메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 494-507

An exploratory investigation of the factor structure of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS)

Author keywords

Exploratory factor analysis; Factor extraction decision making; Intelligence testing; RIAS; Schmid Leiman

Indexed keywords


EID: 70649102967     PISSN: 07342829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0734282909333179     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (50)

References (28)
  • 2
    • 0000697225 scopus 로고
    • A further note on the multiplying factors for various X2 approximations in factor analysis
    • Bartlett, M.S. (1954). A further note on the multiplying factors for various X2 approximations in factor analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296-298.
    • (1954) Journal of the Royal Statistical Society , vol.16 , pp. 296-298
    • Bartlett, M.S.1
  • 3
    • 34249867761 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales and the Reynolds Intellectual Screening Test
    • In R. A. Spies & B. S. Plake (Eds.), Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements
    • Bracken, B.A. (2005). Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales and the Reynolds Intellectual Screening Test. In R. A. Spies & B. S. Plake (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 892-894). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
    • (2005) The Sixteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook , pp. 892-894
    • Bracken, B.A.1
  • 6
    • 21844485644 scopus 로고
    • On methodology in the study of cognitive abilities
    • Carroll, J.B. (1995). On methodology in the study of cognitive abilities. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 429-452.
    • (1995) Multivariate Behavioral Research , vol.30 , pp. 429-452
    • Carroll, J.B.1
  • 7
    • 84880609979 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis
    • Costello, A.B., & Osborne, J.W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9.
    • (2005) Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation , vol.10 , pp. 1-9
    • Costello, A.B.1    Osborne, J.W.2
  • 8
    • 33646526949 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Investigating the theoretical structure of the Stanford-Binet
    • Fifth Edition
    • DiStefano, C., & Dombrowski, S.C. (2006). Investigating the theoretical structure of the Stanford-Binet, Fifth Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24, 123-136.
    • (2006) Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , vol.24 , pp. 123-136
    • DiStefano, C.1    Dombrowski, S.C.2
  • 10
    • 2342578664 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Test review: Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales
    • Elliot, R.W. (2004). Test review: Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 325-328.
    • (2004) Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology , vol.19 , pp. 325-328
    • Elliot, R.W.1
  • 11
  • 12
    • 33846858866 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring?
    • Frazier, T.W., & Youngstrom, E.A. (2007). Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring? Intelligence, 35, 169-182.
    • (2007) Intelligence , vol.35 , pp. 169-182
    • Frazier, T.W.1    Youngstrom, E.A.2
  • 13
    • 0004125042 scopus 로고
    • Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    • Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    • (1983) Factor Analysis
    • Gorsuch, R.L.1
  • 14
    • 8644267207 scopus 로고
    • A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis
    • Horn, J. (1966). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185.
    • (1966) Psychometrika , vol.30 , pp. 179-185
    • Horn, J.1
  • 15
    • 0013963736 scopus 로고
    • Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences
    • Horn, J.L., & Cattell, R.B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized general intelligences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 57, 253-270.
    • (1966) Journal of Educational Psychology , vol.57 , pp. 253-270
    • Horn, J.L.1    Cattell, R.B.2
  • 16
    • 34250421484 scopus 로고
    • An index of factorial simplicity
    • Kaiser, H.F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
    • (1974) Psychometrika , vol.39 , pp. 31-36
    • Kaiser, H.F.1
  • 18
    • 0034242321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test
    • O'Connor, B.P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer's MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396-402.
    • (2000) Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers , vol.32 , pp. 396-402
    • O'Connor, B.P.1
  • 20
    • 0002741322 scopus 로고
    • The development of hierarchical factor solutions
    • Schmid, J., & Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53-61.
    • (1957) Psychometrika , vol.22 , pp. 53-61
    • Schmid, J.1    Leiman, J.M.2
  • 23
    • 0001193215 scopus 로고
    • Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations
    • Velicer, W.F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 41, 321-327.
    • (1976) Psychometrika , vol.41 , pp. 321-327
    • Velicer, W.F.1
  • 24
    • 0002366447 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components
    • In R. D. Goffin & E. Helms (Eds.), Norwell, MA: Springer
    • Velicer, W.F., Eaton, C.A., & Fava, J.L. (2000). Construct explication through factor or component analysis: A review and evaluation of alternative procedures for determining the number of factors or components. In R. D. Goffin & E. Helms (Eds.), Problems and solutions in human assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at seventy (pp. 41-71). Norwell, MA: Springer.
    • (2000) Problems and Solutions in Human Assessment: Honoring Douglas N. Jackson at Seventy , pp. 41-71
    • Velicer, W.F.1    Eaton, C.A.2    Fava, J.L.3
  • 25
    • 45749136205 scopus 로고
    • Component analysis versus common factor analysis-Some further observations
    • Velicer, W.F., & Jackson, D.N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis-Some further observations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 97-114.
    • (1990) Multivariate Behavioral Research , vol.25 , pp. 97-114
    • Velicer, W.F.1    Jackson, D.N.2
  • 28
    • 58149371334 scopus 로고
    • Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain
    • Zwick, W.R., & Velicer, W.F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442.
    • (1986) Psychological Bulletin , vol.99 , pp. 432-442
    • Zwick, W.R.1    Velicer, W.F.2


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.