Saproxylic beetles in high stumps and residual downed wood on clear-cuts and in forest edges

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 403-416

  Fossestøl, Knut Olav ^a   Sverdrup Thygeson, Anne ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Beetles (Coleoptera); Boreal forest management; Retention; Saproxylic; Sun exposure

Indexed keywords

BOREAL FORESTS; COLEOPTERA; DEAD WOOD; FIELD EXPERIMENT; FOREST EDGE; HABITAT PREFERENCES; MANAGED FOREST; RESIDUAL WOOD; RETENTION; SAPROXYLIC; SAPROXYLIC BEETLES; SHADED FORESTS; SPECIES RICHNESS; SPRUCE TREES; WINDTHROWN;

GRAPH THEORY; LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES;

FORESTRY;

DEAD WOOD; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; INSECTS;

COLEOPTERA; PICEA;

EID: 70949098230     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: 16511891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827580903143871     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Anon. (2003). Svensk FSC-standard for certifiering av skogsbruk. Remissupplaga 030408 [Swedish FSC-standard for forest certification. Draft document 030408]. Retrieved from http://www.fsc-sverige.org/standard/Remiss/remiss.htm
2. Anon. (2006). Living forest. Standard for sustainable forest management in Norway. Brochure retrieved from http://www.levendeskog.no/levendeskog/vedlegg/levende_skog_standard_engelsk_18.06.2007_11.43.18.pdf
3. Bakke, A. & Lekander, B. (1965). Studies on Hylobius abietis L. II. The influence of exposure on the development and production of Hylobius abietis, illustrated through one Norwegian and one Swedish experiment. Meddelelser fra Det norske Skogforsøksvesen, 20, 117-135.
4. Balevièius, K. (1992). Lietuvos raudonoji knyga [Red data book of Lithuania]. Vilnius: Lietuvos Respublikos aplinkos apsaugos departementas.
5. Bouget, C. & Duelli, P. (2004). The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 118, 281-299.
6. ter Braak, C. J. F. & Simlauer, P. (1997-2002). Canoco for Windows. Wageningen: Biometrics Plant Research International.
7. Burton, P. J., Messier, C., Adamowicz, W. L. & Kuuluvainen, T. (2006). Sustainable management of Canada's boreal forests: Progress and prospects. Ecoscience, 13, 234-248.
8. Colwell, R. K. (2006). EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples (Version 8.0). Storrs, CT: University of Connecticut.
9. Colwell, R. K., Mao, C. X. & Chang, J. (2004). Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology, 85, 2717-2727.
10. Crawley, M. J. (2005). Statistics: An introduction using R. Chichester: Wiley.
11. Davies, Z. G., Tyler, C., Stewart, G. B. & Pullin, A. S. (2008). Are current management recommendations for saproxylic invertebrates effective? A systematic review. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 209-234.
12. Ehnstrom, B. (2001). Leaving dead wood for insects in boreal forests*Suggestions for the future. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 91-98.
13. Ehnstrom, B. & Axelsson, R. (2002). Insektsgnag i bark och ved [Galleries and exit holes of insects living in bark and wood]. Uppsala: Artdatabanken, SLU.
14. Ejrnæs, R., Bruun, H. H. & Graae, B. J. (2006). Community assembly in experimental grasslands: Suitable environment or timely arrival? Ecology, 87, 1225 1233.
15. Ekbom, B., Schroeder, L. M. & Larsson, S. (2006). Stand specific occurrence of coarse woody debris in a managed boreal forest landscape in central Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 221, 2-12.
16. Fortin, M.-J. & Dale, M. R. T. (2005). Spatial analysis: A guide for ecologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fossestøl, K. O. (2008). Life-cycle trees of Norway spruce (Picea abies): At the forest-edge or on the clear cut? Masters thesis, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (UMB).
18. Fridman, J. & Walheim, M. (2000). Amount, structure, and dynamics of dead wood on managed forestland in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 131, 23-26.
19. Gardenfors, U. (2005). The 2005 red list of Swedish species. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet.
20. Gibb, H., Ball, J. P., Johansson, T., Atlegrim, O., Hjalten, J. & Danell, K. (2005). Effects of management on coarse woody debris volume and composition in boreal forests in northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 213-222.
21. Gibb, H., Pettersson, R. B., Hjalten, J., Hilszczanski, J., Ball, J. P., Johansson, T., et al. (2006). Conservation-oriented forestry and early successional saproxylic beetles: Responses of functional groups to manipulated dead wood substrates. Biological Conservation, 129, 437-450.
22. Gotelli, N. J. & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: Procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 379-391.
23. Hautala, H. & Vanha-Majamaa, I. (2006). Immediate tree uprooting after retention-felling in a coniferous boreal forest in Fennoscandia. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 3167-3172.
24. Hedgren, P. O. & Schroeder, L. M. (2004). Reproductive success of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (L.) and occurrence of associated species: A comparison between standing beetle-killed trees and cut trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 203, 241-250.
25. Heilmann-Clausen, J., Aude, E. & Christensen, M. (2005). Cryptogam communities on decaying deciduous wood* Does tree species diversity matter? Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 2061-2078.
26. Hjalten, J., Johansson, T., Alinvi, O., Danell, K., Ball, J. P., Pettersson, R., et al. (2007). The importance of substrate type, shading and scorching for the attractiveness of dead wood to saproxylic beetles. Basic and Applied Ecology, 8, 364-376.
27. Hunter, M. L. J. (1990). Wildlife, forest and forestry. Principles of managing forests for biological diversity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Johansson, T., Gibb, H., Hjalten, J., Pettersson, R. B., Hilszczanski, J., Alinvi, O., et al. (2007a). The effects of substrate manipulations and forest management on predators of saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 518-529.
29. Johansson, T., Hjalten, J., Hilszczanski, J., Stenlid, J., Ball, J. P., Alinvi, O. & Danell, K. (2007b). Variable response of different functional groups of saproxylic beetles to substrate manipulation and forest management: Implications for conservation strategies. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 496-510.
30. Jonsell, M. & Weslien, J. (2003). Felled or standing retained wood*It makes a difference for saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecology and Management, 175, 425-435.
31. Jonsell, M., Weslien, J. & Ehnstrom, B. (1998). Substrate requirements of red-listed saproxylic invertebrates in Sweden. Biodiversity and Conservation, 7, 749-764.
32. Jonsell, M., Schroeder, M. & Weslien, J. (2005). Saproxylic beetles in high stumps of spruce: Fungal flora important for determining the species composition. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 54-62.
33. Jonsson, B. G., Kruys, N. & Ranius, T. (2005). Ecology of species living on dead wood*Lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fennica, 39, 289-309.
34. Jonsson, M. T., Fraver, S., Jonsson, B. G., Dynesius, M., Rydgard, M. & Esseen, P.-A. (2007). Eighteen years of tree mortality and structural change in an experimentally fragmented Norway spruce forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 306-313.
35. Joseph, G., Kelsey, R. G., Peck, R. W. & Niwa, C. G. (2001). Response of some scolytids and their predators to ethanol and 4-allylanisole in pine forests of central Oregon. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27, 697-715.
36. Kaila, L., Martikainen, P., Punttila, P. & Yakovlev, E. (1994). Saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) on dead birch trunks decayed by different polypore species. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 31,97-107.
37. Kålås, J. A., Viken, Å. & Bakken, T. (2006). Norwegian red list, 416. Trondheim: Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre. (In Norwegian and English.)
38. Kelsey, R. G. & Joseph, G. (1999a). Ethanol and ambrosia beetles in Douglas fir logs exposed or protected from rain. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25, 2793-2809.
39. Kelsey, R. G. & Joseph, G. (1999b). Ethanol and water in Pseudotsuga menziesii and Pinus ponderosa stumps. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 25, 2779-2792.
40. Kelsey, R. G. & Joseph, G. (2001). Attraction of Scolytus unispinosus bark beetles to ethanol in water-stressed Douglas-fir branches. Forest Ecology and Management, 144, 229-238.
41. Kenis, M., Wermelinger, B. & Grégoire, J. C. (2004). Research on parasitoids and predators of Scolytidae*A review. In: F. Lieutier (Ed.), Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Springer, Dordrecht.
42. Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical ecology (2nd English ed.). Developments in Environmental Modelling, 20. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
43. Lilleleht, V. (1998). Red data book of Estonia. Tartu: Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia. Looduskaite komisjon. Available in English at http://www.zbi.ee/punane/english/index.html
44. Lindhe, A. & Lindelow, Å. (2004). Cut high stumps of spruce, birch, aspen and oak as breeding substrates for saproxylic beetles. Forest Ecology and Management, 203, 1-20.
45. Lindhe, A., Lindelow, A. & Asenblad, N. (2005). Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 3033-3053.
46. Maleque, M. A., Ishii, H. T. & Maeto, K. (2006). The use of arthropods as indicators of ecosystem integrity in forest management. Journal of Forestry, 104, 113 117.
47. Martikainen, P. & Kouki, J. (2003). Sampling the rarest: Threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 1815-1831.
48. Martikainen, P., Siitonen, J., Kaila, L., Punttila, P. & Rauh, J. (1999). Bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and associated beetle species in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 116,233-245.
49. Moran, M. D. (2003). Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos, 100, 403-405.
50. Muller, J., Bussler, H., Gossner, M., Rettelbach, T. & Duelli, P. (2008). The European spruce bark beetle Ips typographus in a national park: From pest to keystone species. Biodiversity and Conservation, 17, 2979-3001.
51. Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre (2006). Red list database. Retrieved from http://www.artsdatabanken.no/Article.aspx?m39&amid1864 (In Norwegian).
52. Økland, R. H. (1990). Vegetation ecology: Theory, methods and applications with reference to Fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia, Suppl. 1, 1-233. Oslo: Botanisk hage og museum.
53. Økland, R. H. (1996). Are ordination and constrained ordination alternative or complementary strategies in general ecological studies? Journal of Vegetation Science, 7, 289-292.
54. Pedlar, J. H., Pearce, J. L., Venier, L. A. & McKenney, D. W. (2002). Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 158,189-194.
55. PEFC-Norway (2005). Application for certification scheme re-assessment (PEFC/03-1-01). Oslo: PEFC-Norway.
56. Peltonen, M. (1999). Windthrows and dead-standing trees as bark beetle breeding material at forest-clearcut edge. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 14, 505-511.
57. Rangel, T., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. & Bini, L. M. (2006). Towards an integrated computational tool for spatial analysis in macro-ecology and biogeography. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 15,321-327.
58. Rassi, P., Alanen, A., Kanerva, T. & Mannerkoski, I. (2001). The 2000 red list of Finnish species. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment and Finnish Environment Institute. (In Finnish with English summary.)
59. Rosenvald, R. & Lohmus, A. (2008). For what, when, and where is green-tree retention better than clear-cutting? A review of the biodiversity aspects. Forest Ecology and Management, 255, 1-15.
60. Saint-Germain, M., Buddle, C. M. & Drapeau, P. (2006). Sampling saproxylic Coleoptera: Scale issues and the importance of behavior. Environmental Entomology, 35, 478-487.
61. Saint-Germain, M., Buddle, C. M. & Drapeau, P. (2007). Primary attraction and random landing in host-selection by wood-feeding insects: A matter of scale? Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 9, 227-235.
62. Sall, J., Ng, K., Hecht, M., Potter, R., Corcoran, B., Zangi, A. D., et al. (1989 2002). JMP. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
63. Saproxylic Database. Retrieved from http://www.saproxylic.org/
64. Schroeder, L. M., Weslien, J., Lindelow, A. & Lindhe, A. (1999). Attacks by bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera on mechanically created high stumps of Norway spruce in the two years following cutting. Forest Ecology and Management, 123, 21-30.
65. Schroeder, L. M., Ranius, T., Ekbom, B. & Larsson, S. (2006). Recruitment of saproxylic beetles in high stumps created for maintaining biodiversity in a boreal forest landscape. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 2168-2178.
66. Siitonen, J. (2001). Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forest as an example. Ecological Bulletin, 49, 11-41.
67. Silfverberg, H. (2004). Enumeratio nova Coleopterorum Fennos-candia, Daniae et Baltiae. Sahlbergia, 9, 1-111.
68. Simila, M., Kouki, J. & Martikainen, P. (2003). Saproxylic beetles in managed and seminatural Scots pine forests: Quality of dead wood matters. Forest Ecology and Management, 174, 365-381.
69. Spence, J. R. (2001). The new boreal forestry: Adjusting timber management to accommodate biodiversity. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 591-593.
70. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. & Birkemoe, T. (2008). What window traps can tell us: Effect of placement, forest openness and beetle reproduction in retention trees. Journal of Insect Conservation. Published online: DOI 10.1007/s10841-008-9141-x
71. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A. & Ims, R. A. (2002). The effect of forest clearcutting in Norway on the community of saproxylic beetles on aspen. Biological Conservation, 106, 347-357.
72. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Borg, P. & Bergsaker, E. (2005). Miljøhensyn på hogstflatene-Før og etter Levende Skog [Environmental considerations in clearcuts-Before and after the forest certification system Living Forest] (NORSKOG-rapport 2005-1). Oslo: NORSKOG.
73. Sverdrup-Thygeson, A., Borg, P. & Bergsaker, E. (2008). A comparison of biodiversity values in boreal forest regeneration areas before and after forest certification. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 236-243.
74. Toivanen, T., Liikanen, V. & Kotiaho, J. S. (2009). Effects of forest restoration treatments on the abundance of bark beetles in Norway spruce forests of southern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 257, 117-125.
75. Vanha-Majamaa, I. & Jalonen, J. (2001). Green tree retention in Fennoscandian forestry. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 79-90.
76. Wermelinger, B., Fluckiger, P. F., Obrist, M. K. & Duelli, P. (2007). Horizontal and vertical distribution of saproxylic beetles (Col., Buprestidae, Cerambycidae, Scolytinae) across sections of forest edges. Journal of Applied Entomology, 131, 104-114.
77. Wikars, L. O., Sahlin, E. & Ranius, T. (2005). A comparison of three methods to estimate species richness of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) in logs and high stumps of Norway spruce. Canadian Entomologist, 137, 304-324.
78. Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.