Usability framework for the design and evaluation of multimodal interaction

Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Culture, Creativity, Interaction, BCS HCI 2008

Volumn 2, Issue , 2008, Pages 123-126

  Chang, Jaeseung ^a   Bourguet, Marie Luce ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Finite state machine; Interaction design; Modelling; Multimodality; Usability evaluation

Indexed keywords

FINITE AUTOMATA; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE DEVICES; LOGIC CIRCUITS; MODELS; SIGNAL ENCODING; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

DESIGN AND EVALUATIONS; GENERAL METHODOLOGIES; INTERACTION DESIGN; MULTI-MODAL INTERACTIONS; MULTI-MODALITY; MULTIMODAL SYSTEM; USABILITY EVALUATION; USABILITY TECHNIQUES;

DESIGN;

EID: 70450161606     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Bourguet, M. L. How finite state machines can be used to build error free multimodal interaction systems. The 17th British HCI Group Annual Conference, 2 (2003) 81-84.
2. Bourguet, M. L. Designing and prototyping multimodal commands. Human-Computer Interaction INTERACT' 03 (2003) 717-720.
3. Bourguet, M. L. Software design and development of multimodal interaction. IFIP 18th World Computer Congress Topical Days (2004) 409-414.
4. Bourguet, M. L. and Chang, J. Design and usability evaluation of multimodal interaction with finite state machines: a conceptual framework. To appear in Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces 2008 (2008)
5. Cohen, P. R., Johnston, M., McGee, D., Oviatt, S., Pittman, J., and Smith, I. et al. QuickSet: multimodal interaction for simulation set-up and control. Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing (1997) 20-24.
6. Coutaz, J., Nigay, L., Salber, D., Blandford, A., May, J, and Young, R. M. Four easy pieces for assessing the usability of multimodal interaction: the CARE properties. Proceedings of INTERACT' 95 (1995) 115-120.
7. Hudson, S. E. and Newell, G. L. Probabilistic state machines: dialog management for inputs with uncertainty. Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (1992) 199-208.
8. Minsky, M. Minsky's frame system theory, Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. Proceedings of the 1975 Workshop on Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, 3 (1975) 104-116.
9. Nigay, L. and Coutaz, J. A design space for multimodal systems: concurrent processing and data fusion. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (1993) 172-178.
10. Oviatt, S. Mutual disambiguation of recognition errors in a multimodal architecture. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: the CHI is the Limit (1999) 576-583.
11. Oviatt, S., Cohen, P. R., Wu, L., Vergo, J., Duncan, L., and Suhm, B. et al. Designing the user interface for multimodal speech and pen-based gesture applications: state-of-the-art systems and future research directions. Human-Computer Interaction, 15 (2000) 263-322.
12. Parnas, D. L. On the use of transition diagrams in the design of a user interface for an interactive computer system. ACM/CSC-ER, Proceedings of the 1969 24th National Conference, ACM Press (1969) 379-385.
13. Shimazu, H., Arita, S., and Takashima, Y. Multi-modal definite clause grammar. Proceedings of 15th Conference on Computational Linguistics, 2 (1994) 832-836.
14. Van Gurp, J. and Bosch, J. On the implementation of finite state machines. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual IASTED International Conference on Software Engineering and Applications (1999), 172-178.
15. Wasserman, A. Extending state transition diagrams for the specification of human-computer interaction. IEEE Transactions on SW Engineering, 11 (1985), 699-713.