Confronting condescending ethics: How community-based research challenges traditional approaches to consent, confidentiality, and capacity

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 75-85

  Reid, Colleen ^a,b   Brief, Elana ^a  

^a Children's/Women's Health Centre   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community based research; Community confidentiality; Research ethics; Women's health

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949107960     PISSN: 15701727     EISSN: 15728544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-009-9085-0     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Bachmann, Lorenz B. R. (2000). Review of the agricultural knowledge system in Fiji-opportunities and limitations of participatory methods and platforms to promote innovation development. http://edoc. hu-berlin. de/dissertationen/bachmann-lorenz-b-r-2000-12-21/HTML/bachmann-ch3. html. Accessed March 16, 2009.
2. Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Eikeland, O. (2006). Strategies for addressing ethical issues in action research. Action Research, 4(1), 129-131.
3. Eikeland, O. (2006). Condescending ethics and action research. Action Research, 4(1), 37-47.
4. Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19, 173-202.
5. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.) (1988). The action research planner. Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
6. Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Institutional review boards and methodological conservatism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 165-181). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
7. The Loka Institute (2002). About the CRN: What is community based research? http://www. loka. org/conf2002/2002_conference. htm. Accessed February 16, 2009.