Does democratic anchorage matter?: An inquiry into the relation between democratic anchorage and outcome of dutch environmental projects

American Review of Public Administration

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 46-63

  Edelenbos, Jurian ^a   Steijn, Bram ^a   Klijn, Erik Hans ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Democratic anchorage; Governance; Outcome; Political involvement; Stakeholder involvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 70749111588     PISSN: 02750740     EISSN: 15523357     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0275074009332064     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Berry, J.M., Portney, K.E., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
3. Brinkerhoff, D.W., & Goldsmith, A.A. (2005). Institutional dualism and international development: A revisionist interpretation of good governance. Administration and Society, 37(2), 199-224.
4. Cobb, R.W., & Elder, C.D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. De Bruijn, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E.F., & in't Veld, R.J. (1998). Procesmanagement: Over Procesontwerp en Besluitvorming [Process management]. Schoonhoven, Netherlands: Academic Service.
6. De Jong, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). An insider's look into policy transfer in trans-national expert networks. European Planning Studies, 15(5), 687-706.
7. Dryzek, J.S. (2007). Networks and democratic ideals: Equality, freedom, and communication. In E. Sørenson & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 262-273). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
8. Edelenbos, J. (2005). Institutional implications of interactive governance: Insights from Dutch practice. Governance, 18(1), 111-134.
9. Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.H. (2006). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 417-446.
10. Edelenbos, J., & Monnikhof, R. (2001). Lokale Interactieve Beleidsvorming [Interactive decision making]. Utrecht, Netherlands: Lemma.
11. Edelenbos, J., Domingo, A., Klok, P., & van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Burger Als Beleidsadviseurs [Citizens as policy advisors]. Amsterdam: Instituut voor Publiek en Politiek.
12. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13. Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Healy, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
15. Innes, J.E., & Booher, D.E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In M. A. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 33-59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Jessop, B. (1998). The rise of governance and the risk of failure. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
17. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: Sage.
18. Klijn, E. (2008). Governance and governance networks in Europe: An assessment of 10 years of research on the theme. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505-525.
19. Klijn, E., & Koppenjan, J. (2000). Politicians and interactive decision-making: Institutional spoilsport or play-makers? Public Administration, 78(2), 365-387.
20. Kooiman, J. (Ed.). (1993). Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.
21. Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. London: Routledge.
22. Lowndes, V., Pratchet, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 1 local government perspectives. Public Administration, 76(2), 205-222.
23. Mantel, S.J. (2005). Core Concepts of Project Management (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
24. McLaverty, P. (Ed.). (2002). Public participation and innovations in community governance. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
25. Meier, K.J., & O'Toole, L.J. (2001). Managerial strategies and behaviour in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 11(3), 271-293.
26. Milward, H.B., & Provan, K.G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-379.
27. Nooteboom, B. (2002). Trust: Forms, foundations, functions, failures and figures. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
28. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, N., & Lee, J.-Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
29. Skelcher, C. (2007). Does democracy matter? A transatlantic research design on democratic performance and special purpose governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 61-76.
30. Sørenson, E. (2002). Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24(4), 693-720.
31. Sørenson, E. (2006). Metagovernance: The changing role of politicians in processes of democratic governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 98-114.
32. Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2003). Network politics, political capital and democracy. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(6), 609-634.
33. Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of network governance. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195-218.
34. Sørenson, E., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
35. Süsskind, L., & Cruikshank, J. (1987). Breaking the impasse. Consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. London: Basic Books.
36. Teisman, G.R. (2001). Ruimte Mobiliseren Voor Cooperatief Besturen [Creating space for cooperative government]. Rotterdam, Netherlands Erasmus University Rotterdam.
37. Van Eeten, M. (1999). Dialogues of the deaf. Defining new agendas for environmental deadlocks. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon.
38. Young, I.M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Young, I.M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670-690.