Implementing hydrologic boundary conditions in a multiphysics model

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volumn 14, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1374-1377

  Chui, Ting Fong May ^a,b   Freyberg, David L ^b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Boundaries; Evapotranspiration; Hydrology; Infiltration; Numerical models; Subsurface environment

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARIES; GENERIC BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; HYDROLOGIC BOUNDARIES; HYDROLOGIC MODELING; HYDROLOGIC MODELS; HYDROLOGIC PROCESS; MULTI-PHYSICS; MULTI-PHYSICS MODELING; MULTIPHYSICS MODEL; NUMERICAL MODELS; RAINFALL INFILTRATION; SUBSURFACE ENVIRONMENT;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYDRAULIC MODELS; HYDROLOGY; NUMERICAL METHODS; SEEPAGE; SOIL MECHANICS; WATER SUPPLY;

SIMULATORS;

BOUNDARY CONDITION; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INFILTRATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; RAINFALL; SEEPAGE;

EID: 70549099721     PISSN: 10840699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000113     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Balážová, A., Baroková, D., Mikula, K., Pfender, D., and Šoltész, A. (2002). "Numerical modelling of the groundwater flow in the left floodplain area of the Danube River." Proc., Algoritmy 2002 16th Conf. on Scientific Computing, 234-244.
2. Burbey, T. J. (2008). "The influence of geologic structures on deformation due to ground water withdrawal." Ground Water GRWAAP0017-467X, 46(2), 202-211. 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00395.x
3. Cardiff, M., and Kitanidis, P. K. (2008). "Efficient solution of nonlinear, underdetermined inverse problems with a generalized PDE model." Comput. Geosci. CGEODT0098-3004, 34(11), 1480-1491. 10.1016/ j.cageo.2008.01.013
4. Chui, T. M., and Freyberg, D. L. (2007). "The use of COMSOL for integrated hydrological modeling." Proc., COMSOL Conf. 2007 Boston, COMSOL AB, Newton, Mass., 217-223.
5. Clement, T. P., Wise, W. R., Molz, F. J., and Wen, M. (1996). "A comparison of modeling approaches for steady-state unconfined flow." J. Hydrol. JHYDA70022-1694, 181(1-4), 189-209. 10.1016/ 0022-1694(95)02904-4
6. COMSOL multiphysics earth science module user's guide, version 3.2. (2005a). COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
7. COMSOL multiphysics modeling guide, version 3.2. (2005b). COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden.
8. Forsyth, P. A. (1988). "Comparison of the single-phase and two-phase numerical model formulation for saturated-unsaturated groundwater flow." Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. CMMECC0045-7825, 69(2), 243-259. 10.1016/0045-7825(88)90190-9
9. Mein, R. G., and Larson, C. L. (1973). "Modeling infiltration during a steady rain." Water Resour. Res. WRERAQ0043-1397, 9(2), 384-394. 10.1029/WR009i002p00384
10. Panday, S., and Huyakorn, P. S. (2004). "A fully coupled physically-based spatially-distributed model for evaluating surface/ subsurface flow." Adv. Water Resour. AWREDI0309-1708, 27, 361-382. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.02.016
11. Wise, W. R., Clement, T. P., and Molz, F. J. (1994). "Variably saturated modeling of transient drainage: Sensitivity to soil properties." J. Hydrol. JHYDA70022-1694, 161(1-4), 91-108. 10.1016/ 0022-1694(94)90122-8