Further comparisons of finite difference schemes for computational modelling of biosensors

Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 419-433

  Britz, D ^a   Baronas, R ^b   Gaidamauskaite, E ^b   Ivanauskas, F ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Amperometric sensor; Computational electrochemistry; Numerical simulation; Reaction diffusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 70450177683     PISSN: 13925113     EISSN: 23358963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15388/na.2009.14.4.14467     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. L. Michaelis, M.L. Menten, Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung, Biochem. Z., 49, pp. 333-369, 1913.
2. G.E. Briggs, J. B.S. Haldane, A note on the kinetics of enzyme action, Biochem. J., 19, pp. 338-339, 1925.
3. S.J. Updike, G.P. Hicks, The enzyme electrode, Nature, 214, pp. 986-988, 1967.
4. G.G. Guilbault, Enzyme electrode probes, Pure Appl. Chem., 25, pp. 727-740, 1971.
5. W.J. Blaedel, T.R. Kissel, R.C. Boguslaski, Kinetic behavior of enzymes immobilized in artificial membranes, Anal. Chem., 44(12), pp. 2030-2037, 1972.
6. P.W. Carr, Fourier analysis of the transient response of potentiometric enzyme electrodes, Anal. Chem., 49(6), pp. 799-802, 1977.
7. H.F. Hameka, G.A. Rechnitz, Theory of the biocatalytic membrane electrode, J. Phys. Chem.,87(7), pp.1235-1241, 1983.
8. T. Schulmeister, Mathematical modelling of the dynamic behaviour of amperometric enzyme electrodes, Select. Electr. Rev., 12(2), pp. 203-260, 1990.
9. J. J. Kulys, M. V. Pesliakiene, A.S. Samalius, 401 - the development of bienzyme glucose electrodes, Bioelectroch. Bioener., 8(1), pp. 81-88, 1981.
10. L.D. Mell, J.T. Maloy, A model for the amperometric enzyme electrode obtained through digital simulation and applied to the immobilized glucose oxidase system, Anal. Chem., 47(2), pp. 299-307, 1975.
11. P. Jochum, B.R. Kowalski, A coupled two-compartment model for immobilized enzyme electrodes, Anal. Chim. Acta, 144, pp. 25-38, 1982.
12. A. Bergel, M. Comtat, Theoretical evaluation of transient responses of an amperometric enzyme electrode, Anal. Chem., 56(14), pp. 2904-2909, 1984.
13. R. Baronas, F. Ivanauskas, J. Kulys, Computational modelling of the bahaviour of potentiometric membrane biosensors, J. Math. Chem., 42(3), pp. 321-336, 2007.
14. E. Gaidamauskaite, R. Baronas, A comparison of finite difference schemes for computational models of biosensors, Nonlinear Anal. Model. Control, 12(3), pp. 359-369, 2007.
15. A.P.F. Turner, I. Karube, G.S. Wilson, Biosensors: Fundamentals and Applications, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987.
16. D. Britz, Digital Simulation in Electrochemistry, 3rd ed., Springer, Berlin, 2005.
17. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in Fortran, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986.
18. J. Crank, P. Nicolson, A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc., 43, pp. 50-67, 1947.
19. S.W. Feldberg, Digital simulation: a general method for solving electrochemical diffusion- kinetic problems, in: Electroanal. Chem., Vol. 3, A.J. Bard (Ed.), Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 199-296, 1969.
20. P. Laasonen, Ü ber eine Methode zur Lösung der Wärmeleitungsgleichung, Acta Math., 81, pp. 309-317, 1949.
21. A.R. Gourlay, Hopscotch: a fast second-order partial differential equation solver, J. Inst.Maths. Appl., 6(4), pp.375-390, 1970.
22. D. Shoup, A. Szabo, Hopscotch: An algorithm for the numerical solution of electrochemical problems, J. Electroanal. Chem., 160, pp. 1-17, 1984.
23. S.W. Feldberg, Propagational inadequacy of the hopscotch finite difference algorithm: the enhancement of performance when used with an exponentially expanding grid for simulation of electrochemical diffusion problems, J. Electroanal. Chem., 222(1-2), pp. 101-106, 1987.
24. L.H. Thomas, Elliptic Problems in Linear Difference Equations over a Network, Watson Scientific Computing Laboratory, Columbia University, New York, 1949.
25. L.H. Thomas, Elliptic problems in linear equations over a network, Special Collection Dept. of the North Carolina State Univ. Libraries, The Llewellyn Hilleth Thomas Papers 1921-1989, item 210.8-13.8, 1949.
26. D. Britz, Investigation of the relative merits of some n-point current approximations in digital simulations. Application to an improved algorithm for quasireversible systems, Anal. Chim. Acta, 193, pp. 277-285, 1987.
27. H. Rosenbrock, Some general implicit processes for the numerical solution of differential equations, Computer J., 5(4), pp. 329-330, 1962/3.
28. L.K. Bieniasz, Finite-difference electrochemical kinetic simulations using the Rosenbrock time integration scheme, J. Electroanal. Chem., 469(2), pp. 97-115, 1999.
29. D. Britz, O. Østerby, J. Strutwolf, Damping of Crank-Nicolson error oscillations, Comput. Biol.Chem., 27(3), pp. 253-263, 2003.
30. J. D. Lawson, J.L. Morris, The extrapolation of first order methods for parabolic partial differential equations I, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 15(6), pp. 1212-1224, 1978.
31. A.R. Gourlay, J. L. Morris, The extrapolation of first order methods for parabolic partial differential equations II, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 17(5), pp.641-655, 1980.
32. J. Strutwolf, W.W. Schoeller, Digital simulation of potential step experiments using the extrapolation method, Electroanal., 9(8), pp. 1403-1408, 1997.
33. O. Østerby, The error of the Crank-Nicolson method for linear parabolic equations with a derivative boundary condition, Technical Report PB-534, DAIMI, Aarhus University, 1998.