Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Loneliness at Work Scale;İş yaşaminda yalnizlik ölçeǧi Türkçe formunun geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalişmasi

Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 271-277

  Doǧan, Tayfun ^a   Çetin, Bayram ^a   Sungur, Mehmet Z ^b  

^a SAKARYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b MARMARA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Loneliness at Work Scale (LAWS); Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; CRONBACH ALPHA COEFFICIENT; EMOTIONAL DEPRIVATION; EMPLOYEE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; JOB SATISFACTION; JOB SATISFACTION SCALE; LONELINESS AT WORK SCALE; MALE; ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT SCALE; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL LIFE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY;

EID: 70849121837     PISSN: 13026631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Duck S. Staying healthy with a little help from friends? S Duck (Ed.), Human Relationships: An Introduction to Social Psychology, Newbury Park, Sage, 1991.
2. Peplau, LA, Perlman, D. Perspectives on loneliness. LA Peplau, D Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy, New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1982, p.1-18.
3. Goodwin R, Cook O, Yung Y. Loneliness and life satisfaction in three cultural groups. Pers Relatsh 2001; 8:225-230. (Pubitemid 33282221)
4. Di Tomasso E, Brannen C, Best LA. Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educ Psychol Meas 2004; 64:99-119. (Pubitemid 38134916)
5. Duy B. Bilişsel Davranişçi Yaklaşima Dayali Grupla Psikolojik Danişmanin Yalnizlik ve Fonksiyonel Olmayan Tutumlar Üzerine Etkisi. Yayimlanmamiş Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Ankara Üniv., Eǧitim Bilimleri Enst., 2003.
6. Lynch J. The Broken Heart: The Medical Consequences of Loneliness, New York, Basic Books, 1977.
7. Rokach A, Neto F. Coping with loneliness in adolescence: A cross-cultural study. Soc Behav Pers 2000; 28:329-342.
8. Weiss RS. Reflections on the present state of loneliness research. J Soc Behav Pers 1987; 2:1-16.
9. Wiseman H, Guttfreund DG. Gender differences in loneliness and depression of university students seeking counselling. Br J Guid Couns 1995; 23:231-245.
10. Wright SL. Loneliness in the Workplace. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Christchurch (New Zealand), University of Canterbury, 2005.
11. Wright SL, Burt CDB, Strongman KT. Loneliness in the workplace: Construct definition and scale development. NZ J Psychol 2006; 35:59-68.
12. Şeker H, Gençdoǧan B. Psikolojide ve Eǧitimde Ölçme Araci Geliştirme. Ankara, Nobel Yayin Daǧitim, 2006.
13. Hackman RJ, Oldham GG. Work Redesign. California, Addison-Wesley Publishing, 1980.
14. Güler M. Endüstri işçilerinin iş doyumu ve iş verimine depresyon, kaygi ve diǧer bazi deǧiş kenlerin etkisi. Yayinlanmamiş Doktora Tezi, Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 1990.
15. Ergeç A. İş doyumunun belirleyicileri olarak beklenti algilama tutarsizliǧi ve çalişma deǧerleri. Yönetim Psikolojisi II, Ankara, Sevinç Matbaasi, 1980.
16. Meyer JP, Allen NJ. Testing the side bet theory of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. J Appl Psychol 1984; 69:372-378.
17. Yalçin A, İplik FN. Beş yildizli otellerde çalişanlarin demografik özellikleri ile örgütsel baǧliliklari arasindaki ilişkiyi belirlemeye yönelik bir araştirma: Adana ili örneǧi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2005; 14:395-412.
18. Büyüköztürk Ş. Veri Analizi El Kitabi. Ankara, Pegem A Yayincilik, 2004.
19. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 1980; 88:588-606.
20. Bentler PM. Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Ann Rev Psychol 1980; 31:419-456.
21. Marsh HW, Hau KT, Artelt C, Baumert J, Peschar JL. OECD's brief self-report measure of educational psychology's most useful affective constructs: cross-cultural, psychometric comparisons across 25 countries. Int J Test 2006; 6:311-360.
22. Byrne BM, Campbell TL. Cross-cultural comparisons and the presumption of equivalent measurement and theoretical structure: a look beneath the surface. J Cross Cult Psychol 1999; 30:555-574.
23. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. KA Bollen, JS Long (Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models, Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993, p.136-162.
24. Meyer JP, Allen NJ. Commitment in the Workplace. Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications, 1997.