Fuzzy-Cuts: A knowledge-driven graph-based method for medical image segmentation

2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 715-722

  Chittajallu, D R ^a   Brunner, G ^a   Kurkure, U ^a   Yalamanchili, R P ^a   Kakadiaris, I A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER VISION; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; GIBBS FREE ENERGY; GRAPHIC METHODS; MAGNETORHEOLOGICAL FLUIDS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MEDICAL IMAGE PROCESSING;

FUZZY CONNECTIVITY; GIBBS ENERGY FUNCTIONS; GRAPH-BASED METHODS; HEART SEGMENTATION; ILL POSED PROBLEM; MARKOV RANDOM FIELDS; MAXIMUM A POSTERIORI ESTIMATION; PRIOR INFORMATION;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 70450162141     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206623     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. I. Bloch. Fuzzy spatial relationships for image processing and interpretation: a review. Image and Vision Computing, 23(2):89-110, 2005.
2. Y. Boykov and G. Funka-Lea. Graph cuts and efficient ND image segmentation. International Journal of Computer Vision, 70(2):109-131, 2006.
3. Y. Boykov, O. Veksler, and R. Zabih. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 23(11):1222-1239, 2001.
4. th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 1, pages 105-112, 2001.
5. O. Camara, O. Colliot, and I. Bloch. Computational modeling of thoracic and abdominal anatomy using spatial relationships for image segmentation. Real-Time Imaging, 10(4):263-273, 2004.
6. T. Chen and D. Metaxas. A hybrid framework for 3D medical image segmentation. Medical Image Analysis, 9(6):547-565, 2005.
7. D. M. Greig, B. T. Porteous, and A. H. Seheult. Exact maximum a posteriori estimation for binary images. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 51(2):271-279, 1989.
8. J. M. Hammersley and P. Clifford. Markov field on finite graphs and lattices, 1971.
9. th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, volume 2, pages 922-929, 2005.
10. V. Kolmogorov and R. Zabin. What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts? IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26(2):147-159, 2004.
11. U. Kurkure. Computational methods for non-invasive cardiovascular image analysis. PhD thesis, University of Houston, Houston, TX, May 2008.
12. S. Z. Li. Markov random field modeling in computer vision. Springer-Verlag, 1995.
13. R. P. Nikhil and K. P. Sankar. A review on image segmentation techniques. Pattern Recognition, 26(9):1277-1294, 1993.
14. H. Park, P. Bland, and C. Meyer. Construction of an abdominal probabilistic atlas and its application in segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, 22(4):483-492, 2003.
15. A. S. Pednekar and I. A. Kakadiaris. Image segmentation based on fuzzy connectedness using dynamic weights. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, 15(6):1555-1562, 2006.
16. D. L. Pham, C. Xu, and J. L. Prince. Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 2:315-337, 2000.
17. M. Sonka, V. Hlavac, and R. Boyle. Image processing, analysis, and machine vision: third edition. Thomson, 2008.
18. J. K. Udupa, P. K. Saha, and R. A. Lotufo. Relative fuzzy connectedness and object definition: theory, algorithms, and applications in image segmentation. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(11):, 2002.
19. J. K. Udupa and S. Samarasekera. Fuzzy connectedness and object definition: Theory, algorithms, and applications in image segmentation. Graphical Models and Image Processing, 58(3):246-261, 1996.