Design and implementation of an architectural framework for web portals in a ubiquitous pervasive environment

Sensors

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 5201-5223

  Raza, Muhammad Taqi ^a   Yoo, Seung Wha ^b   Kim, Ki Hyung ^b   Joo, Seong Soon ^a   Jeong, Wun Cheol ^a  

^a Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)   (South Korea)

^b Ajou University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Ubiquitous era (U era); Ubiquitous Sensor Networks (USN); Web portal

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL FRAMEWORKS; DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATIONS; IP-BASED WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS; PERVASIVE ENVIRONMENTS; REAL TIME MEASUREMENTS; REAL-TIME INFORMATION FLOWS; UBIQUITOUS ERA (U-ERA); UBIQUITOUS SENSOR NETWORKS;

DIGITAL DEVICES; GATEWAYS (COMPUTER NETWORKS); TESTBEDS; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

PORTALS;

EID: 70849107979     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s90705201     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Fukunaga, S.; Tagawa, T.; Fukui, K.; Tanimoto, K.; Kannoet, H. Development of Ubiquitous Sensor Network. Oki Tech. Rev. 2004, 71, 24-29.
2. Crossbow Mica motes: http://www.xbow.com/.
3. Smart-its: http://www.smart-its.org/.
4. Kawahara, Y.; Minami, M.; Morikawa, H.; Aoyama, T. Design and Implementation of a Sensor Network Node for Ubiquitous Computing Environment. IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2003-Fall, Orlando, FL, USA, October 6-9, 2003.
5. Gibbons, P.B.; Karp, B.; Ke, Y.; Nath, S.; Srinivasan, S. IrisNet: An Architecture for a Worldwide Sensor Web. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2003, 22-33.
6. A Sensor Model Language: http://www.sensorsmag.com/articles/0403/30/main.shtml.
7. Culler, D. Secure, Low-power, IP-based Connectivity with IEEE 802.15.4 Wireless Networks, 2007. Available online: http://www.archrock.com/downloads/resources/ArchRock.Sum07.pdf.
8. Stankovic, J.A. When Sensor and Actuator Networks Cover the World. ETRI J. 2008, 30, 627-633.
9. Kuzmanovic, A.; Knightly, E.W. Receiver-Centric Congestion Control with a Misbehaving Receiver: Vulnerabilities and End-point Solutions. Elsevier Comput. Network. 2007, 51, 2717-2737.
10. Delin, K.A. The Sensor Web: A Distributed, Wireless Monitoring System. Sensors Mag. April 1, 2004.
11. Sensor Web: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensor_Web.
12. Botts, M.; McKee, L. A Sensor Model Language: Moving Sensor Data onto the Internet. Sensors Mag. April 1, 2003.
13. Delicato, F.; Pires, P.; Pirmez, L.; Carmo, L. A Service Approach for Architecting Application Independent Wireless Sensor Networks. Cluster Comput. 2005, 8, 211-221.
14. Sivavakeesar, S.; Gonzalez, O.F.; Pavlou, G. Service Discovery Strategies in Ubiquitous Communication Environments. IEEE Comm. Mag. 2006, 44, 106-113.
15. Riem-Vis, R. Cold Chain Management using an Ultra Low Power Wireless Sensor Network. Workshop on Applications of Mobile Embedded Systems, Boston, MA, USA, 2004; pp. 21-23.
16. Romer K.; Mattern, F. Design Space of Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Wireless Commun. 2004, 11, 54-61.
17. Berkeley, U.C.; Co, M.L.B. The 29 Palms Experiment: Tracking vehicles with a UAV-delivered sensor network. Twentynine, Palms, CA, March 12-14, 2001. Available at: http://robotics.eecs.berkeley.edu/~pister/29Palms0103/.
18. Xue, W.; Luo, Q.; Chen, L.; Liu, Y. Contour Map Matching for Event Detection in Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, Chicago, IL, USA, 2006; pp. 145-156.
19. Abadi, D.J.; Madden, S.; Lindner, W. REED: Robust, Efficient Filtering and Event Detection in Sensor Networks, 2005. Citable URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30452.
20. Guralnik, V.; Srivastava, J. Event Detection from Time Series Data. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, ACM: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 33-42.
21. Intel Lab Data. URL: http://berkeley.intel-research.net/labdata/.
22. th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB'03), Berlin, Germany, September 9-12, 2003.
23. Szewczyk, R.; Polastre, J.; Mainwaring, A.; Culler, D. Lessons from a Sensor Network Expedition. EWSN 2004: European workshop on wireless sensor networks, Berlin, Germany, 2004; pp. 307-322.
24. Shah R.C.; Roy, S.; Jain, S.; Brunette, W. Data MULEs: Modeling a Three-Tier Architecture for Sparse Sensor Networks, 1st IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2003; pp. 30-41.
25. Kulkarni P.; Ganesan, D.; Shenoy, P.; Lu, Q.F. SensEye: A Multi-tier Camera Sensor Network. 13th Annual ACM international Conference on Multimedia, Singapore, November 06-11, 2005; pp. 229-238.
26. Yap, K.K.; Srinivasan, V.; Motani, M. MAX: Human-Centric Search of the Physical World. SenSys'05, San Diego, CA, USA, 2005.
27. Duan, Z.; Dong, Y.F.; Gopalan, K. Push vs. Pull: Implications of Protocol Design on Controlling Unwanted Traffic. USENIX Steps to Reducing Unwanted Traffic on the Internet Workshop, SRUTI'06, San Jose, CA, USA, 2005.
28. HTTP Performance Overview: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/Performance/.
29. Web sites handle the load of millions of visitors: http://computer.howstuffworks.com/question342.htm.
30. Gutierrez, J.A. Wireless Medium Access Control and Physical Layer Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks. IEEE Press: New York, NY, USA, September 2006.
31. 802.11 Technical Section: http://wifi.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/wifistandard.html.
32. Vogels, W. Learning from the Amazon technology platform-ACM Queue 4(4), June 5, 2006.
33. Bhulai, S.; Sivasubramanian, S.; van der Mei, R.; van Steen, M. Analysis of End to End Response Time of Multi Tier Internet Service. Technical Report WS2006-11, Vrije Universiteit: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
34. Zhang, W.; He, J.S. Modeling End-to-End Delay Using Pareto Distribution. Second International Conference on Internet Monitoring and Protection, 2007. ICIMP 2007, San Jose, CA, USA, 1-5 July, 2007; p. 21.
35. TCP-Friendly Unicast Rate-Based Flow Control: http://www.psc.edu/networking/papers/tcp_friendly.html#equation2.