History matching with parametrization based on the SVD of a dimensionless sensitivity matrix

SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 455-476

  Tavakoli, Reza ^a   Reynolds, Albert C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; NEWTON-RAPHSON METHOD; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIRS;

AUTOMATIC HISTORY MATCHING; DIMENSIONLESS SENSITIVITIES; GAUSS-NEWTON METHODS; LEVENBERG-MARQUARDT ALGORITHM; NONLINEAR CONJUGATE GRADIENT ALGORITHMS; QUASI-NEWTON METHODS; SENSITIVITY COEFFICIENT; THEORETICAL ARGUMENTS;

SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

EID: 70450174257     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2118/118952-ms     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Abacioglu, Y., D. S. Oliver, and A. C. Reynolds, Efficient reservoir history matching using subspace vectors, Computational Geosciences, 5(2), 151-172, 2001.
2. Anterion, F., B. Karcher, and R. Eymard, Use of parameter gradients for reservoir history matching, SPE-18433, in 10th SPE Reservoir Simulation Symp., pp. 339-354, 1989.
3. Beck, J. V. and K. J. Arnold, Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, 1977.
4. Bissell, R., Calculating optimal parameters for history matching, in 4th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, 1994.
5. Chavent, G. M., M. Dupuy, and P. Lemonnier, History matching by use of optimal control theory, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 15(1), 74-86, 1975.
6. Chen, W. H., G. R. Gavalas, J. H. Seinfeld, and M. L. Wasserman, A new algorithm for automatic history matching, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., pp. 593-608, 1974.
7. Chu, L., M. Komara, and R. A. Schatzinger, An efficient technique for inversion of reservoir properties using iteration method, SPE Journal, 5(1), 71-81, 2000.
8. de Marsily, G., G. Lavedan, M. Boucher, and G. Fasanino, Interpretation of interference tests in a well field using geostatistical techniques to fit the permeability distribution in a reservoir model, in Geostatistics for Natural Resources Characterization, Part 2, pp. 831-849, D. Reidel, 1984.
9. Dietrich, C. R., Optimum selection of basis functions for ill-posed problems, in Model CARE 90: Calibration and Reliability in Groundwater Modelling, vol. 195, pp. 13-22, Tnt. Assoc. of Hydrol. Sci., 1990.
10. Gao, G., Data Integration and Uncertainty Evaluation for Large Scale Automatic History Matching Problems, Ph.D. thesis, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2005.
11. Gao, G., G. Li, and A. C. Reynolds, A stochastic algorithm for automatic history matching, SPE Journal, 12(2), 196-208, 2007.
12. Gao, G. and A. C. Reynolds, An improved implementation of the LBFGS algorithm for automatic history matching, SPE Journal, 11(1), 5-17, 2006.
13. Gao, G., M. Zafari, and A. C. Reynolds, Quantifying uncertainty for the PUNQ-S3 problem in a Bayesian setting with RML and EnKF, SPE Journal, 11(4), 506-515, 2006.
14. Gavalas, G. R., P. C. Shah, and J. H. Seinfeld, Reservoir history matching by Bayesian estimation, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 16(6), 337-350, 1976.
15. Golub, G. H. and C. F. van Loan, Matrix Computations, second edn., The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1989.
16. Grimstad, A. A., T. Mannseth, S. A. Aanonsen, I. Aavatsmark, A. Cominelli, and S. Mantica, Identification of unknown permeability trends from history matching of production data (SPE-77485), in 2002 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2002.
17. Grimstad, A. A., T. Mannseth, G. Naevdal, and G. Urkedal, Scale splitting approach to reservoir characterization (SPE 66394), in 2001 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2001.
18. Hu, L. Y., M. L. Ravalec, G. Blanc, F. Roggero, B. Noetinger, A. Hans, and B. Corre, Reducing uncertainties in production forecasts by constraining geological modeling to dynmaic data, in Proceedings of the 1999 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp. 1-8, 1999.
19. Jacquard, P. and C. Jam, Permeability distribution from field pressure data, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 5(4), 281-294, 1965.
20. Jahns, H. 0., A rapid method for obtaining a two-dimensional reservoir description from well pressure response data, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 6(12), 315-327, 1966.
21. Levenberg, K., A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics,2, 164-168, 1944.
22. Li, R., A. C. Reynolds, and D. S. Oliver, History matching of three-phase flow production data, SPE J., 8(4), 328-340, 2003.
23. Marquardt, D. W., An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters, J. Soc. Indust. Appl. Math., 11(2), 431-441, 1963.
24. Oldenburg, D. W. and Y. Li, Subspace linear inverse method, Inverse Problems, 10, 915-935, 1994.
25. Oldenburg, D. W., P. R. McGillivray, and R. G. Ellis, Generalized subspace methods for large-scale inverse problems, Geophys. J. Int., 114(1), 12-20, 1993.
26. O'Leary, D. and J. Simmons. A bidiagonalization-regularization procedure for large scale discretizations of ill-posed problems, SIAM J. SCi. Stat. Comput., 2(4), 474-489, 1981.
27. Oliver, D. S., Multiple realizations of the permeability field from well-test data, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 1(2), 145-154, 1996.
28. Oliver, D. S., A. C. Reynolds, and N. Liu, Inverse Theory for Petroleum Reservoir Characterization and History Matching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008.
29. RamaRao, B. S., A. M. LaVenue, G. de Marsily, and M. G. Marietta, Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields, 1. Theory and computational experiments, Water Resour. Res., 31(3), 475-493, 1995.
30. Reynolds, A. C., N. He, L. Chu, and D. S. Oliver, Reparameterization techniques for generating reservoir descriptions conditioned to variograms and well-test pressure data, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 1(4), 413-426, 1996.
31. Rodriques, J. R. P., Calculating derivatives for history matching in reservoir simulators (SPE-93445), in SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, p. 9, 2005.
32. Rodriques, J. R. P., Calculating derivatives for automatic history matching, Computational Geosciences, 10, 119-136, 2006.
33. Shah, P. C., G. R. Gavalas, and J. H. Seinfeld, Error analysis in history matching: The optimum level of parameterization, Soc. Petrol. Eng. J., 18(6), 219-228, 1978.
34. Tarantola, A., Inverse Problem Theory: Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987.
35. Vogel, C. R. and J. G. Wade, Iterative SVD-based methods for ill-posed problems, SIAM J. Sci. Computing, 15(3), 736-754, 1994.
36. Yeh, W. W.-G., Y. S. Yoon, and K. S. Lee, Aquifer parameter identification with kriging and optimum parameterization, Water Resour. Res., 19(1), 225-233, 1983.
37. Zafari, M. and A. C. Reynolds, Assessing the uncertainty in reservoir description and performance predictions with the ensemble Kalman filter, (SPE-95750), in Proceedings of the 2005 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 2005.
38. Zhang, F. and A. C. Reynolds, Optimization algorithms for automatic history matching of production data, Proceedings of 8th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, pp. 1-10, 2002.
39. Zhang, F., A. C. Reynolds, and D. S. Oliver, Evaluation of the reduction in uncertainty obtained by conditioning a 3D stochastic channel to multiwell pressure data, Mathematical Geology, 34(6), 713-740, 2002.