Antagonistic bacteria and their post-culture liquids in the protection of pea (Pisum sativum L.) from diseases;Bakterie antagonistyczne i ich płyny pohodowlane w ochronie grochu (Pisum sativum L.) przed chorobami

Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 31-42

  Piȩta, Danuta ^a   Pastucha, Alina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES IN LUBLIN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Bacillus sp; Pea; Post culture liquids; Pseudomonas sp.

Indexed keywords

ASCOCHYTA PISI; BACILLUS (BACTERIUM); BACILLUS SP.; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BOTRYOTINIA FUCKELIANA; FUNGI; FUSARIUM CULMORUM; FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM; FUSARIUM OXYSPORUM F. SP. PISI; FUSARIUM SOLANI; HYPHOMYCETES; PHOMA EXIGUA; PISUM SATIVUM; PSEUDOMONAS; PSEUDOMONAS SP.; PSEUDOMONAS SP. PK; PYTHIUM; PYTHIUM IRREGULARE; SCLEROTINIA SCLEROTIORUM; THANATEPHORUS CUCUMERIS;

EID: 71049114292     PISSN: 16440692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abanda-Nipwatt D., Krimm U., Schreiber L., Schwab W., 2006. Dual antagonism of aldehydes and epiphytic bacteria from strawberry leaf surfaces against the pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea in vitro. BioControl 51, 3, 279-291.
2. Babu S., Seetharaman K., Nandakumar R., Johnson I., 2000. Biocontrol efficacy of Pseudomonas fluorescens against Alternaria solani and tomato leaf blight disease. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci., 8, 2, 252-254.
3. Borecki Z., 1984. Fungicydy stosowane w ochronie roślin. PWN, Warszawa.
4. Cartwright D. K., Chilton W. S., Benson D. M., 1995. Pyrrolnitrin and phenazine production by Pseudomonas cepacia strain 5.5 B, a biological agent of Rhizoctonia solani. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 43, 211-121.
5. Chełkowski J., 1985. Mikotoksyny, wytwarzaja̧ ce je grzyby i mikotoksykozy. Wyd SGGW-AR. Warszawa, 1-96.
6. De R. K., Dwivedi R. P., Narain U., 2003. Biological control of lentil wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci. 11, 1, 46-52.
7. Domenech J., Reddy M. S., Kloepper J. W., Ramos B., Gutierrez-Mañero J., 2006.Combined application of the biological produkt LS213 with Bacillus, Pseudomonas or Chryseobacterium from growth promotion and biological control of soil-borne diseases in pepper and tomato. BioControl 51, 2, 245-258.
8. Goel A. K., Sindhu S. S., Dadarwal K. R., 2000. Pigment diverse mutant of Pseudomonas sp. inhibition of fungal growth and stimulation of growth of Cicer arietinum. Biol. Planet. 43, 4, 563-569.
9. Hamdan H., Weller D. M., Thomashow L. S., 1991. Relative importance of fluorescent siderophores and other factors in biological control of Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici by Pseudomonas fluorescens 2-79 and M4-80R. App. Envir. Microbiol. 57, 3270-3277.
10. Henry M. B., Lynch J. M., Fermon T. R., 1991. Role of siderophores in the biocontrol of Pseudomonas tolaasii by fluorescens pseudomonad antagonists. J. App. Bacter. 70, 104-108.
11. Howie W. J., Suslov T. V., 1991. Role of antibiotic biosyntesis in the inhibition of Pythium ultimum in cotton spermosphere and rhizosphere by Pseudomonas fluorescens. Molec. PlantMicrobe Inter. 4, 393-399.
12. Jain K., WenXi W., BaiGe Z., XiaoCheng S., 1999. Studies on Bacillus subtilis B-903 strain. Inhibitiry action and control effect on plant pathogenic fungi. Chinese J. Biol. Control 15, 4, 157-161.
13. Lewosz J., 2002. Wykorzystanie mikroorganizmów antagonistycznych wobec patogenów roślin w ochronie roślin. Mat. XLII Sesji Nauk. IOR, Poznań: pp 35.
14. Manwar A. V., Vaiganker P. D., Bhonge L. S., Chincholkar S. B., 2000. In vitro suppression of plant pathogens by siderophores of fluorescent Pseudomonas. Indian J. Microbiol. 40, 2, 109-112.
15. Martyniuk S., Masiak D., Stachyra A., Myśków W., 1991. Populacje drobnoustrojów strefy korzeniowej różnych traw i ich antagonizm w stosunku do Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici. Pam. Puł. Pr. IUNG 98, 139-144.
16. Oktaba W., 1987. Metody statystyki matematycznej w doświadczalnictwie. PWN, Warszawa, 488 pp.
17. Patkowska E., Pastucha A., 2005. Skuteczno p ynów pohodowlanych bakterii antagonistycznych w ochronie soi przed grzybami odglebowymi. Acta Agrobotanica, 58, (2), 125-136.
18. Piȩta D., Pastucha A., Patkowska E., 1998. The efficiency of microbiological dressing of soybean seed (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) against root and stem base disease. Ann. Agric. Sci. ser. E, Plant Prot., 95, 1/2, 103-109.
19. Piȩta D., Patkowska E., 2003. The role of antagonistic fungi and bacteria limiting the occurrence of some phytopathogenes inhabiting the soybean soil environment. EJPAU, Horticulture, 6, 2. www.ejpau.media.pl
20. Piȩta D., Patkowska E., Pastucha A., Bełkot M., 2002. Wpływ mikroorganizmów antagonistycznych na ograniczenie porażenia soi przez grzyby chorobotwórcze przeżywaja̧ce w glebie. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus, 1, 1, 23-30.
21. Piȩta D., 2004. Wybrane zagadnienia z fitopatologii. Wyd. AR, Lublin, 96 pp.
22. Rasales A. M., Thomashow L., Cook R. J., Mew T. W., 1995. Isolation and identification of antifungal matabolites produced by rice-associated antagonistic Pseudomonas spp. Phytopathology 85, 1028-1032.
23. Saniewska A., 2000. Antagonistyczny wpływ Bacillus polymyxa na wzrost i rozwój patogenów ro lin ozdobnych. Ochr. Rośl. 7, 39-41.
24. Saniewska A., Orlikowski L. B., Sobiczewski P., 1995. Effectiveness of Bacillus sp. in the control of Phytophthora cryptogea Pethybr. et Laff. M. Mańka (ed.) Environmental biotic factors in integrated plant disease control. Polish Phytopathol. Soc. Poznań, 479-184.
25. th Conf. of EFPP Disease resistance in plant pathology, September 8-14, 2002 Prague, Czech. Republic., 44 pp.
26. Srivastava R., Shalini R., 2008. Antifungal activiti of Pseudomonas fluorescens against different plant pathogenic fungi. EJEFChe, 7, 4, 2789-2796.
27. Yeole R. D., Dube H. C., 2000. Siderophore-mediated antibiosis of rhizobacterial fluorescent pseudomonads against certain soil-borne fungal plant pathogens. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 30, 3, 335-338.