Component based shape retrieval using differential profiles

Proceedings of the 1st International ACM Conference on Multimedia Information Retrieval, MIR2008, Co-located with the 2008 ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM'08

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 216-222

  Ding, Lei ^a   Belkin, Mikhail ^a  

^a Ohio State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Differential profiles; Mixture models; Shape retrieval

Indexed keywords

2D SHAPE; COMPONENT BASED; GAUSSIAN FUNCTIONS; LINE DRAWINGS; MIXING COEFFICIENT; MIXTURE MODEL; OBJECT CONTOUR; SHAPE COMPONENTS; SHAPE DESCRIPTORS; SHAPE FEATURES; SHAPE RETRIEVAL;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICES; METHOD OF MOMENTS; MIXTURES;

MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS;

EID: 70450265607     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1460096.1460132     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. S. Belongie, J. Malik, and J. Puzicha. Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE PAMI, 24(4):509-522, 2002.
2. F. L. Bookstein. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE PAMI, 11(6):567-585, 1989.
3. A. Dempster, N. Laird, and D. Rubin. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39(1):1-38, 1977.
4. I. L. Dryden and K. V. Mardia. Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley, Chichester, 1998.
5. L. M. J. Florack, B. M. T. H. Romeny, J. J. Koenderink, and M. A. Viergever. General intensity transformations and differential invariants. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, 4(2):171-187, 1994.
6. L. Gorelick, M. Galun, E. Sharon, R. Basri, and A. Brandt. Shape representation and classification using the poisson equation. In CVPR, 2004.
7. D. P. Huttenlocher, G. A. Klanderman, and W. J. Rucklidge. Comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE PAMI, 15(9):850-863, 1993.
8. D. G. Kendall, D. Barden, T. K. Carne, and H. Le. Shape and Shape Theory. Wiley, 1999.
9. A. Khotanzad and Y. H. Hong. Invariant image recognition by zernike moments. IEEE PAMI, 12(5):489-497, 1990.
10. J. J. Koenderink and A. J. van Doorn. Representation of local geometry in the visual system. Biological Cybernetics, 55:367-375, 1987.
11. W. Kuhnel. Differential Geometry. American Mathematical Society, 2002.
12. L. J. Latecki, R. Lakamper, and U. Eckhardt. Shape descriptors for non-rigid shapes with a single closed contour. In CVPR, 2000.
13. Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recogntion. Proc. of IEEE, 86(11):2278-2324, 1998.
14. B. Leibe and B. Schiele. Analyzing appearance and contour based methods for object categorization. In CVPR, 2003.
15. F. Mokhtarian. Silhoutte based isolated object recognition through curvature scale space. IEEE PAMI, 17(5):539-544, 1995.
16. G. Mori, S. Belongie, and J. Malik. Shape contexts enable efficient retrieval of similar shapes. In CVPR, 2001.
17. R. Ohbuchi and J. Kobayashi. Unsupervised learning from a corpus for shape-based 3d model retrieval. In MIR, 2006.
18. R. Ohbuchi, M. Nakazawa, and T. Takei. Retrieving 3d shapes based on their appearance. In MIR, 2003.
19. C. Papadimitriou and K. Stieglitz. Combinatorial Optimization: Algorithms and Complexity. Prentice Hall, 1982.
20. Y. Rubner, C. Tomasi, and L. J. Guibas. A metric for distributions with applications to image databases. In ICCV, 1998.
21. C. Schmid and R. Mohr. Local grayvalue invariants for image retrieval. IEEE PAMI, 19(5):530-534, 1997.
22. P. Shilane and T. Funkhouser. Selecting distinctive 3d shape descriptors for similarity retrieval. In Shape Modeling International, 2006.
23. A. Szekely. A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2):247-250, 2004.
24. K. Valasoulis and A. Likas. Probabilistic shape-based image indexing and retrieval. In ICPR, 2004.
25. X. Zhu. Semi-supervised learning literature survey. Technical Report 1530, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 2007.