Choosing the risk curve type;Rizikos kreivės tipo parinkimas

Technological and Economic Development of Economy

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 341-351

  Vlasenko, Olga ^a   Kozlov, Sergey ^a  

^a BELARUSIAN NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Belarus)

Author keywords

Loss level; Normal distribution; Probability; Representative points; Risk curve; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 70949085076     PISSN: 20294913     EISSN: 20294921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.341-351     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Armin, F. 1997. Risk analysis in project management, International Journal of Project Management 5(1): 29-36.
2. Bernstain, P. 2000. Against Gods: risk taming. Moscow: Olimp-Business. 404 p.
3. Geoff, K. 1999. Risk management systems, Risk Professional 2(1): 19-31.
4. Dembo, R. S.; Aziz, A.; Rosen, D.; Zerbs, M. 2000. Mark to future. A framework for measuring risk and reward, Algorithmics Publications 5: 34-39.
5. Hardle, W. K.; Hautsch, N.; Overbeck, L. 2006. Applied quantitative finance. Berlin: Springer Heidelberg. 464 p.
6. Hizrich, P.; Peters, M. 1999. Risk and uncertainty. Moscow: Progress. 657 p.
7. Johnstone, D. J. 2007. The value of a probability forecast, Theory and Decision 63 (2): 78-95.
8. Riseberg, B.A. 1992. Enterpreneural risk. Moscow: Progress. 476 p.
9. Roland, K. 2001. Towards a grand unified theory of risk, International Journal of Project Management 4(4): 61-69.
10. Sharp, W.; Alexander, G.; Bailey, J. 1999. Investments. Moscow: Infra-M. 1028 p.
11. Van Horn, G. K.; Vahovich, J. M. 2001. Basics of financial management. Moscow: Williams. 992 p.
12. Russain Source. 2000. Russain Source. 387 c.
13. Russain Source. 1998. Russain Source. 402 c.
14. Russain Source. 1999. Russain Source. 564 c.
15. Russain Source. 2001. Russain Source. 239 c.