Exploiting term co-occurrence for enhancing automated image annotation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5706 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 632-639

  Llorente, Ainhoa ^a,b   Overell, Simon ^c   Liu, Haiming ^a   Hu, Rui ^a   Rae, Adam ^a   Zhu, Jianhan ^d   Song, Dawei ^e   Rüger, Stefan ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b TECNALIA RESEARCH AND INNOVATION   (Spain)

^c IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^e ROBERT GORDON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automated image annotation; Image analysis; Semantic similarity; Statistical co occurrence

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL KNOWLEDGE; AUTOMATED IMAGE ANNOTATION; CO-OCCURRENCE; DATA SETS; IMAGE ANNOTATION; IMAGECLEF; PROBABILISTIC IMAGES; SEMANTIC SIMILARITY; TERM CO-OCCURRENCE; VISUAL CONCEPT;

AUTOMATION; CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; LINGUISTICS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEMANTICS;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

EID: 70549108171     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04447-2_79     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Yavlinsky, A., Schofield, E., Rüger, S.: Automated image annotation using global features and robust nonparametric density estimation. In: Proceedings of the International ACM Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, pp. 507-517 (2005)
2. Hanbury, A., Serra, J.: Mathematical morphology in the CIELAB space. Image Analysis & Stereology 21, 201-206 (2002)
3. Tamura, H., Mori, T., Yamawaki, T.: Textural features corresponding to visual perception. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 8(6), 460-473 (1978)
4. Deselaers, T., Hanbury, A.: The visual concept detection task in ImageCLEF 2008. In: Peters, C., et al. (eds.) CLEF 2008. LNCS, vol. 5706, pp. 531-538. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
5. Pedersen, Banerjee, Patwardhan: Maximizing semantic relatedness to perform word sense disambiguation. Technical report, University of Minnesota (2003)
6. Gracia, J., Mena, E.: Web-based measure of semantic relatedness. In: Bailey, J., Maier, D., Schewe, K.-D., Thalheim, B., Wang, X.S. (eds.) WISE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5175, pp. 136-150. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
7. Miller, G.A., Charles, W.G.: Contextual correlates of semantic similarity. Journal of Language and Cognitive Processes 6, 1-28 (1991)
8. Manning, C.D., Schütze, H.: Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
9. Llorente, A., Rüger, S.: Can a probabilistic image annotation system be improved using a co-occurrence approach? In: Workshop on Cross-Media Information Analysis, Extraction and Management at the 3rd International Conference on Semantic and Digital Media Technologies (2008)
10. Tollari, S., Detyniecki, M., Fakeri-Tabrizi, A., Amini, M.R., Gallinari, P.: UPMC/LIP6 at ImageCLEFphoto 2008: On the exploitation of visual concepts (VCDT). In: Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access - 9th Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (2008)