A meta-regression analysis of forest carbon offset costs

Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2009, Pages 2153-2167

  van Kooten, G Cornelis ^a   Laaksonen Craig, Susanna ^b   Wang, Yichuan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOREAL REGIONS; CARBON CREDITS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CARBON UPTAKE; EMISSIONS REDUCTION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FOREST PLANTATION; FOSSIL FUEL EMISSIONS; KYOTO PROTOCOL; REGRESSION ESTIMATES; TROPICAL REGIONS;

BIOMASS; CLIMATE CHANGE; COSTS; EMISSION CONTROL; FORESTRY; FOSSIL FUELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIMBER;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

BIOMASS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CARBON SINK; CLIMATE CHANGE; EMISSION CONTROL; EMISSIONS TRADING; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY PRACTICE; FOSSIL FUEL; KYOTO PROTOCOL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TROPICAL REGION;

CARBON; CHELATION; EMISSION; FORESTS; FOSSIL FUELS; SEASONAL VARIATION;

EID: 70450091003     PISSN: 00455067     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/X09-139     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Adams, R.M., Adams, D.M., Callaway, J.M., Chang, C.-C., and McCarl, B.A. 1993. Sequestering carbon on agricultural land: social cost and impacts on timber markets. Contemp. Policy Issues, 11(1): 76-87.
2. Adams, D.M., Alig, R.J., McCarl, B.A., Callaway, J.M., and Winnett, S.M. 1999. Minimum cost strategies for sequestering carbon in forests. Land Econ. 75(3): 360-374. doi:10.2307/3147183.
3. Andrasko, K., Heaton, K., and Winnett, S. 1991. Estimating the costs and efficiency of options to manage global forests: a cost curve approach. In Proceedings of Technical Workshop to Explore Options for Global Forestry Management. Edited by D. Howlett and C. Sargent. International Institute for Environment & Development, London. pp. 216-33.
4. Baral, A., and Guha, G.S. 2004. Trees for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution: the issue of cost vs. carbon benefit. Biomass Bioenergy, 27(1): 41-55. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11. 004.
5. Bateman, I. 2009. Guidelines for designing and implementing transferable non-market valuation studies. Keynote address at Preconference on Water Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 24 June 2009, Amsterdam. Available from www.webmeets.com/files/papers/EAERE/2009/945/090201%20-%20Aquamoney%20CDV%20-%20EAERE%20for mat%20-%20guidelines%20version%20-%20anon.pdf.
6. Benitez, P.C., and Obersteiner, M. 2003. The economics of including carbon sinks in climate change policy-evaluating the carbon supply curve through afforestation in Latin America. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria. IIASA Interim Rep. IR-03-019.
7. Benitez, P.C., McCallum, I., Obersteiner, M., and Yamagata, Y. 2007. Global potential for carbon sequestration: geographical distribution, country risk and policy implications. Ecol. Econ. 60(3): 572-583. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.015.
8. Boscolo, M., and Buongiorno, J. 1997. Managing a tropical rainforest for timber, carbon storage, and tree diversity. Commonw. For. Rev. 76(4): 246-254.
9. Boscolo, M., Buongiorno, J., and Panayotou, T. 1997. Simulating options for carbon sequestration through improved management of a lowland tropical rainforest. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2(3): 241-263. doi:10.1017/S1355770X97000028.
10. Brown, P., Cabarle, B., and Livernash, R. 1997. Carbon counts: estimating climate change mitigation in forestry projects. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. Published by NRC Research Press.
11. Cacho, O.J., Hean, R.L., and Wise, R. 2003. Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 47(2): 153-179. doi:10.1111/1467-8489.00208.
12. Callaway, J.M., and McCarl, B.A. 1996. The economic consequences of substituting carbon payments for crop subsidies in U.S. agriculture. Environ. Resour. Econ. 7(1): 15-43. doi:10. 1007/BF00420425.
13. Caspersen, J.P., Pacala, S.W., Jenkins, J.C., Hurtt, G.C., Moorcroft, P.R., and Birdsey, R.A. 2000. Contributions of land-use history to carbon accumulation in U.S. forests. Science (Washington, D.C.), 290(5494);1148-1151doi:10.1126/science.290.5494. 1148. PMID:11073451.
14. Darmstadter, J., and Plantinga, A.J. 1991. The economic cost of CO2 mitigation: a review of estimates for selected world regions. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. RFF Discuss. Pap. ENR 91-06.
15. Dixon, R.K., Andrasko, K.J., Sussman, F.G., Lavinson, M.A., Trexler, M.C., and Vinson, T.S. 1993. Forest sector carbon offset projects: near-term opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 70(1-4): 561-577. doi:10. 1007/BF01105022.
16. Dixon, R.K., Winjum, J.K., Andrasko, K.J., Lee, J.J., and Schroeder, P.E. 1994. Integrated land-use systems: assessment of promising agroforest and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration. Clim. Change, 27(1): 71-92. doi:10.1007/BF01098474.
17. Dudek, D.J., and LeBlanc, A. 1990. Offsetting new CO2 emissions: a rational first greenhouse policy step. Contemp. Policy Issues, 8(3): 29-42.
18. Dutschke, M. 2000. Host country-driven implementation: the case of Costa Rica. In Climate policy and development: flexible instruments and developing countries. Edited by A. Michaelowa and M. Dutschke. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, U.K. pp. 133-179.
19. Fearnside, P.M. 1995. Global warming response options in Brazil's forest sector: comparison of project-level costs and benefits. Biomass Bioenergy, 8(5): 309-322. doi:10.1016/0961-9534(95) 00024-0.
20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2004. A review of carbon sequestration projects. Land and Plant Nutrition Service, Land and Water Development Division, FAO, Rome. AGL Misc. Pap. AGL/MISC/37/2004.
21. Greene, W.H. 2000. Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N.J.
22. Healey, J.R., Price, C., and Tay, J. 2000. The cost of carbon retention by reduced impact logging. For. Ecol. Manage. 139(1-3): 237-255. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00385-6.
23. Hoen, H.F., and Solberg, B. 1994. Potential and economic efficiency of carbon sequestration in forest biomass through silvicultural management. For. Sci. 40(3): 429-451.
24. Houghton, R.A., Unruh, J., and Lefebvre, P.A. 1991. Current land use in the tropics and its potential for sequestering carbon. In Proceedings of Technical Workshop to Explore Options for Global Forestry Management. Edited by D. Howlett and C. Sargent. International Institute for Environment & Development, London. pp. 297-310.
25. Huang, C.-H., and Kronrad, G.D. 2001. The cost of sequestering carbon on private forest lands. For. Policy Econ. 2: 133-142.
26. Koetse, M.J., Florax, R.J.G.M., and de Groot, H.L.F. 2005. Correcting for primary study misspecifications in meta-analysis. Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam. Discuss. Pap. TI 2005-029/3.
27. Krcmar, E., and van Kooten, G.C. 2005. Boreal forest carbon sequestration strategies: a case study of the Little Red River Cree First Nation land tenures. Can. J. Agric. Econ. 53(4): 325-341. doi:10.1111/j.1744-7976.2005.00022.x. 2165
28. Lasco, R.D., Lales, J.S., Arnuevo, M.T., Guillermo, I.Q., de Jesus, A.C., Medrano, R., Bajar, O.F., and Mendoza, C.V. 2002. Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage and sequestration of land cover in the Leyte Geothermal Reservation. Renew. Energy, 25(2): 307-315. doi:10.1016/S0960-1481(01)00065-9.
29. Lashof, D., and Tirpak, D. 1989. Policy options for stabilizing global climate. Chapter VII. Part Four. Forestry. Report to Congress. Vol. 2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
30. Makundi, W.R., and Okiting'ati, A. 1995. Carbon flows and economic evaluation of mitigation options in Tanzania's forest sector. Biomass Bioenergy, 8(5): 381-393. doi:10.1016/09619534(95)00045-3.
31. Mann, C. 1990. Meta-analysis in the breech. Science (Washington, D.C.), 249(4968): 476-480. doi:10.1126/science.2382129. PMID:2382129.
32. Mann, C.C. 1994. Can meta-analysis make policy? Science (Washington, D.C.), 266(5187): 960-962. doi:10.1126/science. 7973676. PMID:7973676.
33. Marland, G., and Schlamadinger, B. 1997. Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis. Biomass Bioenergy, 13(6): 389-397. doi:10.1016/S09619534(97)00027-5.
34. Masera, O.R., Bellon, M.R., and Segura, G. 1995. Forest management options for sequestering carbon in Mexico. Biomass Bioenergy, 8(5): 357-367. doi:10.1016/0961-9534(95)00028-3.
35. McCarl, B.A., and Callaway, J.M. 1995. Carbon sequestration through tree planting on agricultural lands. In Soil management and greenhouse effect. Edited by R. Lal, J. Kimble, E. Levine, and B.A. Stewart. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla. pp. 329-338.
36. Moulton, R.J., and Richards, K.R. 1990. Costs of sequestering carbon through tree planting and forest management in the United States. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-58.
37. Moura-Costa, P., Salmi, J., Simula, M., and Wilson, C. 1999. Financial mechanisms for sustainable forestry. United Nations Development Programme/SEED Program on Forests, Helsinki.
38. Nelson, J.P., and Kennedy, P.E. 2008. The use (and abuse) of meta-analysis in environmental and natural resource economics: an assessment. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa. Available from http://www.econ.psu.edu/papers/The%20Use%20of%20Meta-Analysis_re081208.pdf [accessed 13 August 2009].
39. New York State (NYS). 1991. Analysis of carbon reduction in New York State. Report of the NYS Energy Office in consultation with NYS Department of Environmental Conservation and NYS Department of Public Service. NYS Energy Office, New York.
40. Newell, R.G., and Stavins, R.N. 2000. Climate change and forest sinks: factors affecting the costs of carbon sequestration. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 40(3): 211-235. doi:10.1006/jeem.1999. 1120.
41. Nordhaus, W.D. 1991. The cost of slowing climate change: a survey. Energy J. (Cambridge, Mass.), 12(1): 37-65.
42. Olschewski, R., and Benitez, P.C. 2005. Secondary forests as temporary carbon sinks? The economic impact of accounting methods on reforestation projects in the tropics. Ecol. Econ. 55(3): 380-394. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.09.021.
43. Olson, K.R., Lang, J.M., and Ebelhar, S.A. 2005. Soil organic carbon changes after 12 years of no-tillage and tillage of Grantsburg soils in southern Illinois. Soil Tillage Res. 81(2): 217-225. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.09.009.
44. Parks, P.J., and Hardie, I.W. 1995. Least-cost forest carbon reserves: cost-effective subsidies to convert marginal agricultural Published by NRC Research Press 2166 land to forests. Land Econ. 71(1): 122-136. doi:10.2307/ 146763.
45. Plantinga, A.J., and Mauldin, T. 2001. A method for estimating the cost of CO2 mitigation through afforestation. Clim. Change, 9(1-2): 21-40. doi:10.1023/A:1010749214244.
46. Plantinga, A.J., Mauldin, T., and Miller, D.J. 1999. An econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81(4): 812-824. doi:10.2307/1244326.
47. Poffenberger, M., Ravindranath, N.H., Pandey, D.N., Murthy, I.K., Bist, R., and Jain, D. 2001. Communities and climate change: the clean development mechanism and village-based forest restoration in central India: a case study from Harda Forest Division. Community Forestry International, Inc., Santa Barbara, Calif.
48. Poffenberger, M., D'Silva, E., Ravindranath, N.H., Pingle, U., Murthy, I.K., and Tuttle, A. 2002. The clean development mechanism and village-based forest restoration: a case study from Adilabad District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Community Forestry International, Inc., Santa Barbara, Calif.
49. Putz, F.E., and Pinard, M.A. 1993. Reduced impact logging as a carbon offset method. Conserv. Biol. 7(4): 755-757. doi:10. 046/j.1523-1739.1993.7407551.x.
50. Ravindranath, N.H., and Somashekhar, B.S. 1995. Potential and economics of forestry options for carbon sequestration in India. Biomass Bioenergy, 8(5): 323-336. doi:10.1016/0961-9534(95) 00025-9.
51. Richards, K.R. 1997. Estimating costs of carbon sequestration for a United States greenhouse gas policy. Report prepared for Charles River Associates, Boston, Mass. School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind.
52. Richards, K.R., Moulton, R.J., and Birdsey, R.A. 1993. Costs of creating carbon sinks in the U.S. Energy Convers. Manage. 34(9-11): 905-912. doi:10.1016/0196-8904(93)90035-9.
53. Schroeder, P.E., Dixon, R.K., and Winjum, J.K. 1993. Forest management and agroforestry to sequester and conserve atmospheric carbon dioxide. Unasylva, 44(2): 52-60.
54. Sedjo, R.A., and Solomon, A.M. 1989. Climate and forests. In Greenhouse Warming: Abatement and Adaptation. Proceedings of a Workshop, 14-15 June 1988, Washington, D.C. Edited by N.J. Rosenberg, W.E. Easterling, III, P.R. Crosson, and J. Darmstadter. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. pp. 105-119.
55. Sohngen, B., and Brown, S. 2006. The cost and quantity of carbon sequestration by extending the forest rotation age. Draft. AED Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
56. Sohngen, B.L., and Haynes, R.W. 1997. The potential for increasing carbon storage in United States unreserved timberlands by reducing forest fire frequency: an economic and ecological analysis. Clim. Change, 35(2): 179-197. doi:10.1023/:1005311308790.
57. Sohngen, B., and Mendelsohn, R. 2003. An optimal control model of forest carbon sequestration. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85(2): 448-457. doi:10.1111/1467-8276.00133.
58. Solberg, B., and Hoen, H.F. 1996. Economic aspects of carbon sequestration ome findings from Norway. In Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle. Edited by M.J. Apps and D.T. Price. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 363-374.
59. Spinney, M.P., Prisley, S.P., and Sampson, R.N. 2004. Evaluation of loblolly pine plantation management regimes for wood production and carbon sequestration. Can. J. For. Res. In press.
60. Stanley, T.D. 2001. Wheat from chaff: meta-analysis as quantitative literature review. J. Econ. Perspect. 15(3): 131-150.
61. Stavins, R.N. 1999. The costs of carbon sequestration: a revealed-preference approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 89(4): 994-1009
62. Stavins, R.N., and Richards, K.R. 2005. The cost of U.S. forestbased carbon sequestration. PEW Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, Va.
63. Stennes, B. 2000. Economics of sustainable land use under climate change: an Application to the Boreal forest ecosystem of western Canada. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Forest Resources Management, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
64. Stennes, B. and McBeath, A. 2006. Bioenergy options for wood feedstock: Are trees killed by mountain pine beetle in British Columbia a viable bioenergy resource? Information Report BC- X-405. Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Victoria, B.C.
65. Stock, J.H., and Watson, M.W. 2006. Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed effects panel data regression. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass. Tech. Work. Pap. Ser. WP 323. Available from www.nber.org/papers/t0323.
66. Stockfisch, N., Forstreuter, T., and Ehlers, W. 1999. Ploughing effects on soil organic matter after twenty years of conservation tillage in Lower Saxony, Germany. Soil Tillage Res. 52(1-2): 91-101. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00063-X.
67. Stoker, T.M. 1984. Completeness, distribution restrictions, and the form of aggregate functions. Econometrica, 52(4): 887-908. doi:10.2307/1911190.
68. Stoker, T.M. 1993. Empirical approaches to the problem of aggregation over individuals. J. Econ. Lit. 31: 1827-1874.
69. Stuart, M.D., and Moura-Costa, P. 1998. Climate change mitigation by forestry: a review of international initiatives. International Institute for Environment and Development, London. Policy Works For. People Ser. 8.
70. Swisher, J.N. 1991. Cost and performance of CO2 storage in forestry projects. Biomass Bioenergy, 1(6): 317-328. doi:10.1016/ 0961-9534(91)90012-2.
71. Tata Energy Research Institute (TERI). 1997. Technical paper on assessment of forestry options for sequestration of atmospheric carbon and their costs at project level: case study of the state of Haryana, India. Tata Energy Research Institute, New Delhi, India. TERI Rep. 95/GW/52.
72. Totten, M. 1999. Getting it right: emerging markets for storing carbon in forests. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.
73. Travisi, C., Nijkamp, P., and Florax, R.J.G.M. 2004. A meta-analysis of the WTP for reductions in pesticide risk exposure. Department of Spatial Economics, Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
74. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2006. Project 0547: facilitating reforestation for uangxi Watershed Management in Pearl River Basin. CDM Executive Board, 21 July 2006. Available from http://cdm.unfccc.int/Projects/DB/TUEV-SUED1154534875.41/view.html [accessed 18 January 2007].
75. van Kooten, G.C. 2009a. Biological carbon sequestration and carbon trading re-visited. Clim. Change, 95(3-4): 449-463. doi:10. 1007/s10584-009-9572-8.
76. van Kooten, G.C. 2009b. Biological carbon sinks: transaction costs and governance. For. Chron. 85(3): 372-376.
77. van Kooten, G.C., and Bulte, E.H. 2000. The economics of nature: managing biological assets. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, U.K.
78. van Kooten, G.C., and Hauer, G. 2001. Global climate change: Canadian policy and the role of terrestrial ecosystems. Can. Public Policy, 27(3): 267-278. doi:10.2307/3552469.
79. van Kooten, G.C., Arthur, L.M., and Wilson, W.R. 1992. Potential to sequester carbon in Canadian forests: some economic considerations. Can. Public Policy, 18(2): 127-138. doi:10.2307/3551419.
80. van Kooten, G.C., Krcmar-Nozic, E., Stennes, B., and van Gorkom, R. 1999. Economics of fossil fuel substitution and wood product sinks when trees are planted to sequester carbon on agricultural lands in western Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 29(11): 1669-1678. doi:10.1139/cjfr-29-11-1669.
81. van Kooten, G.C., Stennes, B., Krcmar-Nozic, E., and van Gorkom, R. 2000. Economics of afforestation for carbon sequestration in western Canada. For. Chron. 76(1): 165-172.
82. van Kooten, G.C., Eagle, A.J., Manley, J., and Smolak, T. 2004. How costly are carbon offsets? A meta-analysis of carbon forest sinks. Environ. Sci. Policy, 7(4): 239-251. doi:10.1016/j.envsci. 2004.05.006.
83. van Vliet, O.P.R., Faaij, A.P.C., and Dieperink, C. 2003. Forestry projects under the clean development mechanism? Modelling of the uncertainties in carbon mitigation and related costs of plantation forestry. Clim. Change, 61(1-2): 123-156. doi:10.1023/A:1026370624352.
84. Volz, H., Kriebitzsch, W.U., and Schneider, T.W. 1991. Assessment of potential, feasibility and costs of forestry options in the 2167 temperate and boreal zones. In Proceedings of Technical Workshop to Explore Options for Global Forestry Management. Edited by D. Howlett and C. Sargent. International Institute for Environment & Development, London. pp. 124-158.
85. Weischselbaumer, D., and Winter-Ebmer, R. 2005. A meta-analysis of the international gender wage gap. J. Econ. Surv. 19(3): 479-511.
86. Winjum, J.K., Dixon, R.K., and Schroeder, P.E. 1993. Forest management and carbon storage: an analysis of 12 key forest nations. Water Air Soil Pollut. 70(1-4): 239-257. doi:10.1007/BF01105000.
87. Xu, D. 1995. The potential for reducing atmospheric carbon by large-scale afforestation in China and related cost/benefit analysis. Biomass Bioenergy, 8(5): 337-344. doi:10.1016/09619534(95)00026-7.
88. Zelek, C.A., and Shively, G.E. 2003. Measuring the opportunity cost of carbon sequestration in tropical agriculture. Land Econ. 79(3): 342-354. doi:10.2307/3147021