Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 161-168

  Pola Poiate, Isis Andréa Venturini ^a   de Vasconcellos, Adalberto Bastos ^b   Poiate Jr, Edgard ^a   Cervantes Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Computing methodologies; Imaging; Methods; Three dimensional; Tomography; Tooth injuries

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DENTAL CARE; ENAMEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INCISOR; MASTICATION; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TENSILE STRENGTH; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH CERVIX;

BITE FORCE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INCISOR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 71049117736     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242009000200012     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;52(3):374-80.
2. Kuroe T, Itoh H, Caputo AA, Konuma M. Biomechanics of cervical tooth structure lesions and their restoration. Quintessence Int. 2000;31(4):267-74.
3. Rees JS. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 1998;106(6):1028-32.
4. McCoy G. The etiology of gingival erosion. J Oral Implantol. 1982;10:361-2.
5. Geramy A, Sharafoddin F. Abfraction: 3D analysis by means of the finite element method. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(7):526-33.
6. Cohen BI, Condos S, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. Pilot study comparing the hotoelastic stress distribution for four endo-dontic post systems. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23(10):679-85.
7. a ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1996.
8. Lee SY, Huang HM, Lin CY. In vivo and in vitro natural frequency analysis of periodontal conditions, an innovative method. J Periodontol. 2000;71(4):632-40.
9. Farah JW, Craig RG. Finite element stress analysis of a restored axisymmetric first molar. J Dent Res. 1974;53(4):859-66.
10. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68(3):421-7.
11. Rees JS, Hammadeh M. Undermining of enamel as a mech-anism of abfraction lesion formation: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci. 2004;112(4):347-52.
12. Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ, Cook SD. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14(1):23-9.
13. Albuquerque RC, Polleto LT, Fontana RH, Cimini CA. Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(9):936-43.
14. Lewgoy HR, Youssef MN, Matson MR, Bocangel JA, Netto CA, Amore R. Finite elements study of the Flexi Post and Flexi Flange post systems in a maxillary central incisor. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 Apr-Jun;17(2):132-6. Epub 2003 Oct 10. Erratum in: Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003 Jul-Sep;17(3):216.
15. Palamara D, Palamara JEA, Tyas MJ, Messer HH. Strain patterns in cervical enamel of teeth subjected to occlusal loading. Dent Mater. 2000;16(6):412-9.
16. Palamara JEA, Palamara D, Messer HH, Tyas MJ. Tooth morphology and characteristics of non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2005;34(3):185-94.
17. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31(1):18-22.
18. Tanaka M, Naito T, Yokota M, Kohno M. Finite element analysis of the possible mechanism of cervical lesion formation by occlusal force. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;30(1):60-7.
19. O'Brien WJ. University of Michigan. NIDR Materials Science Research Center at the University of Michigan School of Dentistry. Biomaterials Properties Database [homepage on the Internet] [accessed 2005 Dec 25; Revised April, 1996]. Available from: http://www.zubnistranky.cz/intro.html.
20. Asundi A, Kishen A. Advanced digital photoelastic investigations on the tooth-bone interface. J Biomed Opt. 2001;6(2):224-30.
21. Romeed SA, Fok SL, Wilson NH. A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;112(33):209-15.
22. Rudd KD, O'Leary TJ, Stumpf AJ. Horizontal tooth mobility in carefully screened subjects. Periodontics. 1964;2:65-8.
23. Jepsen A. Root surface measurement and a method for X-ray determination of root surface area. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;21(1):35-46.
24. Borcic J, Anic I, Smojver I, Catic A, Miletic I, Ribaric PS. 3D finite element model and cervical lesion formation in normal occlusion and in malocclusion. JOral Rehabil. 2005;32(7):504-10.
25. Kishen A, Tan KBC, Asundi A. Digital moiré' interferometric investigations on the deformation gradients of enamel and dentine: An insight into non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent. 2006;34(1):12-8.
26. Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC, Wilder AD, Sluder TB, Brunson WD. Examining tooth flexural effects on cervical restorations: a two-year clinical study. J Am Dent Assoc. 1991;122(5):41-7.
27. Fernandes CP, Chevitarese O. The orientation and direction of rods in dental enamel. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(4):793-800.
28. Ott RW, Proschel P. [Etiology of wedge-shaped defects. A function-analytical, epidemiologic and experimental study] [Article in German]. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1985;40:1223-7.