Utility impact rating with subsurface utility engineering in project development

Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering

Volumn 36, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 1744-1754

  Jung, Yeun J ^a  

^a The Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support tool; Subsurface utility engineering; Utility impact rating

Indexed keywords

BENEFIT COST RATIOS; CONSTRUCTION DELAYS; CONSTRUCTION SITES; DATA MANAGEMENT; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; DESIGN CHANGE; ENGINEERING PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS; HIGHWAY PROJECTS; LOCAL BUSINESS; PLANNING PHASE; PROJECT DEVELOPMENT; PROPERTY DAMAGE; SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERING; SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEERINGS; TRAFFIC DELAYS; UNDERGROUND UTILITIES;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HIGHWAY PLANNING; LOCATION;

ENGINEERING;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA MANAGEMENT; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION;

EID: 70749089178     PISSN: 03151468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/L09-102     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Society of Civil Engineering (ASCE). 2002. Standard guideline for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data. ASCE Code and Standards Activity Committee (CSAC), New York.
2. Anspach, J.H. 1994. Integrating subsurface utility engineering into damage prevention programs. The 1994 Excavation Damage Prevention Workshop. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, D.C., September 1994
3. Brown, D.B., and Mckim, P.G. 2002. How SUE technology can help manage risks associated with underground utilities, reduce damage to existing facilities, and save money. Cary, NC.
4. Doctor, R.H., Dunker, N.A., and Santee, N.M. 1995. Third-party damage prevention systems. Final Report for Gas Research Institute, No. 5094-810-2870, October 1995, Naperville, IL.
5. Heinrich, J. 1996. Assessment of the cost of underground utility damages. North California State University Tech., August 1996.
6. Jeong, H.S., Abraham, D.M., and Lew, J.J. 2004. Evaluation of an emerging market in subsurface utility engineering. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130(2): 225. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:2(225).
7. Lew, J.J. 1996. Subsurface utility engineering - an initial step in project development. proc. associated schools of construction, Texas A&M University.
8. Lew, J.J. 2000. Cost savings on highway projects utilizing subsurface utility engineering. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.
9. Nelson, R., and Daly, M. 1998. Creating a major emphasis on damage prevention. Session Handout, Session F5, Damage Prevention Convention, Atlanta, GA, December 1998.
10. Osman, H., and El-Diraby, T.E. 2007. Implementation of subsurface utility engineering in Ontario: cases and a cost model. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 34(12): 1529-1541. doi:10. 1139/L07-066.
11. Reid, J. 1999. Are contractors, engineers and architects ready for a crisis? American Institute of Constructors (AIC), July/August, 1999.
12. Sterling, R.L. 2000. Utility locating technologies: a summary of responses to a statement of need distributed by the federal laboratory consortium for technology transfer. Federal Laboratory Consortium Special Report Series No. 9, Washington, D.C.
13. Stevens, R.E. 1993. Adding value through the innovations of subsurface utility engineering. The Society of American Value Engineering (SAVE) Annual Proceedings. The Society of American Value Engineers (SAVE), Fort Lauderdale, Florida, June 1993.
14. Stevens, R.E., and Anspach, J.H. 1993. New technology overcomes the problems of underground system interferences on power projects. American Power Conference, 55: 323-326.