Range of flexion after primary TKA: The effect of soft tissue release and implant design

Orthopedics

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2009, Pages

  Ahmed, Issaq ^a   Gray, Andrew C ^a   Van Der Linden, Marietta ^b   Nutton, Richard ^a  

^a ROYAL INFIRMARY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN MARGARET UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CAPSULE; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPHYTE; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT CAPSULE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPHYTE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 70450200187     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20090922-13     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM, Lubitz RM, Freund DA. Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; (356):93-110.
2. Ritter MA, Harty LD, Davis KE, Meding JB, Berend ME. Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. Clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85(7):1278-1285.
3. Anouchi YS, McShane M, Kelly F Jr, Elting J, Stiehl J. Range of motion in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (331):87-92. (Pubitemid 26357691)
4. Ritter MA, Stringer EA. Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; (143):115-119. (Pubitemid 10186967)
5. Parsley BS, Engh GA, Dwyer KA. Preoperative flexion. Does it influence postoperative flexion after posteriorcruciate- retaining total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (275):204-210.
6. Lee DC, Kim DH, Scott RD, Suthers K. Intraoperative flexion against gravity as an indication of ultimate range of motion in individual cases after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13(5):500-503. (Pubitemid 28380806)
7. Harvey IA, Barry K, Kirby SP, Johnson R, Elloy MA. Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(6):950-955. (Pubitemid 23337240)
8. Hsieh HH, Walker PS. Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58(1):87-93.
9. Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early result of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20(5):674-679. (Pubitemid 41073485)
10. Akagi M, Nakamura T, Matsusue Y, Ueo T, Nishijyo K, Ohnishi E. The Bisurface total knee replacement: a unique design for flexion. Four-to-nine-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82(11):1626-1633.
11. Allen DG, Beers C, Trammell R. Postoperative evaluation of the Nexgen Legacy posterior stabilized LPS flex implants. Paper presented at: La Societe Internationale De Chirugie Orthopedie et de Traumatologie/La Societe Internationale de Recherche Orthopedie et de Traumatologie XXII World Congress; August 28-31, 2002; San Diego, California.
12. Ranawat CS. Design may be counterproductive for optimizing flexion after TKR. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; (416):174-176. (Pubitemid 37413636)