Unreliable oscillometric blood pressure measurement: Prevalence, repeatability and characteristics of the phenomenon

Journal of Human Hypertension

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 794-800

  Stergiou, G S ^a   Lourida, P ^a   Tzamouranis, D ^a   Baibas, N M ^a  

^a SOTIRIA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT;

ADULT; ARM CIRCUMFERENCE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSCILLOMETRY; PREVALENCE; PULSE PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTPATIENTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 70749154760     PISSN: 09509240     EISSN: 14765527     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2009.20     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G et al. European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 821-848.
2. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN et al. Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and exBerimental animals: Part 1: blAod pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 2005; 45: 142-161.
3. Pickering TG, Miller NH, Ogedegbe G, Krakoff LR, Artinian NT, Goff D. American Heart Association; American Society of Hypertension; Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Call to action on use and reimbursement for home blood pressure monitoring: A joint scientific statement from the American Heart Association, American Society Of Hypertension, and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association. Hypertension 2008; 52: 10-29.
4. Parati G, Stergiou GS, Asmar R, Bilo G, de Leeuw P, Imai Y et al. ESH Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. European Society of Hypertension guidelines for blood pressure monitoring at home: A summary report of the Second International Consensus Conference on Home Blood Pressure Monitoring. J Hypertens 2008; 26: 1505-1526.
5. Pickering TG. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer? Blood Press Monit 2003; 8: 23-25.
6. Stergiou GS. Office blood pressure measurement with electronic devices: has the time come? Am J Hypertens 2008; 21: 246.
7. White WB, Berson AS, Robbins C, Jamieson MJ, Prisant LM, Roccella E et al. National standard for measurement of resting and ambulatory blood pressures with automated sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1993; 21: 504-509.
8. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, O'Malley K et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of automated and semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens 1990; 8 607-619.
9. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al., On behalf of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension. International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7: 3-17.
10. dabl® Educational Trust. Devices for blood pressure measurement. http://www.dableducational.org. Assessed 2 November 2008.
11. O'Brien E, Atkins N. Validation and reliability of blood pressure monitors. In: W White (ed). Blood Press Monit Cardiovasc Med Ther. Humana Press Inc.: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2007, pp 97-132.
12. Gerin W, Schwartz AR, Schwartz JE, Pickering TG, Davidson KW, Bress J et al. Limitations of current validation protocols for home blood pressure monitors for individual patients. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7: 313-318.
13. Wright JM, Mattu GS, Perry Jr TL, Gelferc ME, Strange KD, Zorn A et al. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6: 161-165.
14. Mattu GS, Perry Jr TL, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100 (Beta)) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6: 153-159.
15. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN et al. Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and exBerimental animals: Part 1: blAod pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 2005; 45: 142-161.
16. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005; 37: 360-363.
17. Stergiou GS, Alamara CV, Salgami EV, Vaindirlis IN, Dacou-Voutetakis C, Mountokalakis TD. Reproducibility of home and ambulatory blood pressure in children and adolescents. Blood Press Monit 2005; 10: 143-147.
18. Van Popele NM, Bos WJ, de Beer NA, van Der Kuip DA, Hofman A, Grobbee DE et al. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer. Hypertension 2000; 36: 484-488.
19. Ni H, Wu C, Prineas R, Shea S, Liu K, Kronmal R et al. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Am J Hypertens 2006; 19: 353-360.
20. Van Ittersum FJ, Wijering RM, Lambert J, Donker AJ, Stehouwer CD. Determinants of the limits of agreement between the sphygmomanometer and the SpaceLabs 90207 device for blood pressure measurement in healthy volunteers and insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J Hypertens 1998; 16: 1125-1130.
21. Thompson AM, Eguchi K, Reznik ME, Shah SS, Pickering TG. Validation of an oscillometric home blood pressure monitor in an end-stage renal disease population and the effect of arterial stiffness on its accuracy. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12: 227-232.
22. Stergiou GS, Yiannes NG, Rarra VC. Validation of the Omron 705 IT oscillometric device for home blood pressure measurement in children and adolescents: The Arsakion School Study. Blood Press Monit 2006; 11: 229-234.