Magnetic field imaging with atomic Rb vapor

Optics Letters

Volumn 34, Issue 22, 2009, Pages 3529-3531

  Mikhailov, Eugeniy E ^a   Novikova, I ^a   Havey, M D ^b   Narducci, F A ^c  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOMS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; RUBIDIUM;

DYNAMIC IMAGING; ELECTROMAGNETICALLY-INDUCED TRANSPARENCY; EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATIONS; FIELD DETECTIONS; FIELD OF VIEWS; IMAGE PIXELS; MAGNETIC FIELD IMAGING; TRANSVERSE MAGNETIC FIELD;

MAGNETISM;

RUBIDIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETISM; VOLATILIZATION;

ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETICS; RUBIDIUM; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 70749151510     PISSN: 01469592     EISSN: 15394794     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/OL.34.003529     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. D. Budker and M. V. Romalis, Nat. Phys. 3, 227 (2007).
2. C. Affolderbach, M. Stähler, S. Knappe, and R. Wynands, Appl. Phys. B 75, 605 (2002).
3. I. K. Kominis, T. W. Kornack, J. C. Allred, and M. V. Romalis, Nature 422, 596 (2003).
4. S. Xu, S. M. Rochester, V. V. Yashchuk, M. H. Donaldson, and D. Budker, Rev. Sei. Instrum. 77, 083106 (2006).
5. M. Vengalattore, J. M. Higbie, S. R. Leslie, J. Guzman, L. E. Sadler, and D. M. Stamper-Kern, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 200801 (2007).
6. H. Xia, A. Ben-Amar Baranga, D. Hoffman, and M. V. Romalis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 211104 (2006).
7. G. Bison, N. Castagna, A. Hofer, P. Knowles, J.-L. Schenker, and A. Weis, arXiv:0906.4869.
8. M. Fleischhauer, A. Imamoglu, and J. P. Marangos, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 633 (2005).
9. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 133, 60 (1931).
10. D. Budker, V. Yashchuk, and M. Zolotorev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5788 (1998).
11. M. Erhard and H. Helm, Phys. Rev. A 63, 043813 (2001).
12. H. Asahi, K. Motomura, K. Harada, and M. Mitsunaga, Opt. Lett. 28, 1153 (2003).
13. For arbitrary orientation of the laser polarization with respect of the magnetic field vector the analysis of relative amplitudes of EIT resonances at 0, ±gmB and ±2gmB two-photon detunings may allow measurements of both magnitude and direction of a magnetic field.
14. S. A. Zibrov, I. Novikova, D. F. Phillips, R. L. Walsworth, A. S. Zibrov, V. L. Velichansky, A. V. Taichenachev, and V. I. Yudin, arXiv:0910.4703 (2009).
15. http://femm.foster-miller.net/wiki/HomePage.
16. W. Happer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 169 (1972).
17. S. Knappe, L. Hollberg, and J. Kitching, Opt. Lett. 29, 388 (2004).
18. A. G. Marshall and F. R. Verdun, Fourier Transforms in NMR, Optical, and Mass Spectrometry (Elsevier, 1990).
19. J. Vanier, Appl. Phys. B 81, 421 (2005).
20. V. Shah, S. Knappe, P. D. D. Schwindt, and J. Kitching, Nat. Photonics 1, 649 (2007).