Assessing ecological risks of DDT and lindane to freshwater organisms by species sensitivity distributions

Huanjing Kexue Xuebao/Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2407-2414

  Wang, Yin ^a   Wang, Junjun ^a   Qin, Ning ^a   Wu, Wenjing ^a   Zhu, Ying ^a   Xu, Fuliu ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

DDT; Ecological risks; Freshwater organisms; Lindane; Species sensitivity distributions (SSD)

Indexed keywords

CRUSTACEAN; DDT; FISH; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; HCH; INSECT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SPIDER; WATER POLLUTION;

ARANEAE; CRUSTACEA; HEXAPODA; INVERTEBRATA; PISCES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 70849133490     PISSN: 02532468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ciffroy P. 2007. Methods for calculating PNECs using species sensitivity distribution (SSD) with various hypothesis on the way to handle ecotoxicity data [C]. International Conference on the Impact of Environmental Factors on Health 4th, Malta: 237-245
2. CSIRO (Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation). 2008. A Flexible Approach to Species Protection [OL]. 2008-03-01. http://www.cmis.csiro.au/envir/burrlioz/
3. European Commission. 1996. Technical guidance document in support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substance and commission regulation 5EC no 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substance. Part II [S]. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
4. De Zwart D. 2002. Observed regularities in species sensitivity distribution for aquatic species//Posthuma L, Traas T P, Suter G W. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology [M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis. 133-154
5. Dou W, Zhao Z X. 1998. Contamination of DDT and BHC in water, sediments and fish (Carassius Auratus) muscle from Baiyangdian Lake [J]. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 18 (3): 308-312 (in Chinese)
6. Duboudin C, Cliffroy P, Magaud H. 2004a. Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23 (2): 489-499
7. Duboudin C, Cliffroy P, Magaud H. 2004b. Acute-to-chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 23 (7): 1774-1785
8. Forbes V E, Calow P. 2002. Species sensitivity distributions revisited: A critical appraisal [J]. Hum Ecolo Risk Assess, 8: 473-492
9. Kooijman S A L M. 1987. A safety factor for LC50 values allowing for differences in sensitivity among species [J]. Water Research, 21: 269-276
10. Hose G C, Van den Brink P J. 2004. Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data [J]. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 47: 511-520
11. Luo S C, Yu H S. 1998. Studies of content and distribution of BHC and DDT in the waters at the Pearl River estuary [J]. Marine Science Bulletin, 17 (3): 32-38 (in Chinese)
12. Newman M C, Ownby D R, Mezin L C A, et al. 2000. Applying species-sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 19 (2): 508-515
13. Posthuma L, Traas T P, Suter G W. 2002. General introduction to species sensitivity distributions//Posthuma L, Traas T P, Suter G W. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology [M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis. 3-9
14. RIVM (National Institute of Public Health and the Environment). 1999. Environmental risk limits [R]. RIVM Report 601640001. Bilthoven, The Netherlands
15. Shao Q. 2000. Estimation for hazardous concentrations based on NOEC toxicity data: An alternative approach [J]. Environmetrics, 11: 583-595
16. Shi Z, Pan B, He X C, et al. 2004. DDT and its metabolites in water, suspended solid, sediment and fish in fishponds in Tianjin [J]. Rural Eco Environment, 20 (4): 1-5 (in Chinese)
17. Traas T P, Van de Meent D, Posthuma L, et al. 2002. The potentially affected fraction as a measure of ecological risk // Posthuma L, Traas T P, Suter G W. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology [M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis. 315-343
18. Van den Brink P J, Posthuma L, Brock T C M. 2002. The value of the species sensitivity distribution concept for predicting field effects: (Non-) confirmation of the concept using semi-field experiments//Posthuma L, Traas T P, Suter G W. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology [M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis. 155-193
19. Van Straalen N M. 2002a. Theory of ecological risk assessment based on species sensitivity distributions//Posthuma L, Traas T P, Suter G W. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology [M]. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis. 37-48
20. Van Straalen N M. 2002b. Threshold models for species sensitivity distributions applied to aquatic risk assessment for zinc [J]. Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, 11: 167-172
21. Wang B, Yu G, Huang J, et al. 2008. Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC5 of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches [J]. Ecotoxicology 17: 716-724
22. Wheeler J R, Grist E P M, Leung K M Y, et al. 2002. Species sensitivity distributions: Data and model choice [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 45: 192-202