'Araphid' diatom classification and the 'absolute standard'

Acta Botanica Croatica

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 455-463

  Williams, David M ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Araphid; Classification; Diatom; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

BACILLARIOPHYTA; LICMOPHORA;

EID: 70549092084     PISSN: 03650588     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. AGARDH, C. A. 1823-1828: Systema Algarum. Litteris Berlingianis, Lundae.
2. ANDERSON, E. 1940: The concept of the genus: II. A survey of modern opinion. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 67, 363-369.
3. BARTLETT, H. H. 1940: The concept of the genus: I. History of the generic concept in botany. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 67, 349-362.
4. CLAYTON, W. D. 1972: Some aspects of the genus concept. Kew Bulletin 27, 281-287.
5. CLAYTON, W. D. 1983: The genus concept in practice. Kew Bulletin 38, 149-153.
6. GREENMAN, J. M. 1940: The concept of the genus: III. Genera from the standpoint of morphology. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 67, 371-374.
7. GOLOBOFF, P. 1999: Nona (NO NAME) ver. 2. Published by the author, Tucumán, Argentina.
8. HUSTEDT, F. 1930. Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In: PASCHER, A. (ed), Die Susswasserflora Mitteleuropas, 10 Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Germany.
9. KOCIOLEK, J. P. 1997: Historical constraints, species concepts and the search for a natural classification of diatoms. Diatom 13, 3-8.
10. KOCIOLEK, J. P. 1998: Does each genus of diatoms have at least one unique feature? - A reply to Round. Diatom Research 13, 177-179.
11. LANGE-BERTALOT, H. 1997: As a practical diatomist, how does one deal with the flood of new names? Diatom 13, 9-12.
12. LARKIN, M. A., BLACKSHIELDS, G., BROWN, N. P., CHENNA, R., MCGETTIGAN, P. A., MCWILLIAM, H., VALENTIN, F., WALLACE, I. M., WILM, A., LOPEZ, R., THOMPSON, J. D., GIBSON, T. J., HIGGINS, D. G. 2007: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948; doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 (Pubitemid 350162903)
13. LEGENDRE, P. 1971: Circumscribing the concept of the genus. Taxon 20, 137-139.
14. MANN, D. G. 1997: Shifting sands: The use of lower taxonomic ranks in diatoms. Diatom 13, 13-17.
15. MEDLIN L. K., SATO S., MANN D. G., KOOISTRA W. H. C. F. 2008a: Molecular evidence confirms sister relationship of Ardissonea, Climacosphenia and Toxarium within the bipolar centric diatoms. Journal of Phycology 44, 1340-1348.
16. MEDLIN L. K., JUNG, I., BAHULIKAR, R., MENDGEN, K., KROTH, P., KOOISTRA, W. H. C. F. 2008b: Evolution of the diatoms. VI. Assessment of the new genera in the araphids using molecular data. Nova Hedwigia 133, 81-100.
17. MEREZHKOWSKY, C. 1902: On the classification of diatoms. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 9, 65-68.
18. NIXON, K. C. 1999: The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15, 407-414.
19. NIXON, K. C. 1999-2002: WinClada ver. 1.0000. Published by the author, Ithaca, NY, USA.
20. PATTERSON, C. 1982: Morphological characters and homology. In: JOYSEY, K. A., FRIDAY, A. E. (eds), Problems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction, 21-74. Academic Press, London.
21. ROUND, F. E. 1997a: Genera, species and varieties - are problems real or imagined? Diatom 13, 25-29.
22. ROUND, F. E. 1997b: Does each diatom genus have a unique feature? Diatom Research 12, 341-345.
23. ROUND, F. E., CRAWFORD, R. M., MANN, D. G. 1990: The diatoms - biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. SATO, S., MANN, D. G., MATSUMOTO, S., MEDLIN, L. K. 2008a: Pseudostriatella (Bacillariophyta) : a description of a new araphid diatom genus based on observations of frustule and auxospore structure and 18S rDNA phylogeny. Phycologia 47, 371-391.
25. SATO, S., KOOISTRA, W. H. C. F., WATANABE, T., MATSUMOTO, S., MEDLIN, L. K. 2008b: A new araphid diatom genus Psammoneis gen. nov. (Plagiogrammaceae, Bacillariophyta) with three new species based on SSU and LSU rDNA sequence data and morphology. Phycologia 47, 510-528.
26. SHERFF, E. E. 1940: The concept of the genus: IV. The delimitations of genera from the conservative point of view. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 67, 375-380.
27. SMITH, W. 1853: A Synopsis of the British Diatomaceae, 1. Smith and Beck, London.
28. STEVENS, P. F. 1983: The genus concept in practice - but for what practice? Kew Bulletin 40, 457-465.
29. VANLANDINGHAM, S. L. 1971: Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part IV. Fragilaria through Naunema. J. Cramer, Lehre.
30. WILLIAMS, D. M. 2007: Classification and diatom systematics: The past, the present and the future. In: BRODIE, J., LEWIS, J. (eds), Unravelling the algae, 57-91. CRC Press, Florida.
31. WILLIAMS, D. M, EBACH, M. C. 2007: The Foundations of systematics and biogeography. Springer, New York.
32. WILLIAMS, D. M, EBACH, M. C. 2009: What, exactly, is cladistics? Re-writing the history of systematics and biogeography. Acta Biotheoretica 57, 249-268.
33. WILLIAMS, D. M, KOCIOLEK, J. P. 2007: Pursuit of a natural classification of diatoms: History, monophyly and the rejection of paraphyletic taxa. European Journal of Phycology 42, 313-319.
34. WILLIAMS, D. M., REID, G. 2006: Amphorotia nov. gen., a new genus in the family Eunotiaceae (Bacillariophyceae), based on Eunotia clevei Grunow in Cleve et Grunow. Diatom Monographs 6, 1-153.