Research on the effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) has increased, but this review is not very systematic

Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 136-140

  Beck, Ann R ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERVENTION STUDY; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 70849111843     PISSN: 17489539     EISSN: 17489547     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17489530903182228     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (1994). The picture exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1-19.
2. Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). Picture Exchange Communication System training manual (2nd ed.). Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Consultants.
3. Hegde, M. N. (1994). Clinical research in communicative disorders: Principles and strategies (2nd ed.). Austin, Texas: Pro-ed.
4. Schlosser, R. W. (2003). Single-subject experimental design. In R. Schlosser (Ed.), The efficacy of augmentative and alternative communication: Toward evidence-based practice (pp. 85-143). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5. Schlosser, R. W., Wendt, O., & Sigafoos, J. (2007). Not all reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 1, 138-150.