DNA polymorphisms reveal geographic races of reed canarygrass

Crop Science

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 2139-2148

  Casler, M D ^a   Phillips, M M ^b   Krohn, A L ^a  

^a U S DAIRY FORAGE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHALARIS; PHALARIS ARUNDINACEA;

EID: 70749127166     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2009.02.0055     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alderson, J., and W.C. Sharp. 1994. Grass varieties in the United States. USDA-SCS Agric. Handb. 170. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
2. Always, F.J. 1931. Early trials and use of reed canary grass as a forage plant. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 23:64-66.
3. Anderson, D.E. 1961. Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Phalaris. Iowa State J. Sci. 36:1-96.
4. Coulman, B.E., D.L. Woods, and K.W. Clark. 1976. Identification of low alkaloid genotypes of reed canarygrass cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 56:837-845.
5. Excoffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online 1:47-50.
6. Fjellheim, S., and O. Rognli. 2005. Genetic diversity within and among Nordic meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) cultivars determined on the basis of AFLP markers. Crop Sci. 45:2081-2086.
7. Gifford, A.L.S., J.B. Ferdy, and J. Molofsky. 2002. Genetic composition and morphological variation among populations of the invasive grass, Phalaris arundinacea. Can. J. Bot. 80:779-785.
8. Gower, J.C. 1972. Measures of taxonomic distance and their analysis. p. 1-24. In J.S. Weiner and J. Huizinga (ed.) The assessment of population affinities in man. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
9. Green, E.K., and S.M. Galatowitsch. 2001. Differences in wetland plant community establishment with additions of nitrate-N and invasive species (Phalaris arundinacea and Typha × glauca). Can. J. Bot. 79:170-178.
10. Green, E.K., and S.M. Galatowitsch. 2002. Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 39:134-144.
11. Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41:95-98.
12. Hamilton, M.B. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation. Mol. Ecol. 8:521-523.
13. Knapp, E.E., and K.J. Rice. 1996. Genetic structure and gene flow in Elymus glaucus (blue wildrye): Implications for native grassland restoration. Restor. Ecol. 4:1-10.
14. Lavergne, S., and J. Molofsky. 2004. Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a biological model in the study of plant invasions. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 23:415-429.
15. Lavergne, S., and J. Molofsky. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:3883-3888.
16. Lindig-Cisneros, R., and J.B. Zedler. 2002. Relationships between canopy complexity and germination microsites for Phalaris arundinacea L. Oecologia 133:159-167.
17. Marten, G.C. 1989. Breeding forage grasses to maximize animal performance. p. 71-104. In D.A. Sleper et al. (ed.) Contributions from breeding forage and turf grasses. CSSA Spec. Publ. 15. CSSA, Madison, WI.
18. Maurer, D.A., R. Lindig-Cisneros, K.J. Werner, S. Kercher, R. Miller, and J.B. Zedler. 2003. The replacement of wetland vegetation by reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea). Ecol. Restoration 21:116-119.
19. Maurer, D.A., and J.B. Zedler. 2002. Differential invasion of a wetland grass explained by tests of nutrients and light availability on establishment and clonal growth. Oecologia 131:279-288.
20. Merigliano, M.E., and P. Lesica. 1998. The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the inland northwest, USA. Nat. Areas J. 18:223-230.
21. Mian, M.A.R., J.C. Zwonitzer, Y. Chen, M.C. Saha, and A.A. Hopkins. 2005. AFLP diversity within and among hardinggrass populations. Crop Sci. 45:2591-2597.
22. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
23. Peakall, R., and P.E. Smouse. 2006. Genalex 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6:288-295.
24. Perry, L.G., S.M. Galatowitsch, and C.J. Rosen. 2004. Competitive control of invasive vegetation: A native wetland sedge suppresses Phalaris arundinacea in carbon-enriched soil. J. Appl. Ecol. 41:151-162.
25. Platt, A.R., R.W. Woodhall, and A.L. George, Jr. 2007. Improved DNA sequencing quality and efficiency using an optimized fast cycle sequencing protocol. Biotechniques 43:58-62.
26. Saltonstall, K. 2001. A set of primers for amplification of noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA in the grasses. Mol. Ecol. Notes 1:76-78.
27. Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion of a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:2445-2449.
28. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide, Version 7-1, 3415. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.
29. Saski, C., S.B. Lee, S. Fjellheim, C. Guda, R.K. Jansen, H. Luo, J. Tomkins, O.A. Rognli, H. Daniell, and J.L. Clarke. 2007. Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Hordeum vulgare, Sorghum bicolor, and Agrostis stolonifera, and comparative analyses with other grass genomes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 115:571-590.
30. Schneider, S., J.M. Kueffer, D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 1997. Arlequin ver. 1.1: A software for population genetic data analysis. Available at http://lgb.unige.ch/arlequin/(verified 21 Aug. 2009). Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Univ. of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
31. Schoth, H.A. 1929. Reed canary grass. Farmers Bull. 1602. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DC.
32. Shaw, J., E.B. Lickey, J.T. Beck, S.B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K.C. Siripun, C.T. Winder, E.E. Schilling, and R.L. Small. 2005. The tortoise and the hare: II. Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am. J. Bot. 92:142-166.
33. Shaw, J., E.B. Lickey, E.E. Schilling, and R. Small. 2007. Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: The tortoise and the hare: III. Am. J. Bot. 94:275-288.
34. Sheaffer, C.C., and G.C. Marten. 1995. Reed canarygrass. p. 335-343. In R.F Barnes, D.A. Miller and C.J. Nelson (ed.) Forages. Vol. 1. An introduction to grassland agriculture. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames.
35. Small, R.L., J.A. Ryburn, R.C. Cronn, T. Seelman, and J.F. Wendel. 1998. The tortoise and the hare: Choosing between noncoding plastome and nuclear Adh sequences for phylogenetic reconstruction in a recently diverged plant group. Am. J. Bot. 85:1301-1315.
36. Spuher, D.R. 1994. Low plant diversity found in communities dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). p. 43-47. In D.C. Hartnett (ed.) Proc. of the 14th North American Prairie Conf.: Prairie Biodiversity. 12-16 July 1994. Kansas State Univ., Manhattan.
37. Storchova, H., R. Hrdlickova, J. Chrtek, Jr., M. Tetera, D. Fitze, and J. Fehrer. 2000. An improved method of DNA isolation from plants collected in the field and conserved in NaCl/CTAB solution. Taxonomy 49:79-84.
38. Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, and J. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 17:1105-1109.
39. Thompson, J.D., D.G. Higgins, and T.J. Gibson. 1994. Clustal W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
40. Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans, T. van de Lee, M. Hornes, A. Frijters, J. Pot, J. Peleman, M. Kuiper, and M. Zabeau. 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:4407-4414.
41. Wilkins, P.S., and H.D. Hughes. 1932. Agronomic trials with reed canary grass. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 24:18-28.
42. Xu, W.W., D.A. Sleper, and G.F. Krause. 1994. Genetic diversity of tall fescue germplasm based on RFLPs. Crop Sci. 34:246-252.