The benefits of service choreography for data-intensive computing

Proc. 7th Int. Workshop on Challenges of Large Applications in Distributed Environments, CLADE'09, Co-located with the 2009 Int. Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing Conf., HPDC'09

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1-10

  Barker, Adam ^a   Besana, Paolo ^b   Robertson, David ^b   Weissman, Jon B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Design

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL APPROACH; COORDINATION CALCULUS; DATA CENTRIC; DATA-INTENSIVE COMPUTING; DECENTRALISED; LIGHT WEIGHT; NUMBER OF SERVICES; OPTIMAL ARCHITECTURE; PEER-TO-PEER SYSTEM; PROCESS CALCULI; PROCESS LANGUAGES; WORK-FLOWS; WORKFLOW PATTERNS;

CLIENT SERVER COMPUTER SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; COORDINATION REACTIONS; DATA TRANSFER; DIE CASTING; LINGUISTICS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SCALABILITY;

MANAGEMENT;

EID: 70450233896     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1552315.1552317     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. A. Barker and J. van Hemert. Scientific Workflow: A Survey and Research Directions. In R. Wyrzykowski and et al., editors, Seventh International Conference on Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, Revised Selected Papers, volume 4967 of LNCS, pages 746-753. Springer, 2008.
2. A. Barker, J. B. Weissman, and J. van Hemert. Eliminating the Middle Man: Peer-to-Peer Dataflow. In HPDC '08: Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, pages 55-64. ACM, June 2008.
3. A. Barker, J. B. Weissman, and J. van Hemert. Orchestrating Data-Centric Workflows. In The 8th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid), pages 210-217. IEEE Computer Society, May 2008.
4. A. Barros, M. Dumas, and P. Oaks. A Critical Overview of the Web Services Choreography Description Language (WS-CDL). BPTrends Newsletter 3, March 2005.
5. A. Barros, M. Dumas, and A. ter Hofstede. Service Interaction Patterns. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business Process Management, pages 302-318. Springer Verlag, 2005.
6. W. Binder, I. Constantinescu, and B. Faltings. Decentralized Ochestration of Composite Web Services. In Proccedings of the International Conference on Web Services, ICWS'06, pages 869-876. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.
7. BPEL4Chor Editor. http://www.bpel4chor.org/editor/.
8. G. Decker, M. Kirov, J. M. Zaha, and M. Dumas. Maestro for Let's Dance: An Environment for Modeling Service Interactions. In Demonstration Session of the 4th International Conference on Business Process Management (BPM), Vienna, Austria, September 2006.
9. G. Decker, O. Kopp, F. Leymann, and M. Weske. BPEL4Chor: Extending BPEL for Modeling Choreographies. In Proceedings of the IEEE 2007 International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007), pages 296-303, July 2007.
10. G. Decker, H. Overdick, and J. M. Zaha. On the Suitability of WS-CDL for Choreography Modeling. In Proceedings of Methoden, Konzepte und Technologien f ür die Entwicklung von dienstebasierten Informationssystemen (EMISA), LNI P-95, Hamburg, Germany, pages 21-34, October 2006.
11. V. Dialinos, R. M. Badia, R. Sirvent, J. M. Perez, and J. Labarta. Implementing phylogenetic inference with grid superscalar. In The 5th IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid (CCGrid), pages 1093-1100. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
12. L. Fredlund. Implementing WS-CDL. In Proceedings of the second Spanish workshop on Web Technologies (JSWEB 2006), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, November 2006.
13. D. Hollingsworth. The Workflow Reference Model. Workflow Management Coalition, January 1995.
14. J. C. Jacob, D. Katz, and et. al. The Montage Architecture for Grid-Enabled Science Processing of Large, Distributed Datasets. In Proceedings of the Earth Science Technology Conference, June 2004.
15. Z. Kang, H. Wang, and P. C. Hung. WS-CDL+: An Extended WS-CDL Execution Engine for Web Service Collaboration. In IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2007), pages 928-935, 2007.
16. K. Karasavvas and et al. Introduction to OGSA-DAI Services. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 3458, pages 1-12, May 2005.
17. N. Kavantzas, D. Burdett, G. Ritzinger, and Y. Lafon. Web Services Choreography Description Language (WS-CDL) Version 1.0. W3C Candidate Recommendation, November 2005.
18. S. Kotoulas and R. Siebes. Deliverable 2.2: Adaptive routing in structured peer-to-peer overlays. Technical report, OpenKnowledge.
19. S. Krishnan, P. Wagstrom, and G. v. Laszewski. GSFL: A Workflow Framework for Grid Services. Technical report, Argonne National Argonne National Laboratory, 2002.
20. N. Lohmann, O. Kopp, F. Leymann, and W. Reisig. Analyzing BPEL4Chor: Verification and participant synthesis. In M. Dumas and R. Heckel, editors, Web Services and Formal Methods, Forth International Workshop, WS-FM 2007 Brisbane, Australia, September 28-29, 2007, Proceedings, volume 4937 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 46-60. Springer-Verlag, 2008.
21. D. Martin, D. Wutke, and F. Leymann. A Novel Approach to Decentralized Workflow Enactment. EDOC '08. 12th International IEEE Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, pages 127-136, September 2008.
22. T. Oinn, M. Addis, J. Ferris, D. Marvin, M. Senger, M. Greenwood, T. Carver, K. Glover, M. R. Pocock, A. Wipat, and P. Li. Taverna: a tool for the composition and enactment of bioinformatics workflows. Bioinformatics, 20:3045-3054, November 2004.
23. N. Osman, D. Robertson, and C. Walton. Run-time model checking of interaction and deontic models for multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Third European Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 248-259, Brussels, Belgium, December 2005.
24. pi4soa. http://sourceforge.net/projects/pi4soa.
25. D. Robertson, C. Walton, A. Barker, P. Besana, Y.-H. Chen-Burger, F. Hassan, D. Lambert, G. Li, J. McGinnis, N. Osman, A. Bundy, F. McNeill, F. van Harmelen, C. Sierra, and F. Giunchiglia. Interaction as a grounding for peer to peer knowledge sharing. In Advances in Web Semantics, volume 1. LNCS-IFIP, 2007.
26. S. Ross-Talbot. Orchestration and Choreography: Standards, Tools and Technologies for Distributed Workflows. In Workshop on Network Tools and Applications in Biology (NETTLAB 2005), October 2005.
27. R. Siebes, D. Dupplaw, S. Kotoulas, A. P. de Pinninck, F. van Harmelen, and D. Robertson. The openknowledge system: an interaction-centered approach to knowledge sharing. In Proceedings of the 15th Intl. Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS), 2007.
28. I. Taylor, M. Shields, I. Wang, and R. Philp. Distributed P2P Computing within Triana: A Galaxy Visualization Test Case. In 17th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2003), pages 16-27. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
29. The OASIS Committee. Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WS-BPEL) Version 2.0, April 2007.
30. The OpenKnowledge Framework. http://www.openk.org.
31. W.M.P van der Aalst and A.H.M. ter Hofstede and B. Kiepuszewski and A.P. Barros. Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(3), 2003.
32. J. M. Zaha, A. Barros, M. Dumas, and A. ter Hofstede. Let's Dance: A Language for Service Behavior Modelling. In R. Meersman and T. Z., editors, OTM Conferences (1), volume 4275 of LNCS, pages 145-162. Springer Verlag, 2006.