM Structures, Part 3: Commands, October 2003, Version 1.2, Revision 62, available at http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org, accessed 26 May 2004.
27. WIPO, (1996). World Intellectual Property Organization. Wipo copyright treaty. http://www.wipo.org/eng/diplconf/distrib/treaty01.htm Accessed 15 April 2004.