Social science in society

Inquiry (United Kingdom)

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 119-138

  Schatzki, Ted ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949105800     PISSN: 0020174X     EISSN: 15023923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/002017402753556652     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Hubert Dreyfus, ‘Why Studies of Human Capacities Modeled on Ideal Natural Science Can Never Achieve Their Goal’, rev. ed. of a paper presented at the Boston Colloquium for the Philosophy of Science, October 1982.
2. Anthony Giddens, New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretive Sociologies (New York: Basic Books, 1978), p. 152.
3. Sheldon Wolin, ‘Political Theory as Vocation’, in Martin Fleisher (ed.), Machiavelli and the Nature of Political Thought (Martin Fleisher [ed.], New York: Atheneum, 1972), pp. 23-76.
4. John H. Holland, Emergence: From Chaos to Order (Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley, 1998), p. 241.
5. Terence Irwin (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1985), 1140b4-5.
6. ‘Theory at Bay: Foucault, Lyotard, and Politics of the Local’, in John Paul Jones III, Wolfgang Natter, and Theodore R. Schatzki (eds), Postmodern Contentions: Epochs, Politics, Space (New York: Guilford, 1993), pp. 39-64.
7. Lawrence Grossberg, ‘Cultural Studies: What’s in a Name? (One More Time)’, in his Bringing It All Back Home: Essays on Cultural Studies (Durham: Duke University Press, 1997), pp. 245-71.
8. Carl Schmidt, The Concept of the Political, trans. George Schwab (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996).
9. Chantal Mouffe, The Return of the Political (London: Verso, 1993).