Mapping innovative activity using microdata

Applied Economics Letters

Volumn 16, Issue 18, 2009, Pages 1795-1799

  Conte, Andrea ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b Growth and Public Policy   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ECONOMETRICS; FIRM SIZE; INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; MEASUREMENT METHOD; MODEL TEST; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 70849133719     PISSN: 13504851     EISSN: 14664291     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13504850701719553     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. (1990) Innovation and Small Firms, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass).
2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. and Feldman, M. P. (1994) R&D spillovers and recipient firm size, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 4, 336-40.
3. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002) R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium, The American Economic Review, 92, 1169-84.
4. Cragg, J. G. (1971) Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods, Econometrica, 39, 829-44.
5. Deaton, A. (1997) The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
6. Freeman, C. (1982) The Economics of Industrial Innovation. 2nd edn, Pinter, London.
7. Freeman, C. and Soete, L. (1987) Technical Change and Full Employment, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
8. Griliches, Z. (1979) Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth, The Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.
9. Griliches, Z. (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28,1661-707.
10. Hall, B. H. and Mairesse, J. (1995) Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms, Journal of Econometrics, 65, 263-93.
11. Hausman, J. A. (1978) Specification tests in econometrics, Econometrica, 46, 1251-71.
12. ISTAT. (2004) Statistiche sull' Innovazione delle Imprese. Settore Industria. Anni 1998-2000, Rome.
13. Lin, T.-F. and Schmidt, P. (1984) A test of the Tobit specification against an alternative suggested by Cragg, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 66, 174-7.
14. Loof, H. and Heshmati, A. (2002) Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm-level innovation study, International Journal of Production Economics, 76,61-85.
15. Mairesse, J. and Mohnen, P. (2002) Accounting for innovation and measuring innovativeness: an illustrative framework and an application, The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 92,226-30.
16. Piga, C. A. and Vivarelli, M. (2004) Internal and external R&D: a sample selection approach, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66, 457-82.
17. Tobin, J. (1958) Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables, Econo-metrica, 26, 24-36.