Foam delivery of calcium polysulfide to the vadose zone for chromium(vi) immobilization: A laboratory evaluation

Vadose Zone Journal

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 976-985

  Zhong, Lirong ^a   Qafoku, Nikolla P ^a   Szecsody, James E ^a   Dresel, P Evan ^a   Zhang, Zhuanfang F ^a  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; CHROMIUM; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FOAM; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; IMMOBILIZATION; LABORATORY METHOD; MOBILIZATION; POLLUTANT TRANSPORT; REDUCTION; SULFIDE; SURFACTANT; VADOSE ZONE;

EID: 70849083397     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15391663     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2008.0124     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abbasi, S.A., and R. Soni. 1984. Teratogenic effects of chromium(VI) in the environment as evidenced by the impact of larvae of amphibian Rana tigrina: Implications in the environmental management of chromium. Int. J. Environ. Stud. 23:131-137.
2. American Public Health Association. 1989. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 17th ed. APHA, Washington, DC.
3. Bertin, H.J., O.G. Apaydin, L.M. Castanier, and A.R. Kovscek. 1998. Foam flow in heterogeneous porous media: Effect of crossflow. p. 255-264. In Proc. SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symp., 11th, Tulsa, OK. 19-22 Apr. 1998. Soc. Pet. Eng., Richardson, TX.
4. Bikerman, J.J. 1973. Foams. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
5. Chambers, K.T., and C.J. Radke. 1991. Capillary phenomena in foam flow through porous media. p. 191-255. In N.R. Morrow (ed.) Interfacial phenomena in petroleum recovery. Marcel Dekker, New York.
6. Chowdiah, P., B.R. Misra, J.J. Kilbane, II, V.J. Srivastava, and T.D. Hayes. 1998. Foam propagation through soils for enhanced in situ remediation. J. Hazard. Mater. 62:265-280.
7. Dauble, D.D., G.W. Patton, T.M. Poston, and R.E. Peterson. 2003. Evaluation of the effects of chromium on fall chinook salmon in the Hanford Reach of the Columbia River: Integration of recent toxicity test results. PNNL- 14008. Pac. Northw. Natl. Lab., Richland WA.
8. Enzien, M.V., D.L. Michelsen, R.W. Peters, J.X. Bouillard, and J.R. Frank. 1995. Enhanced in situ bioremediation using foams and oil aphrons. p. 503-509. In R.E. Hinchee et al. (ed.) In-situ aeration: Air sparging, bioventing, and related remediation processes. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
9. Foster, R.F. 1957. Recommended limit on addition of dichromate to the Columbia River. HW-49713. General Electric Co., Richland, WA.
10. Gerber, M.A. 1996. The plutonium production story at the Hanford Site: Processes and facilities history. WHC-MR-0521 Rev 0. Westinghouse Hanford Co., Richland, WA.
11. Graham, M.C., J.G. Farmer, P. Anderson, E. Paterson, S. Hillier, D.G. Lumsdon, and R.J.F. Bewley. 2006. Calcium polysulfide remediation of hexavalent chromium contamination from chromite ore processing residue. Sci. Total Environ. 364:32-44.
12. Hanson, A.T., B. Dwyer, Z.A. Samani, and D. York. 1993. Remediation of chromium-containing soils by heap leaching: Column study. J. Environ. Eng. 119:825-841.
13. Hirasaki, G.J., C.A. Miller, R. Szafranski, J.B. Lawson, and N. Akiya. 1997. Surfactant/foam process for aquifer remediation. p. 471. In Proc. SPE Int. Symp. on Oilfield Chemistry, Houston, TX. 18-21 Feb. 1997. Soc. Pet. Eng., Richardson, TX.
14. Holm, L.W. 1968. The mechanism of gas and liquid flow through porous media in the presence of foam. J. Pet. Technol. 8:359-369.
15. Huang, C.W., and C.H. Chang. 2000. A laboratory study on foam-enhanced surfactant solution flooding in removing n-pentadecane from contaminated columns. Colloids Surf. A 173:171-179.
16. Hudales, J.B.N., and H.N. Stein. 1990. The influence of solid particles on foam and film drainage. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 140:307-313.
17. Jacobs, J.A. 2001. In situ delivery methods for remediation of hexavalent chromium in soil and groundwater. In Abstracts of the Association of Engineering Geologists and American Institute of Professional Geologists, St Louis, MO. 5 Oct. 2001. Assoc. Eng. Geol., Denver.
18. Jeong, S.W., and M.Y. Corapcioglu. 2003. Physical model analysis of foam-TCE displacement in porous media. AIChE J. 49:782-788.
19. Jeong, S.W., M.Y. Corapcioglu, and S.E. Roosevelt. 2000. Micromodel study of surfactant foam remediation of residual trichloroethylene. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34:3456-3461.
20. Kovscek, A.R., and H.J. Bertin. 2003. Foam mobility in heterogeneous porous media: II. Experimental observations. Transp. Porous Media 52:37-49.
21. Kovscek, A.R., and C.J. Radke. 1994. Fundamentals of foam transport in porous media. p. 115-164. In L.L. Schramm (ed.) Foams: Fundamentals and applications in the petroleum industry. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.
22. Mocák, J., M. Vaníková, and J. Labuda. 1985. Determination of extractable chromium(VI) in the presence of large excess of chromium(III) in solid materials. Mikrochim. Acta 11:231-246.
23. Moon, D.H., M. Wazne, S.C. Jagupilla, C. Christodoulatos, M.G. Kim, and A. Koutsospyros. 2008. Particle size and pH effects on remediation of chromite ore processing residue using calcium polysulfide (CaS5). Sci. Total Environ. 399:2-10.
24. Mulligan, C.N., and F. Eftekhari. 2003. Remediation with surfactant foam of PCP-contaminated soil. 2003. Eng. Geol. 70:269-279.
25. Mulligan, C.N., and S. Wang. 2006. Remediation of a heavy metal-contaminated soil by a rhamnolipid foam. Eng. Geol. 85:75-81.
26. Olson, P.A. 1960. Toxicity of chromium to fish. HW-SA-1956. General Electric Co., Richland, WA.
27. Ono, B.I. 1988. Genetic approaches in the study of chromium toxicity and resistance in yeast and bacteria. p. 351-368. In J.O. Nriagu and E. Nieboer (ed.) Chromium in the natural and human environments. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
28. Paschin, Y.V., V.I. Kozachenko, and L.E. Sal'nikova. 1983. Differential mutagenic response at HGPRT locus in V-79 and CHO cells after treatment with chromate. Mutat. Res. 122:361-365.
29. Peters, R.W., M.V. Enzien, J.X. Bouillard, J.R. Frank, V.J. Srivastava, J. Kilbane, and T. Hayes. 1994. Nonaqueous phase liquids contaminated soil/ groundwater remediation using foams. p. 1067-1088. In G.W. Gee and N.R. Wing (ed.) In-situ remediation: Scientific basis for current and future technologies. Battelle Press, Columbus, OH.
30. Qafoku, N.P., C.C. Ainsworth, and S.M. Heald. 2007. Cr(VI) fate in mineralogically altered sediments by hyperalkaline waste fluids. Soil Sci. 172:598-613.
31. Qafoku, N.P., C.C. Ainsworth, J.E. Szecsody, and O.S. Qafoku. 2003. Effect of coupled dissolution and redox reactions on Cr(VI)aq attenuation during transport in the Hanford sediments under hyperalkaline conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37:3640-3646.
32. Qafoku, N.P., E. Van Ranst, A. Noble, and G. Baert. 2004. Variable charge soils: Their mineralogy, chemistry and management. Adv. Agron. 84:159-215.
33. Rothmel, R.K., R.W. Peters, E.S.T. Martin, and M.F. Deflaun. 1998. Surfactant foam/bioaugmentation technology for in situ treatment of TCE-DNAPLs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:1667-1675.
34. Schramm, L.L., and R. Wassmuth. 1994. Foams: Basic principles. p. 3-46. In L.L. Schramm (ed.) Foams: Fundamentals and applications in the petro- leum industry. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.
35. Tanzil, D. 2001. Foam generation and propagation in heterogeneous porous media. Ph.D. diss. Rice Univ., Houston, TX.
36. USEPA. 1992. Hexavalent chromium by UV-visible spectrophotometry. Method 7196A. In Test methods for evaluating solid waste: Physical/chemical methods. EPA SW-846. USEPA, Washington, DC.
37. USEPA. 1996. Alkaline digestion for hexavalent chromium. Method 3060A. In Test methods for evaluating solid waste: Physical/chemical methods. EPA SW-846. USEPA, Washington, DC.
38. Wang, S., and C.N. Mulligan. 2004a. An evaluation of surfactant foam technology in remediation of contaminated soil. Chemosphere 57:1079-1089.
39. Wang, S., and C.N. Mulligan. 2004b. Rhamnolipid foam enhanced remediation of cadmium and nickel contaminated soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 157:315-330.
40. Wazne, M., S.C. Jagupilla, D.H. Moon, C. Christodoulatos, and M.G. Kim. 2007. Assessment of calcium polysulfide for the remediation of hexavalent chromium in chromite ore processing residue (COPR). J. Hazard. Mater. 143:620-628.
41. Zhong, L., S. Siddiqui, and M.R. Islam. 1998. A new method for screening sur- factants for foam diversion applications. Energy Sources 21:191-213.