Regulating human participants protection in medical research and the accreditation of medical research ethics committees in the Netherlands

Journal of Academic Ethics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 33-43

  Kenter, Marcel J H ^a  

^a Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accreditation; Clinical trial; Ethics; Medical research; Review; The Netherlands; Trial registry

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949098464     PISSN: 15701727     EISSN: 15728544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-009-9091-2     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Brown, J. M. (2009). The impact of clinical trials legislation on clinical pharmacology: problems and solutions. Br J Clin Pharm, 67, 487-493.
2. Gunsalus, C. H., Bruner, E. M., Bruburles, N. C., Dash, L., Finkin, M., Goldberg, J. P., et al. (2006). Mission creep in the IRB world. Science, 312, 1441.
3. Keim, B. (2007). Tied up in red tape, European trials shut down. Nat Med, 13, 110.
4. Kenter, M. J. H., & Cohen, A. F. (2006). Establishing risk of human experimentation with drugs: lessons from TGN1412. Lancet, 368, 1387-1291.
5. Kenter, M. J. H. (2008). Legislation and Review of Medical Research with Minors in the Netherlands. Eur J Health Law, 15, 145-151.
6. Ritter, J. M. (2009). Research governance: the Dutch defence. Br J Clin Pharm, 67, 485-486.
7. Saunders, J. (2002). Research ethics committees-time for change? Clin Med, 2, 534-538.
8. Savulescu, J. (2002). Two deaths and two lessons: it is time to review the structure and function of research committees? J Med Ethics, 28, 1-2.
9. Steinbrook, R. (2005). Gag clauses in clinical-trial agreements. N Eng J Med, 352, 2202-2010.
10. Stewart, P. M., Stears, A., Tomlinson, J. W., & Brown, M. J. (2008). Regulation-the real threat to clinical research. BMJ, 337, 1085-1087.