The influence of wide range humidity on hydrogen detection with sensors based on nano-snO2 materials

AIP Conference Proceedings

Volumn 1137, Issue , 2009, Pages 29-33

  Pavelko, R G ^a   Vasiliev, A A ^a   Llobet, E ^a   Vilanova, X ^a   Correig, X ^a   Sevastyanov, V G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI   (Spain)

^b KURNAKOV INSTITUTE OF GENERAL AND INORGANIC CHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Gas sensor; Humidity effect; Hydrogen detection; Hydrogen fuel cell; SnO2

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450199130     PISSN: 0094243X     EISSN: 15517616     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3156530     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. L. Schlapbach, and A. Zuttel, Nature, 414 (6861), 353- 358 (2001).
2. N. Barsan, and U. Weimar, Journal of Physics- Condensed Matter, 15 (20), R813-R839 (2003).
3. N. Sergent, P. Gelin, L. Perier-Camby et al., Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical, 84 (2-3), 176-188 (2002).
4. D. Amalric-Popescu, and F. Bozon-Verduraz, Catalysis Today, 70 (1), 139-154 (2001).
5. E. W. Thornton, and P. G. Harrison, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 71 461 - 472 (1975).
6. S. Kittaka, S. Kanemoto, and T. Morimoto, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 74 676 - 685 (1978).
7. T. Sahm, A. Gurlo, N. Barsan et al., Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical, 118, (1-2), 78-83 (2006).
8. A. Gurlo, ChemPhysChem, 7, 2041-2052 (2006).
9. M. Caldararu, D. Sprinceana, V. T. Popa et al., Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical, 30 (1), 35-41 (1996).
10. M. Batzill, and U. Diebold, Progress in Surface Science, 79 (2-4), 47-154 (2005).
11. P. Gelin, and M. Primet, Applied Catalysis BEnvironmental, 39 (1), 1-37 (2002).
12. J. M. Heras, G. Estiu, and L. Viscido, Applied Surface Science, 108 (4), 455-464 (1997).