The natural caesarean

Birth

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 356-

  Smith, Jenny ^a   Plaat, Felicity ^a   Fisk, Nicholas M ^b  

^a QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; BIRTH; BREAST FEEDING; CESAREAN SECTION; LETTER; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; PARENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RITUAL; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

CESAREAN SECTION; DISSENT AND DISPUTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHILOSOPHY, MEDICAL; PREGNANCY;

EID: 70450248490     PISSN: 07307659     EISSN: 1523536X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00369.x     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Newman L, Hancock H. How natural can major surgery really be? A critique of "the natural caesarean" technique. Birth 2009 36 (2 168 170.
2. Smith J, Plaat F, Fisk NM. The natural caesarean: A woman-centred technique. BJOG 2008 115 (8 1037 1042.
3. National Institutes of Health. National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request March 27 29, 2006. Obstet Gynecol 2006 107 (6 1386 1397.
4. Edwardes C. The new "natural" Caesarean. Times Online April 4, London, 2009.
5. Smith J. Your Body, Your Baby, Your Birth. London, UK: Rodale, 2009.