Optimization of selection contribution and mate allocations in monoecious tree breeding populations

BMC Genetics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages 70-

  Hallander, Jon ^a   Waldmann, Patrik ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GENETIC GAIN; GENETIC TRAIT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HERITABILITY; MATING SYSTEM; MATING TYPE; MINIMIZATION OF PAIR WISE COANCESTRY BETWEEN MATE; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; POSITIVE ASSORTATIVE MATING;

EID: 70749142256     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-70     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Meuwissen THE. Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J Anim Sci 1997, 75:934-940.
2. Grundy B, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genet Res 1998, 72:159-168.
3. Fernandez J, Toro MA. The use of mathematical programming to control inbreeding in selection schemes. J Anim Breed Genet 1999, 116:447-466.
4. Villanueva B, Avendaño S, Woolliams JA. Prediction of genetic gain from quadratic optimisation with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genet Sel Evol 2006, 38:127-146. 2689302, 16492371, 10.1186/1297-9686-38-2-127.
5. Colleau JJ, Moureaux S, Briend M, Bechu J. A method for the dynamic management of genetic variability in dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2004, 36:373-394. 2697209, 15231230, 10.1186/1297-9686-36-4-373.
6. Kearney JF, Wall E, Villanueva B, Coffey MP. Inbreeding trends and application of optimized selection in the UK Holstein population. J Dairy Sci 2004, 87:3503-3509.
7. Koenig S, Simianer H. Approaches to the management of inbreeding and relationship in the German Holstein dairy cattle population. Livest Sci 2006, 103:40-53.
8. Kerr RJ, Goddard ME, Jarvis SF. Maximising genetic response in tree breeding with constraints on group coancestry. Silv Genet 1998, 47:165-173.
9. Fernandez J, Toro MA. Controlling genetic variability by mathematical programming in a selection scheme on an open-pollinated population in Eucalyptus globulus. Theor Appl Genet 2001, 102:1056-1064.
10. Hallander J, Waldmann P. Optimum contribution selection in large general tree breeding populations with an application to Scots pine. Theor Appl Genet 2009, 118:1133-1142. 10.1007/s00122-009-0968-7, 19183858.
11. Toro MA, Nieto B, Salgado C. A note on minimization of inbreeding in small-scale selection programs. Livest Prod Sci 1988, 20:317-323.
12. Caballero A, Santiago E, Toro MA. Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Anim Sci 1996, 42:431-442.
13. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genet Sel Evol 2000, 32:231-248. 2706885, 14736390, 10.1186/1297-9686-32-3-231.
14. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE. Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations. Genet Sel Evol 2002, 34:23-39. 2705421, 11929623, 10.1186/1297-9686-34-1-23.
15. Fernandez J, Toro MA, Caballero A. Fixed contributions designs vs. minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations. Genetics 2003, 165:885-894. 1462774, 14573495.
16. Rosvall O, Mullin TJ. Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding. Theor Appl Genet 2003, 107:629-642. 10.1007/s00122-003-1318-9, 12851766.
17. King JN, Johnson GR. Monte Carlo simulation models of breeding-population advancement. Silv Genet 1993, 42:68-78.
18. Lstiburek M, Mullin TJ, Lindgren D, Rosvall O. Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared with population-wide positive assortative mating. Theor Appl Genet 2004, 109:1169-1177. 10.1007/s00122-004-1737-2, 15290046.
19. Lstiburek M, Mullin TJ, Mackay TFC, Huber D, Li B. Positive assortative mating with family size as a function of predicted parental breeding values. Genetics 2005, 171:1311-1320. 1456834, 15965252, 10.1534/genetics.105.041723.
20. Lande R. Influence of mating system on maintenance of genetic variability in polygenic characters. Genetics 1977, 86:485-498. 1213688, 407132.
21. Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE. Minimization of rate of inbreeding for small populations with overlapping generations. Genet Res 2001, 77:285-292. 10.1017/S0016672301005079, 11486511.
22. Avendaño S, Woolliams JA, Villanueva B. Mendelian sampling terms as a selective advantage in optimum breeding schemes with restriction on the rate of inbreeding. Genet Res 2004, 83:55-64. 10.1017/S0016672303006566, 15125067.
23. Avendaño S, Woolliams JA, Villanueva B. Prediction of accuracy of estimated Mendelian sampling terms. J Anim Breed Genet 2005, 122:302-308. 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2005.00532.x, 16191038.
24. Woolliams JA. Genetic contribution and inbreeding. Utilisation and Conservation of Farm Animal Genetic Resources 2007, 147-165. AE Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishing, Oldenbroek K.
25. Bulmer MG. Effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat 1971, 105:201-210.
26. Caballero A, Toro MA. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet Res 2000, 75:331-343. 10.1017/S0016672399004449, 10893869.
27. Woolliams JA, Bijma P, Villanueva B. Expected genetic contributions and their impact on gene flow and genetic gain. Genetics 1999, 153:1009-1020. 1460791, 10511574.
28. Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220:671-680. 10.1126/science.220.4598.671, 17813860.
29. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A, Rosenbluth M, Teller A, Teller E. Equations of state calculations by fast computing methods. J Chem Phys 1953, 21:1087-1092.
30. Sanchez L, Yanchuk AA, King JN. Gametic models for multitrait selection schemes to study variance of response and drift under adverse genetic correlations. Tree Genet Genom 2008, 4:201-212.
31. Woolliams JA, Thompson R. A theory of genetic contributions. Proceedings, 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 7-12 August 1994; University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Selection and quantitative genetics; growth; reproduction; lactation; fish; fiber; meat 1994, 19.
32. Sorensen AC, Berg P, Woolliams JA. The advantage of factorial mating under selection is uncovered by deterministically predicted rates of inbreeding. Genet Sel Evol 2005, 37:57-81. 2697247, 15588568, 10.1186/1297-9686-37-1-57.
33. Wei RP, Yeh FC, Dhir NK. Investigation of status number following selection from populations under different mating designs. Silv Genet 2002, 51:87-92.
34. Wray NR, Thompson R. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genet Res 1990, 55:41-54. 10.1017/S0016672300025180, 2318415.
35. Falconer DS, MacKay TFC. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, New York: Longman.
36. Hinrichs D, Wetten M, Meuwissen THE. An algorithm to compute optimal genetic contributions in selection programs with large numbers of candidates. J Anim Sci 2006, 84:3212-3218. 10.2527/jas.2006-145, 17093213.
37. Henderson CR. Applications of linear models in animal breeding 1984, Guelph: University of Guelph.
38. Borralho NMG. The impact of individual tree mixed models (BLUP) in tree breeding. Proceedings CRCTHF-IUFRO Conference of Eucalypt Plantation: Improving Fibre Yield and Quality: 19-24 February 1995; Hobart, Tasmania 1995, 141-145. CRC for Temperate Hardwood Forestry, Potts BM, Borralho NMG, Reid JB, Cromer RN, Tibbits WN, CA Raymond.
39. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R. ASReml User Guide Release 2.0 2006, Hemel Hempstead: VSN International Ltd.
40. Wright S. Evolution and genetics of populations, The theory of gene frequencies 1969, 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.