The combination of single cell micromanipulation with LV-PCR system and its application in forensic science

Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 516-517

  Li, Caixia ^a   Qi, Bing ^b   Ji, Anquan ^a   Xu, Xiulan ^a   Hu, Lan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF FORENSIC SCIENCE   (China)

^b PEOPLE S PUBLIC SECURITY UNIVERSITY OF CHINA   (China)

Author keywords

Buccal cell; LV PCR; Micromanipulation; Mixture sample

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ARTICLE; CELL ASSAY; CELL SELECTION; CHEEK; CHEWING GUM; DNA DETERMINATION; EXPERIMENT; FORENSIC SCIENCE; GENE LOCUS; GENOTYPE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MICROMANIPULATION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAMPLE; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT; SOCIAL WORKER;

EID: 70649097290     PISSN: 18751768     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2009.08.016     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Findlay A.T., Quirke P., Frazier R., and Urquhart A. DNA fingerprinting from single cells. Nature 389 (1997) 555-556
2. Elliott K., Hill D.S., Lambert C., Burroughes T.R., and Gill P. Use of laser microdissection greatly improves the recovery of DNA from sperm on microscope slides. Forensic Sci. Int. 137 (2003) 28-36
3. Hu L., Ji An.Q., Li C.X., Su Q., and Li X. Micromanipulation separation of cells for short tandem repeats analysis. 18th IAFS 246 (2008) 85 (Abstract)
4. Li X., Hu L., Guo H.L., Liu Zh.F., Tu Zh., and Mi R.H. The exploring of a method for isolating sperm cells from mixture sample. Chin. J. Forensic Med. 5 (2006) 263-265
5. Qi B., Li W.Sh., Liu B., Zhang L.J., Liu H.D., Yi J.L., LI C.X., and Hu L. A discussion of laser capture microdissection in forensic application. Evidence Sci. 16 (2008) 764-768
6. Proff C., Rothschild M.A., and Schneider P.M. Low volume PCR (LV-PCR) for STR typing of forensic casework samples. In: Amorium A., Corte-real F., and Morling N. (Eds). Progress in Forensic Genetics (2006), Elsevier, Amsterdam 645-647
7. Gill P., Whitaker J., Flaxman C., Brown N., and Buckleton J. An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci. Int. 112 (2000) 17-40