Beyond (the scope of) conflict: National black and latino advocacy group relations in the congressional and legal arenas

Perspectives on Politics

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 501-517

  Hero, Rodney E ^a   Preuhs, Robert R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450214409     PISSN: 15375927     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1537592709990831     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. (n.d.). Policy Agendas data set. NSF#SBR 9320322. Accessed October 2005 at www.policyagendas.org.
2. Browne, William P. 1990. Organized interests and their issue niches: A search for pluralism in a policy domain. Journal of Politics 52: 477-509.
3. Browning, Rufus P., Dale Rogers Marshall, and David H. Tabb. 1984. Protest Is Not Enough. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Carmichael, Stokely, and Charles V. Hamilton. 1967. Black Power: The Politics of Liberation in America. New York: Vintage Books.
5. Chavez, Linda. 1991. Out of the Barrio. New York: Basic Books.
6. Clarke, Susan E., Rodney E. Hero, Mara S. Sidney, Luis R. Fraga, and Bari A. Erlichson. 2006. Multiethnic Moments: The Politics of Urban Education Reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7. Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8. Gay, Claudine. 2006. Seeing difference: The effect of economic disparity on Black attitudes toward Latinos. American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 982-997
9. Gray, Virginia, and David Lowery. 1996. The Population Ecolog y of Interest Representation: Lobbying Communities in the American States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
10. Griffin, John D., and Brian Newman. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Grose, Christian. 2005. Disentangling constituency and legislator effects in legislative representation: Black legislators or Black districts? Social Science Quarterly 86 (2): 427-443
12. Hero, Rodney E. 1992. Latinos and the U.S. Political System: Two-tiered Pluralism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
13. Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert. 1995. Latinos and substantive representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, indirect or nonexistent? American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 640-652
14. Hojnacki, Marie. 1997. Interest groups' decisions to join alliances or work alone. American Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 61-87.
15. Hula, Kevin W. 1999. Lobbying Together: Interest Group Coalitions in Legislative Politics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
16. Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., Gilbert K. St. Clair, and Brian Woods. 1991. Explaining change in policy subsystems: Analysis of coalition stability and defection over time. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 851-880
17. Kim, Claire Jean. 1999. Bitter Fruit: The Politics of Black-Korean Conflict in New York. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. McClain, Paula D. 1993. The changing dynamics of urban politics: Black and Hispanic municipal employment-Is there competition? Journal of Politics 55 (May): 399-414.
19. McClain, Paula D., Niambi M. Carter, Victoria M. DeFrancesco Soto, Monique L. Lyle, Jeffrey D. Grynaviski, Shayla C. Nunnally, Thomas J. Scotto, J. Alan Kendrick, Gerald F. Lackey, and Kendra Davenport Cotton. 2006. Racial distancing in a Southern city: Latino immigrants' views of Black Americans. Journal of Politics 68 (3): 571-584
20. McClain, Paula D., and Albert K. Karnig. 1990. Black and Hispanic socioeconomic and political competition. American Political Science Review 84 (2): 535-545
21. Meier, Kenneth, Paula D. McClain, J.L. Polinard, and Robert D. Wrinkle. 2004. Divided or together? Conflict and cooperation between African Americans and Latinos. Political Research Quarterly 57 (3): 399-409.
22. Meier, Kenneth J., and Joseph Stewart, Jr. 1991. The Politics of Hispanic Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
23. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Pinderhughes, Dianne M. 1995. Black interest groups and the 1982 extension of the Voting Rights Act. In Blacks and the American Political System, ed. Huey L. Perry and Wayne Parent. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.
25. Preuhs, Robert R. 2006. The conditional effects of minority descriptive representation: Black legislators and policy influence in the American states. Journal of Politics 63 (3): 585-599
26. 2007. Descriptive representations as a mechanism to mitigate policy backlash. Political Research Quarterly. 60, 2:277-292
27. Rocha, Rene. 2007. Cooperation and conflict in multiracial school districts. In Latino Politics: Identity, Mobilization and Representation, ed. Rodolfo Espino, David L. Leal, and Kenneth J. Meier. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
28. Salisbury, Robert H., John P. Heinz, Edward O. Laumann, and Robert L. Nelson. 1987. Who works with whom? Interest group alliances and opposition. American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1211-1234
29. Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
30. Skrentny, John D. 2002. The Minority Rights Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
31. Sonenshein, Raphael J. 1993. Politics in Black and White: Race and Power in Los Angeles. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Spaeth, Harold. 2005. The original U.S. Supreme Court judicial database. Available at: http://www.as.uky.edu/ polisci/ulmerproject/sctdata.htm. Accessed October 2005.
33. Strolovitch, Dara Z. 2007. Affirmative Advocacy: Race, Class and Gender in Interest Group Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Vaca, Nicolas. 2004. The Presumed Alliance: The Unspoken Conflict between Latinos and Blacks and What It Means for America. New York: Harper Collins.
35. Welch, Susan, and John R. Hibbing. 1984. Hispanic representation in the U.S. Congress. Social Science Quarterly 65 (2): 328-335