Web 2.0 proclivity: Understanding how personal use influences organizational adoption

SIGDOC'09 - Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 257-263

  Cummings, Jeff ^a   Massey, Anne P ^a   Ramesh, V ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Survey research; Technology adoption; Web 2.0; Web proclivity

Indexed keywords

DAY-TO-DAY OPERATIONS; ENGINE DESIGN; EXTERNAL BEHAVIOR; MANUFACTURING COMPANIES; ORGANIZATIONAL PRACTICES; PERSONAL USE; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS; SURVEY RESEARCH; WEB 2.0; WIKIPEDIA; YOUTUBE;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; MACHINE DESIGN; PERSONNEL; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 70450164438     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1621995.1622047     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. S. Murugesan, "Understanding Web 2.0," IT Professional, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 34-41, 2007.
2. R. F. Zammuto, T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak et al., "Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization," Organization Science, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 749-762, 2007.
3. T. O'Reilly, "What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software," Communications and Strategies, vol. 65, pp. 17-37, 2007.
4. L. Tredinnick, "Web 2.0 and Business: A pointer to the intranets of the future?," Business Information Review, vol. 23, pp. 228-234, 2006.
5. O. Mahmood, and S. Selvadurai, "Modeling "Web of Trust" with Web 2.0," PROCEEDINGS OF WORLD ACADEMY OF SCIENCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 18, pp. 122-127, 2006.
6. J. Foley, "Are You Blogging Yet?," Information Week, July 22, 2002.
7. B. Leuf, and W. Cunningham, The Wiki Way: Quick Collaboration on the WebLaflin, PA: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2001.
8. G. DeSanctis, and B. Gallup, "A foundation for the study of group decision support systems," Management Science, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1589-1609, 1987.
9. J. F. Nunamaker Jr., L. M. Applegate, and B. R. Konsynski, "Facilitating group creativity with GDSS," Journal of management information systems, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 5-19, 1987.
10. M. Alavi, and D. Leidner, "Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues," MIS Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 107-136, 2001.
11. M. Alavi, and D. Leidner, "Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits," Communications of the ACM, vol. 1, no. 7, 1999.
12. T. Davenport, Thinking for a Liviing, Boston: Harvard Business Press, 2005.
13. A. Tapiador, A. Fumero, J. Salvachua et al., "A Web Collaboration Architecture," in 2006 International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, 2006.
14. A. McAfee, "Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration," IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 38-47, 2006. (Pubitemid 46437009)
15. B. Decker, E. Ras, J. Rech et al., "Wiki-Based Stakeholder Participation in Requirements Engineering," IEEE Software, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 28-35, 2007.
16. A. Majchrzak, C. Wagner, and D. Yates, "Corporate Wiki Users: Results of a Survey," in WikiSym, Odenese, Denmark, 2006, pp. 99-104.
17. I. Ajzen, and M. Fishbein, Undertanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
18. I. Azjen, "From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior.," Action control: From cognition to behavior, Berlin and New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
19. E. M. Rogers, The Diffusion of Innovation, Third Edition ed., New York: Free Press, 1983.
20. F. D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989.
21. F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982-1003, 1989.
22. G. C. Moore, and I. Benbasat, "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Researchvol. 2, no. 3, pp. 192-222, 1991.
23. V. Venkatesh, and F. D. Davis, "Modeling the Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use," in Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, British Columbia, 1994, pp. 213-227.
24. V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis et al., "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478, 2003.
25. M. L. Markus, "Toward a "Critical Mass" Theory of Interactive Media," Communication Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 491-511, 1987.
26. R. Agarwal, and J. Prasad, "A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology," Information Systems Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 204-215, 1998.
27. R. Agarwal, and J. Prasad, "Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies?," Decision Sciences, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 361-391, 1999.
28. D. M. Smith, Key Issues for Web 2.0 and Consumerization, Gartner Group, Stamford, CT, 2007.
29. W. Lewis, R. Agarwal, and V. Sambamurthy, "Sources of Influence on Beliefs about Information Technology Use: An Empirical Study of Knowledge Workers," MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 657-678, 2003.
30. W. Wood, R. Behling, and S. Haugen, "Blogs and Business: Opportunities and Headaches," Issues in Information Systems, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 312-316, 2006.
31. J. Anderson, and D. Gerbing, "Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A reveiw and recommended two-step approach," Psychological Bulletin, vol. 103, pp. 411-423, 1988.
32. R. Bagozzi, and H. Baumgartner, "The Evaluation of Structural Equation Models and Hypothesis Testing," Principles of Marketing Research, R. Bagozzi, ed., pp. 386-422, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
33. R. Bagozzi, and Y. Yi, "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models," Journal of Marketing Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 74-94, 1988.
34. L. Hu, and P. M. Bentler, "Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives," Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1-55, 1999.
35. K. G. Jöreskog, and D. Sörbom, LISREL 8: Analysis of linear structural relationsChicago, IL: Scientific Software, 1992.
36. A. Parasuraman, and C. L. Colby, Techno-Ready Marketing, New York: Free Press, 2001.
37. R. Hof, "Web 2.0 Has Corporate America Spinning," Business Week, 2006.