Some insights to determine the proper level of descriptions about proceduralized tasks

Progress in Nuclear Energy

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 214-224

  Park, Jinkyun ^a   Park, Soonyeol ^b   Cho, Sungi ^b  

^a Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute   (South Korea)

^b Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Decision table; Level of description; Level of experience; Proceduralized task

Indexed keywords

HUMAN OPERATOR; LEVEL OF DETAIL; PAIR-WISE COMPARISON;

DECISION TABLES;

EID: 70450223145     PISSN: 01491970     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2009.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Chiles J.R. Inviting Disaster: Lessons From the Edge of Technology (2002), Harper Business, New York
2. Choi K.Y., Park H.S., Cho S., Euh D.J., and Ki Y.S. Integral behavior of the ATLAS facility for 3-inch small break loss of coolant accident. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 40 (2008) 199
3. Combustion Engineering Owner's Group, 1996. Combustion Engineering Emergency Response Guidance, CEN-152, Rev. 04.
4. Department of Energy, 1996. Human Factors Engineering, GPG-FM-027.
5. Department of Defense, 1999. Human Engineering Program Process and Procedures, Mil-HDBK-46855A.
6. Duffy T.M., Curran T.E., and Sass D. Document design for technical job tasks: an evaluation. Human Factors 25 (1983) 143
7. Fichot F., Marchand O., Drai P., Chatelard P., Zabi'Ego M., and Fleurot J. Accident modeling and analysis. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 38 (2006) 733
8. Glossary, 2009. Available at: http://www.neiu.edu/∼dbehrlic/hrd408/glossary.htm (as of May 2009).
9. Inaba K., Stiuar O., and Smillie R.M. Guidelines for Developing Instructions (2004), CRC Press
10. Jae M.S., and Park C.K. On the tools of decision trees and influence diagrams for assessing severe accident management strategies. Journal of Korean Nuclear Society 28 (1994) 168
11. Jimmieson N.L., and Terry D.J. The moderating role of task characteristics in responses to a stressful work simulation. Journal of Organizational Behavior 20 (1999) 709
12. Jung, W., 2001. Structured information analysis for human reliability assessment of emergency tasks in nuclear power plants, Ph.D. thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology.
13. Kernan M.C., Bruning N.S., and Miller-Guhde L. Individual and group performance: effects of task complexity and information. Human Performance 7 (1994) 273
14. Kim J.W., and Park J.K. Task types and error types involved in the human-related unplanned reactor trip events. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 40 (2008) 615
15. Kwon Y.M., and Song J.H. Feasibility of long term feed and bleed operation for total loss of feedwater event. Journal of Korean Nuclear Society 28 (1994) 257
16. Lawton R. Not working to rule: understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Science 28 (1998) 77
17. Lee S.J., and Seong P.H. Development of an integrated decision support system to aid cognitive activities of operators. Nuclear Engineering and Technology 39 (2007) 703
18. Marsden P., and Green M. Optimizing procedures in manufacturing systems. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 17 (1996) 43-51
19. McRobbie, H., Fiset, J., 2006. Lessons learned in reviewing processes supporting procedural adherence. In: 27th Annual CNS Conference & 30th CNS/CAN Student Conference, Toronto, 11-14 June.
20. Miller L.A., and Stanney K.M. The effect of program-based interface design on human-computer performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 9 (1997) 119
21. Morgan R.D., Olson K.R., Krueger R.M., Schellenberg R.P., and Jackson T.T. Do the DSM decision tree improve diagnostic ability?. Journal of Clinical Psychology 56 (2000) 73
22. Nuclear Energy Agency, 1988. The human factor in nuclear power plant operation, NEA Issue Brief No. 2.
23. Park J., Jung W., Kim J., and Ha J. Analysis of Human Performance Observed under Simulated Emergencies of Nuclear Power Plants (2005), Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute KAERI/TR-2895/2005
24. Park J., and Jung W. The Development of a Quantitative Measure for the Complexity of Emergency Tasks Stipulated in Emergency Operating Procedures of Nuclear Power Plants (2006), Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute KAERI/TR-3279/2006
25. Park J., and Jung W. A study on the development of a task complexity measure for emergency operating procedures of nuclear power plants. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 92 (2007) 1102
26. Park J., and Jung W. A study on the revision of the TACOM measure. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 54 (2007) 2666
27. Sherry L., and Feary M. Evaluating flight crew operator manual documentation. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics vol. 1 (11-14 October 1998) San Diego, p. 897
28. Spiker, A., 1997. A process for measuring the usability of plant procedures. In: Proceedings on IEEE Sixth Annual Human Factors Meeting, p. 1, Orlando.
29. Sutton, I.S., 1992. Writing operating procedures. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Hazard Identification and Risk Analysis, Human Factors and Human Reliability in Process Safety, p. 293, Orlando, 15-17 January.
30. Wieringa D., Moore C., and Barnes V. Procedure Writing Principles and Practices. second ed. (1998), Battelle Press, Ohio
31. Wieringa, D.R., Farkas, D.K., 1991. Procedure writing across domains: nuclear power plant procedures and computer documentation. In: Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Conference on Systems Documentation, p. 49, Chicago, 10-12 October.
32. Wood R.E., and Locke E.A. Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. Research in Organizational Behavior 12 (1990) 73-109
33. Westinghouse Owner's Group, 1987. Emergency Response Guidance, HP-Volume, Rev. 1A.
34. Zach, S.E., 1980. Control room operating procedures: content and format. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 24th Annual Meeting, p. 125, Los Angeles, 13-17 October.