A hybrid quality loss function-based multi-objective design optimization approach

Quality Engineering

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 277-289

  Bhamare, Sunil S ^a   Yadav, Om Prakash ^b   Rathore, Ajay ^a  

^a MALAVIYA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b North Dakota State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Goal programming; Multi objective optimization; Product design; Quality loss function

Indexed keywords

COMPETITIVE COSTS; COMPETITIVE MARKETS; CONTROL PARAMETERS; DESIGN CRITERION; DESIGN ENGINEERS; DEVIATION VARIABLES; EARLY DESIGN STAGES; EFFICIENT DESIGNS; GOAL PROGRAMMING; HIGH-QUALITY PRODUCTS; LEAF SPRINGS; MULTI-OBJECTIVE DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC; QUALITY LOSS; QUALITY LOSS FUNCTION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; COST REDUCTION; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 70749153122     PISSN: 08982112     EISSN: 15324222     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08982110902762626     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adali, S., Walker, M., Verijenko, V. E. (1996). Multi-objective optimization of laminated plates for maximum pre-buckling, buckling and post-buckling strength using continuous and discrete ply angles. Computer. Structures, 35:117-130.
2. Antony, J. (2000). Multi-response optimization in industrial experiments using Taguchi's quality loss function and principal component analysis. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 16:3-8.
3. Antony, J. (2001). Simultaneous optimisation of multiple quality characteristics in manufacturing processes using Taguchi's quality loss function. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 17(2):134-138.
4. Arora, J. S. (1989). Introduction to Optimum Design. New York: McGraw-Hill International.
5. Borri, A., Speranzini, E. (1993). Multicriteria optimization of laminated composite material structures. Meccanica, 28:233-238.
6. Box, M. J. (1965). A new method of constraint optimization and a comparison with other methods. Computer Journal, 8:42-52.
7. Chandra, M. J. (2001). Statistical Quality Control. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Ferfusan, R. (1955). Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming. Management Science, 1(2):138-151.
9. Chen, W., Wiecek, M., Zhang, J. (1999). Quality utility: A compromise programming approach to robust design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 121(2):179-187.
10. Cohon, J. L. (1978). Multi-Objective Programming and Planning. New York: Academic Press.
11. Cohon, J. L. (1985). Multi-criteria programming: Brief review and application. In: Gero, J. S., Ed. Design Optimization. NewYork: Academic Press.
12. Cohon, J. L., Marks, D. H. (1973). Multi-objective screening models and water resources investment. Water Resources Research, 9(4 ):826-836.
13. Das, I., Dennis, J. E. (1997). A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multi-criteria optimization problems. Structural Optimization, 14:63-69.
14. Erol, S., Gratton, M. (1999). Design, analysis and optimization of composite leaf springs for light vehicle applications. Computers and Structures, 44:195-204.
15. Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. R., Duckstein, L. (1982). Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Hauser, J., Clausing, D. (1988). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3):63-73.
17. Ignizio, J. P. (1982). Linear Programming in Single-Multiple Objective Systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
18. Keeney, R. L., Raifa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objective: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: Wiley & Sons.
19. Kim, J. Y., Cho, B. R. (2002). Development of priority-based robust design. Quality Engineering, 14(3):355-363.
20. Kunjur, A., Krishnamurty, S. (1997). A robust multi-criteria optimization approach. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 32(7 ):797-810.
21. Miura, H., Chargin, M. K. (1996). A Flexible Formulation for Multi-Objective Design Problems. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. AIAA Journal, pp. 1187-1192.
22. Papalambros, P. Y., Wilde, D. J. (1991). Principles of Optimal Design: Modelling and Computation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Phadke, M. S. (1989). Quality Engineering using Robust Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: P.T.R. Prentice-Hall.
24. Rajendran, I., Vijayarangan, S. (2001). Optimal design of a composite leaf spring using genetic algorithms. Computers and Structures, 79: 1121-1129.
25. Ramakrishnan, B., Rao, S. S. (1991). A robust optimization approach using Taguchi's loss function for solving nonlinear optimization problems. In: Advances in Design Automation, ASME DE-32-1, 241-248.
26. Romero, C. (1985). Multi-objective and goal programming approaches as a distance function model. Journal of the Operational Research Society 36(3):249-251.
27. Romero, C. (1986). A survey of generalised goal programming (1970-1982). European Journal of Operational Research, 25: 183-191.
28. Romero, C. (1991). Handbook of Critical Issues in Goal Programming Oxford: Pergamon Press.
29. Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30. Saravanos, D. A., Chamis, C. C. (1992). Multi-objective shape and material optimization of composite structures including damping. AIAA Journal, 30(3):805-813.
31. Schniederjans, M. J. (1995). Goal Programming: Methodology and Applications. Norwell, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Shigley, J. E., Mischke, C. R. (2001). Mechanical Engineering Design Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
33. Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multi Criteria Optimisation: Theory, Computation, and Application. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
34. Taguchi, G. (1987). System of Experimental Design. New York: Unipub/Kraus International.
35. Taguchi, G., Chowdhary, S., Wu, Y. (2004). Taguchi's Quality Engineering Handbook. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
36. Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E., Hsiang, T. (1989). Quality Engineering in Production Systems. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
37. Tamiz, M., Jones, D., Romero, C. (1998). Theory and methodology goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-ofthe- art. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(3):569-581.
38. Thurston, D. L., Carnahan, J. V., Liu, T. (1994). Optimization of design utility. Journal of Mechanical Design, 116:801-808.
39. Wahl, A. M. (1963). Mechanical Springs, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
40. Yu, P. L. (1973). A class of solutions for group decision problems. Management Science, 19(8):936-946.
41. Zang, C., Friswell, M. I., Mottershead, J. E. (2005). A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics. Computer and Structures, 83:315-326.
42. Zeleny, M. (1973). Compromise programming. In: Cochrane, J. L., Zeleney, M., Eds. Multi-Criteria Decision Making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, 262-301.