Minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of lower pole stones with a diameter of 8 to 15millimeters;Die minimalinvasive perkutane Behandlung kleiner unterer Kelchsteine mit einem Durchmesser von 8 bis 15Millimeter

Aktuelle Urologie

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 351-354

  Schilling, D ^a   Gakis, G ^a   Walcher, U ^b   Germann, M ^a   Stenzl, A ^a   Nagele, U ^b  

^a Universi tsklinikum T bingen   (Germany)

^b Abteilung F r Urologie   (United States)

Author keywords

ESWL; Nephrostomielos; PCNL; Unterkelchstein; URS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LITHOTRIPSY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBINOMETRY; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 70450237754     PISSN: 00017868     EISSN: 14388820     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1224680     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Preminger G M., Tiselius H G., Assimos D G. et al. 2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 2007 178 2418-2434
2. Kalble T, Kohrmann K U., Alken P. [Clinically relevant facets of urolithiasis]. Urologe A 2008 47 537-537
3. Albala D M., Assimos D G., Clayman R V. et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis initial results. J Urol 2001 166 2072-2080
4. Holden T, Pedro R N., Hendlin K et al. Evidence-based instrumentation for flexible ureteroscopy: a review. J Endourol 2008 22 1423-1426
5. Michel M S., Trojan L, Rassweiler J J. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 2007 51 899-906 discussion 906
6. Jackman S V., Docimo S G., Cadeddu J A. et al. The mini-perc technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 1998 16 371-374
7. Lahme S, Bichler K H., Strohmaier W L. et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol 2001 40 619-624
8. Nagele U, Knoll T, Schilling D et al. [Lower pole calyceal stones]. UrologeA 2008 47 875-884
9. Candau C, Saussine C, Lang H et al. Natural history of residual renal stone fragments after ESWL. Eur Urol 2000 37 18-22
10. Pearle M S., Lingeman J E., Leveillee R et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1cm or less. J Urol 2008 179 69-73
11. Collins J W., Keeley Jr F X., Timoney A. Cost analysis of flexible ureterorenoscopy. BJU Int 2004 93 1023-1026
12. Lahme S, Zimmermanns V, Hochmuth A et al. [Minimally invasive PCNL (mini-perc). Alternative treatment modality or replacement of conventional PCNL?]. Urologe A 2008 47 563-568
13. Nagele U, Schilling D, Anastasiadis A G. et al. Closing the tract of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with gelatine matrix hemostatic sealant can replace nephrostomy tube placement. Urology 2006 68 489-493 discussion 493494
14. Schilling D, Winter B, Merseburger A S. et al. [Use of a gelatine-thrombin matrix for closure of the access tract without a nephrostomy tube inminimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy]. Urologe A 2008 47 601-607
15. Nagele U, Anastasiadis A G., Schilling D A. et al. Introducing a new sealantapplicator for easy, safe, and quick closure of a mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy access tract. J Endourol 2007 21 393-396